Analyzing long-term performance of the Keck-II adaptive optics system

Abstract. We present an analysis of the long-term performance of the W. M. Keck observatory laser guide star adaptive optics (LGS-AO) system and explore factors that influence the overall AO performance most strongly. Astronomical surveys can take years or decades to finish, so it is worthwhile to characterize the AO performance on such timescales in order to better understand future results. The Keck telescopes have two of the longest-running LGS-AO systems in use today, and as such they represent an excellent test-bed for processing large amounts of AO data. We use a Keck-II near infrared camera 2 (NIRC2) LGSAO surve of the Galactic Center (GC) from 2005 to 2019 for our analysis, combining image metrics with AO telemetry files, multiaperture scintillation sense/differential imaging motion monitor turbulence profiles, seeing information, weather data, and temperature readings in a compiled dataset to highlight areas of potential performance improvement. We find that image quality trends downward over time, despite multiple improvements made to Keck-II and its AO system, resulting in a 9 mas increase in the average full width at half maximum (FWHM) and a 3% decrease in the average Strehl ratio over the course of the survey. Image quality also trends upward with ambient temperature, possibly indicating the presence of uncorrected turbulence in the beam path. Using nine basic features from our dataset, we train a simple machine learning (ML) algorithm to predict the delivered image quality of NIRC2 given current atmospheric conditions, which could eventually be used for real-time observation planning and exposure time adjustments. A random forest algorithm trained on this data can predict the Strehl ratio of an image to within 18% and the FWHM to within 7%, which is a solid baseline for future applications involving more advanced ML techniques. The assembled dataset and coding tools are released to the public as a resource for testing new predictive control and point spread function-reconstruction algorithms.

[1]  Jessica R. Lu,et al.  Analyzing long-term performance of the Keck-II adaptive optics system , 2020, Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[2]  Francois Rigaut,et al.  Implementation and initial test results of the new Keck real time controller , 2020, Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[3]  Jaime Fern'andez del R'io,et al.  Array programming with NumPy , 2020, Nature.

[4]  Vanessa P. Bailey,et al.  Effects of mirror seeing on high-contrast adaptive optics instruments , 2020, Journal of Astronomical Telescopes, Instruments, and Systems.

[5]  Jessica R. Lu,et al.  Relativistic redshift of the star S0-2 orbiting the Galactic Center supermassive black hole , 2019, Science.

[6]  Dmitry Savransky,et al.  The Gemini Planet Imager Exoplanet Survey: Giant Planet and Brown Dwarf Demographics from 10 to 100 au , 2019, The Astronomical Journal.

[7]  Niek Doelman,et al.  Impact of time-variant turbulence behavior on prediction for adaptive optics systems. , 2019, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[8]  Optimizing the accuracy and efficiency of optical turbulence profiling using adaptive optics telemetry for extremely large telescopes , 2018, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

[9]  Vanessa P. Bailey,et al.  Air, telescope, and instrument temperature effects on the Gemini Planet Imager’s image quality , 2018, Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[10]  Dmitry Savransky,et al.  Mining the GPIES database , 2018, Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[11]  T. Fusco,et al.  Low wind effect on VLT/SPHERE: impact, mitigation strategy, and results , 2018, Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[12]  E. Ofek,et al.  A SEARCH FOR STELLAR-MASS BLACK HOLES VIA ASTROMETRIC MICROLENSING , 2016, 1607.08284.

[13]  Sam Ragland,et al.  Keck II laser guide star AO system and performance with the TOPTICA/MPBC laser , 2016, Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[14]  Dmitry Savransky,et al.  Status and performance of the Gemini Planet Imager adaptive optics system , 2016, Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[15]  Jessica R. Lu,et al.  AN IMPROVED DISTANCE AND MASS ESTIMATE FOR SGR A* FROM A MULTISTAR ORBIT ANALYSIS , 2016, 1607.05726.

[16]  Jessica R. Lu,et al.  A New Distortion Solution for NIRC2 on the Keck II Telescope , 2016 .

[17]  Dimitri Mawet,et al.  New developments in instrumentation at the W. M. Keck Observatory , 2016, Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[18]  Peter L. Wizinowich,et al.  Recent Improvements to the Keck II Laser Guide Star Facility , 2015 .

[19]  Peter L. Wizinowich,et al.  Laser guide star facility developments at W. M. Keck Observatory , 2014, Astronomical Telescopes and Instrumentation.

[20]  Jessica R. Lu,et al.  PROPERTIES OF THE REMNANT CLOCKWISE DISK OF YOUNG STARS IN THE GALACTIC CENTER , 2014, 1401.7354.

[21]  Roberto Biasi,et al.  The Giant Magellan Telescope adaptive optics program , 2014, Astronomical Telescopes and Instrumentation.

[22]  J. R. Lu,et al.  Adaptive optics observations of the galactic center young stars , 2012, Other Conferences.

[23]  Gaël Varoquaux,et al.  Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python , 2011, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[24]  J. Anderson,et al.  IMPROVING GALACTIC CENTER ASTROMETRY BY REDUCING THE EFFECTS OF GEOMETRIC DISTORTION , 2010, 1010.0064.

[25]  Jessica R. Lu,et al.  A DISK OF YOUNG STARS AT THE GALACTIC CENTER AS DETERMINED BY INDIVIDUAL STELLAR ORBITS , 2008, 0808.3818.

[26]  Jessica R. Lu,et al.  Measuring Distance and Properties of the Milky Way’s Central Supermassive Black Hole with Stellar Orbits , 2008, 0808.2870.

[27]  Peter L. Wizinowich,et al.  Upgrading the Keck AO wavefront controllers , 2008, Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[28]  Michael J. Ireland,et al.  Keck Laser Guide Star Adaptive Optics Monitoring of 2MASS J15344984–2952274AB: First Dynamical Mass Determination of a Binary T Dwarf , 2008, 0807.0238.

[29]  V. Kornilov,et al.  Accurate seeing measurements with MASS and DIMM , 2007, 0708.0195.

[30]  Michael Shao,et al.  Extreme adaptive optics for the Thirty Meter Telescope , 2006, SPIE Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[31]  Douglas M. Summers,et al.  The W. M. Keck Observatory Laser Guide Star Adaptive Optics System: Performance Characterization , 2006 .

[32]  Douglas M. Summers,et al.  The W. M. Keck Observatory Laser Guide Star Adaptive Optics System: Overview , 2006 .

[33]  M.,et al.  THE FIRST LASER GUIDE STAR ADAPTIVE OPTICS OBSERVATIONS OF T HE GALACTIC CENTER: SGR A*’S INFRARED COLOR AND THE EXTENDED RED EMISSION IN ITS VICINITY , 2005 .

[34]  Corinna Cortes,et al.  Support-Vector Networks , 1995, Machine Learning.

[35]  Steven M. LaValle,et al.  On the Relationship between Classical Grid Search and Probabilistic Roadmaps , 2004, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[36]  N. Hubin,et al.  New challenges for adaptive optics: extremely large telescopes , 2000, astro-ph/0004065.

[37]  W S McCulloch,et al.  A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity , 1990, The Philosophy of Artificial Intelligence.

[38]  Karl Pearson F.R.S. LIII. On lines and planes of closest fit to systems of points in space , 1901 .