A detailed study of the polarity reversal mechanism in a numerical dynamo model

[1] We analyze the mechanism of magnetic polarity reversals in a three- dimensional numerical dynamo model. A dynamo driven by compositional convection in a rotating spherical fluid shell with a solid, electrically conducting inner core exhibits regular reversals of its dominantly axial dipole magnetic field at Rayleigh number Ra = 300, Ekman number E = 0.01, Prandtl number Pr = 1 and Roberts number q = 20. The fluid motions that sustain the field include (1) azimuthal jets which generate toroidal magnetic field; (2) high-latitude, helical convective plumes which generate poloidal magnetic field; and (3) meridional circulation which transports the magnetic field. Inverse poloidal field is produced locally in the convective plumes. Outcrops of reversed field create inverse magnetic flux spots on the core-mantle boundary above the plumes that are precursors to the reversal. The dipole polarity change as seen from the surface occurs when the reversed magnetic flux is distributed over the core-mantle boundary by the meridional circulation. In our model, the reversed flux is transported from south to north and the transitional field has a strong quadrupole component. The duration of the dipole transition is the meridional transport time, and corresponds to a few thousand years in the Earth's core. The duration of the stable polarity epochs depends on several effects, including the strengths of the sources of normal and reversed poloidal field in the plumes, flux transport, and flux diffusion. Comparable reversal periods are found in an equivalent kinematic dynamo model with steady velocities and without Lorentz forces, confirming that these reversals are not triggered by changes in the flow and are primarily magnetic induction effects.

[1]  Gary A. Glatzmaier,et al.  Numerical Simulations of Stellar Convective Dynamos. I. The Model and Method , 1984 .

[2]  A. Cox The frequency of geomagnetic reversals and the symmetry of the nondipole field , 1975 .

[3]  Paul H. Roberts,et al.  Kinematic dynamo models , 1972, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[4]  Rainer Hollerbach ON THE THEORY OF THE GEODYNAMO , 1996 .

[5]  Johannes Wicht Inner-core conductivity in numerical dynamo simulations , 2002 .

[6]  S. Cande,et al.  Revised calibration of the geomagnetic polarity timescale for the Late Cretaceous and Cenozoic , 1995 .

[7]  E. Dormy,et al.  Numerical models of the geodynamo and observational constraints , 2000 .

[8]  C. Jones,et al.  Influence of the Earth's inner core on geomagnetic fluctuations and reversals , 1993, Nature.

[9]  D. Gubbins The distinction between geomagnetic excursions and reversals , 1999 .

[10]  Mioara Mandea,et al.  Small-scale structure of the geodynamo inferred from Oersted and Magsat satellite data , 2002, Nature.

[11]  Cor G. Langereis,et al.  Magnetostratigraphy and astronomical calibration of the last 1.1 Myr from an eastern Mediterranean piston core and dating of short events in the Brunhes , 1997 .

[12]  J. A. JACOBS,et al.  Reversals of the Earth's Magnetic Field , 1971, Nature.

[13]  H. K. Moffatt Magnetic Field Generation in Electrically Conducting Fluids , 1978 .

[14]  Busse,et al.  Hemispherical dynamos generated by convection in rotating spherical shells , 2000, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[15]  C. Constable On rates of occurrence of geomagnetic reversals , 2000 .

[16]  R. Merrill The magnetic field of the earth , 1996 .

[17]  R. Secco,et al.  The electrical resistivity of solid and liquid Fe at pressures up to 7 GPa , 1989 .

[18]  Jeremy Bloxham,et al.  Geomagnetic secular variation , 1989, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[19]  Matthew R. Walker,et al.  Four centuries of geomagnetic secular variation from historical records , 2000, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[20]  C. Jones,et al.  A convection driven geodynamo reversal model , 1999 .

[21]  Keisuke Araki,et al.  Periodic Reversals of Magnetic Field Generated by Thermal Convection in a Rotating Spherical Shell , 1997 .

[22]  Ulrich R. Christensen,et al.  Numerical modelling of the geodynamo: a systematic parameter study , 1999 .

[23]  Masaru Kono,et al.  RECENT GEODYNAMO SIMULATIONS AND OBSERVATIONS OF THE GEOMAGNETIC FIELD , 2002 .

[24]  A. Kageyama,et al.  Flip-Flop Transitions of the Magnetic Intensity and Polarity Reversals in the Magnetohydrodynamic Dynamo , 1999 .

[25]  W. B. Harland,et al.  A Geological Time Scale , 1983 .

[26]  Ronald T. Merrill,et al.  Geomagnetic polarity transitions , 1999 .

[27]  L. Meynadier,et al.  Geomagnetic field intensity and reversals during the past four million years , 1993, Nature.

[28]  C. Jones,et al.  Convection–driven geodynamo models , 2000, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[29]  Carsten Kutzner,et al.  From stable dipolar towards reversing numerical dynamos , 2002 .

[30]  D. Gubbins,et al.  Three-dimensional kinematic dynamos dominated by strong differential rotation , 1996, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[31]  G. Glatzmaier,et al.  An examination of simulated geomagnetic reversals from a palaeomagnetic perspective , 2000, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[32]  Paul H. Roberts,et al.  The role of the Earth's mantle in controlling the frequency of geomagnetic reversals , 1999, Nature.

[33]  David Gubbins,et al.  Mechanism for geomagnetic polarity reversals , 1987, Nature.

[34]  G. Glatzmaier,et al.  A three-dimensional convective dynamo solution with rotating and finitely conducting inner core and mantle , 1995 .