Response Latency: A New Measure for Scaling Brand Preference

A scaling model is presented to estimate brand preference structures by use of response latency or choice time measures. The structure of the model and the predictive validity of the preference scales estimated by this model are tested in the context of a computer-controlled pairwise choice experiment.

[1]  Tyzoon T. Tyebjee.  Choice time and conflict in consumer brand choice behavior , 1976 .

[2]  D. W. Curtis,et al.  Relation between disjunctive reaction time and stimulus difference , 1973 .

[3]  Lewis M. Termann.  Studies in personality , 1942 .

[4]  R. Duncan Luce,et al.  Individual Choice Behavior: A Theoretical Analysis , 1979 .

[5]  W. C. Shipley,et al.  Affective distance and other factors determining reaction time in judgments of color preference , 1945 .

[6]  J. F. Dashiell,et al.  Affective Value-Distances as a Determinant of Esthetic Judgment-Times , 1937 .

[7]  G. Bechtel,et al.  The analysis of variance and pairwise scaling , 1967, Psychometrika.

[8]  N. Anderson.  Functional measurement and psychophysical judgment. , 1970, Psychological review.

[9]  R. Luce,et al.  Individual Choice Behavior: A Theoretical Analysis. , 1960 .

[10]  Donald M. Johnson.  The psychology of thought and judgment , 1956 .

[11]  Forrest W. Young.  Nonmetric scaling of line lengths using latencies, similarity, and same-different judgments , 1970 .

[12]  W N DEMBER.  The relation of decision-time to stimulus similarity. , 1957, Journal of experimental psychology.

[13]  Paul S. Siegel,et al.  Speed of choosing in relation to the preference value of the incentive , 1968 .

[14]  James E. Haefner,et al.  Response Latency: New Measure of Advertising , 1978 .

[15]  Bruce O. Bergum,et al.  Forced-Choice Preferences and Response Latency. , 1969 .

[16]  J G Snodgrass,et al.  Time and Consistency as Measures of Psychological Distance , 1972, Perceptual and motor skills.