Retinal Vascular Fractal Dimension Measurement and Its Influence from Imaging Variation: Results of Two Segmentation Methods

Aim: To assess the influences of imaging variation (different photographic angle) on the measurement of retinal vascular fractal dimension (Df), using two segmentation methods. Materials and methods: Nonlinear orthogonal projection segmentation (International Retinal Imaging Software-Fractal, termed IRIS-Fractal) and curvature-based segmentation (Singapore Institute Vessel Assessment-Fractal, termed SIVA-Fractal) methods were used to measure Df and were assessed for their reproducibility in detecting retinal vessels of 30 stereoscopic pairs of optic disc color images. Each pair was taken from the same eye with slightly different angles of incidence. Each photograph of the pairs had subtle variations in brightness between areas temporal and nasal to the optic disc. Results: Intragrader reproducibility of Df measurement was similar (intraclass correlation 0.81 and 0.96, respectively) for IRIS-Fractal and SIVA-Fractal. Within-image pair Pearson’s correlation coefficients (r) of Df measurements were moderate for both methods (0.57 and 0.48, respectively). Conclusions: Both nonlinear orthogonal projection and curvature-based retinal vessel segmentation methods were found to be sensitive to variations in image brightness, resulting from iris shadowing associated with different angle of photographic incidence.

[1]  T. MacGillivray,et al.  Fractal analysis of the retinal vascular network in fundus images , 2007, 2007 29th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[2]  E. Kohner,et al.  Retinal vessel measurement: comparison between observer and computer driven methods , 2004, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[3]  John I. Clark,et al.  Fractal analysis of region-based vascular change in the normal and non-proliferative diabetic retina , 2002, Current eye research.

[4]  Jayanthi Sivaswamy,et al.  Unsupervised curvature-based retinal vessel segmentation , 2007, 2007 4th IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro.

[5]  A. Daxer Characterisation of the neovascularisation process in diabetic retinopathy by means of fractal geometry: diagnostic implications , 1993, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[6]  J. J. Wang,et al.  Prevalence of age-related maculopathy in Australia. The Blue Mountains Eye Study. , 1995, Ophthalmology.

[7]  A. Daxer,et al.  The fractal geometry of proliferative diabetic retinopathy: implications for the diagnosis and the process of retinal vasculogenesis. , 1993, Current eye research.

[8]  R. Kronmal,et al.  Measurement of retinal vascular caliber: issues and alternatives to using the arteriole to venule ratio. , 2007, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[9]  B. Masters,et al.  Fractal analysis of the vascular tree in the human retina. , 2004, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[10]  P. Mitchell,et al.  The retinal vasculature as a fractal: methodology, reliability, and relationship to blood pressure. , 2008, Ophthalmology.

[11]  Mong-Li Lee,et al.  Detection of Retinal Blood Vessels Based on Nonlinear Projections , 2009, J. Signal Process. Syst..

[12]  Paul Mitchell,et al.  The eye in hypertension , 2007, The Lancet.

[13]  Martin A Mainster,et al.  The fractal properties of retinal vessels: Embryological and clinical implications , 1990, Eye.