Effects of different flying altitudes on biophysical stand properties estimated from canopy height and density measured with a small-footprint airborne scanning laser

Canopy height distributions were created from small-footprint airborne laser scanner data collected over 133 georeferenced field sample plots and 56 forest stands located in young and mature forest. The plot size was 300–400 m2 and the average stand size was 1.7 ha. Spruce and pine were the dominant tree species. Canopy height distributions were created from both first and last pulse data. The laser data were acquired from two different flying altitudes, i.e., 530–540 and 840–850 m above ground. Height percentiles, mean and maximum height values, coefficients of variation of the heights, and canopy density at different height intervals above the ground were computed from the laser-derived canopy height distributions. Corresponding metrics derived from the two different flying altitudes were compared. Only 1 of 54 metrics derived from the first pulse data differed significantly between flying altitudes. For the last pulse data, the mean values of the height percentiles were up to 50 cm higher than the corresponding values of the low-altitude data. The high-altitude data yielded significantly higher values for most of the canopy density measures. The standard deviation for the differences between high and low flying altitude for each of the metrics was estimated. The standard deviations for the height percentiles ranged from 0.07 to 0.30 cm in the forest stands, indicating a large degree of stability between repeated flight overpasses. The effect of variable flying altitude on mean tree height (hL), stand basal area (G), and stand volume (V) estimated from the laser-derived height and density measures using a two-stage inventory procedure was assessed by randomly combining laser data from the two flying altitudes for each individual sample plot and forest stand. The sample plots were used as training data to calibrate the models. The random assignment was repeated 10,000 times. The results of the 10,000 trials indicated that the precision of the estimated values of hL, G, and V was robust against alterations in flying altitude.

[1]  E. Næsset Practical large-scale forest stand inventory using a small-footprint airborne scanning laser , 2004 .

[2]  E. Næsset,et al.  Estimating tree height and tree crown properties using airborne scanning laser in a boreal nature reserve , 2002 .

[3]  E. Næsset,et al.  Estimating tree heights and number of stems in young forest stands using airborne laser scanner data , 2001 .

[4]  E. Næsset Predicting forest stand characteristics with airborne scanning laser using a practical two-stage procedure and field data , 2002 .

[5]  Rupert G. Miller Simultaneous Statistical Inference , 1966 .

[6]  K. Lim,et al.  Lidar remote sensing of biophysical properties of tolerant northern hardwood forests , 2003 .

[7]  Steen Magnussen,et al.  Recovering Tree Heights from Airborne Laser Scanner Data , 1999, Forest Science.

[8]  T. Eid,et al.  Models for prediction of mortality in even‐aged forest , 2003 .

[9]  H. Braastad,et al.  Growth model computer program for Pinus sylvestris. , 1980 .

[10]  W. W. Carson,et al.  Accuracy of a high-resolution lidar terrain model under a conifer forest canopy , 2003 .

[11]  K. Kraus,et al.  Determination of terrain models in wooded areas with airborne laser scanner data , 1998 .

[12]  J. Holmgren,et al.  Estimation of Tree Height and Stem Volume on Plots Using Airborne Laser Scanning , 2003, Forest Science.

[13]  E. Næsset Determination of mean tree height of forest stands using airborne laser scanner data , 1997 .

[14]  E. Næsset Estimating timber volume of forest stands using airborne laser scanner data , 1997 .

[15]  M. Nilsson Estimation of tree heights and stand volume using an airborne lidar system , 1996 .

[16]  R. Nelson Modeling forest canopy heights: The effects of canopy shape , 1997 .

[17]  S. Magnussen,et al.  Derivations of stand heights from airborne laser scanner data with canopy-based quantile estimators , 1998 .

[18]  W. Cohen,et al.  Surface lidar remote sensing of basal area and biomass in deciduous forests of eastern Maryland, USA , 1999 .

[19]  J. Means Use of Large-Footprint Scanning Airborne Lidar To Estimate Forest Stand Characteristics in the Western Cascades of Oregon , 1999 .

[20]  R. G. Oderwald,et al.  Separating the ground and airborne laser sampling phases to estimate tropical forest basal area, volume, and biomass , 1997 .

[21]  Johan Holmgren,et al.  Estimation of forest variables using airborne laser scanning , 2003 .

[22]  Emmanuel P. Baltsavias,et al.  Airborne laser scanning: existing systems and firms and other resources , 1999 .

[23]  J. Means,et al.  Predicting forest stand characteristics with airborne scanning lidar , 2000 .

[24]  Ross Nelson,et al.  Estimating forest biomass and volume using airborne laser data , 1988 .