On the occurrence of linear groups in proteins

Linear groups—polypeptide conformations based on a single repeating ϕ,ψ‐pair—are a foundational concept in protein structure, yet how they are presented in textbooks is based largely on theoretical studies from the early days of protein structure analysis. Now, ultra‐high resolution protein structures provide a resource for an accurate empirical and systematic assessment of the linear groups that truly exist in proteins. Here, a purely conformation‐based survey of linear groups shows that only three distinct ϕ,ψ‐regions occur: a diverse set of extended conformations mostly present as β‐strands, a broad population of polyproline‐II‐like spirals, and a tight cluster that includes the highly populated α‐helix and the conformationally‐similar but much less populated 310‐helix. Rare, short left‐handed α‐/310‐helical turns with repeating ϕ,ψ‐angles occur, but none are longer than three residues. Misperceptions dispelled by this study are the existence of 2.27‐ and π‐helices as linear groups, the existence of specific ideal ϕ,ψ‐angles for each linear group, and the existence of a substantive difference in the ϕ,ψ‐preferences for parallel versus antiparallel β‐strands. This study provides a concrete basis for updating and enhancing how we think about and teach the basics of protein structure.

[1]  G J Kleywegt,et al.  Phi/psi-chology: Ramachandran revisited. , 1996, Structure.

[2]  T. Weaver The π‐helix translates structure into function , 2008, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[3]  G. N. Ramachandran,et al.  Stereochemistry of polypeptide chain configurations. , 1963, Journal of molecular biology.

[4]  Protein Anatomy,et al.  The Anatomy and Taxonomy of Protein Structure , 2007 .

[5]  L. Pauling,et al.  The pleated sheet, a new layer configuration of polypeptide chains. , 1951, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  W. C. Johnson,et al.  Principles of physical biochemistry , 1998 .

[7]  Janet M. Thornton,et al.  PDBsum more: new summaries and analyses of the known 3D structures of proteins and nucleic acids , 2004, Nucleic Acids Res..

[8]  W. Kabsch,et al.  Dictionary of protein secondary structure: Pattern recognition of hydrogen‐bonded and geometrical features , 1983, Biopolymers.

[9]  K. Nagano,et al.  Logical analysis of the mechanism of protein folding. IV. Super-secondary structures. , 1977, Journal of molecular biology.

[10]  T. Creamer,et al.  Urea promotes polyproline II helix formation: implications for protein denatured states. , 2005, Biochemistry.

[11]  U. Hobohm,et al.  Enlarged representative set of protein structures , 1994, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[12]  J. Donohue,et al.  Hydrogen Bonded Helical Configurations of the Polypeptide Chain. , 1953, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  M. Sternberg,et al.  Left-handed polyproline II helices commonly occur in globular proteins. , 1993, Journal of molecular biology.

[14]  T. Creamer,et al.  Determinants of the polyproline II helix from modeling studies. , 2002, Advances in protein chemistry.

[15]  Arthur M. Lesk,et al.  Introduction to protein architecture : the structural biologyof proteins , 2001 .

[16]  Valerie Daggett,et al.  The intrinsic conformational propensities of the 20 naturally occurring amino acids and reflection of these propensities in proteins , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[17]  P. Karplus Experimentally observed conformation‐dependent geometry and hidden strain in proteins , 1996, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[18]  S. Al-Karadaghi,et al.  Occurrence, conformational features and amino acid propensities for the pi-helix. , 2002, Protein engineering.

[19]  T. Creamer,et al.  A survey of left‐handed polyproline II helices , 2008, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[20]  I. C. O. B. Nomenclature IUPAC-IUB Commission on Biochemical Nomenclature. Abbreviations and symbols for the description of the conformation of polypeptide chains. Tentative rules (1969). , 1970, Biochemistry.

[21]  Robert W Woody,et al.  Is polyproline II a major backbone conformation in unfolded proteins? , 2002, Advances in protein chemistry.

[22]  L. Pauling,et al.  The structure of proteins; two hydrogen-bonded helical configurations of the polypeptide chain. , 1951, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  R. Corey,et al.  Interatomic Distances and Bond Angles in the Polypeptide Chain of Proteins1,2 , 1950 .

[24]  A. Lehninger Principles of Biochemistry , 1984 .

[25]  C. Venkatachalam Stereochemical criteria for polypeptides and proteins. V. Conformation of a system of three linked peptide units , 1968, Biopolymers.

[26]  Edward J. Wood,et al.  Biochemistry (3rd ed.) , 2004 .

[27]  B. W. Low,et al.  THE π HELIX—A HYDROGEN BONDED CONFIGURATION OF THE POLYPEPTIDE CHAIN , 1952 .

[28]  Ian W. Davis,et al.  Structure validation by Cα geometry: ϕ,ψ and Cβ deviation , 2003, Proteins.

[29]  Lauren L. Perskie,et al.  Physical‐chemical determinants of turn conformations in globular proteins , 2007, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[30]  S. Arnott,et al.  The structure of poly-L-proline II. , 1968, Acta crystallographica. Section B: Structural crystallography and crystal chemistry.

[31]  Iupaciubcommissiononbiochemic IUPAC-IUB Commission on Biochemical Nomenclature. Abbreviations and symbols for the description of the conformation of polypeptide chains. , 1971, Journal of molecular biology.

[32]  George D Rose,et al.  Structures, basins, and energies: A deconstruction of the Protein Coil Library , 2008, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.