Use of sexed semen and its effect on conception rate, calf sex, dystocia, and stillbirth of Holsteins in the United States.

Use of sexed semen for artificial insemination of US Holstein heifers (1.3 million breedings) and cows (10.8 million breedings) in Dairy Herd Improvement herds was characterized by breeding year, parity, service number, region, herd size, and herd milk yield. Sexed semen was used for 1.4, 9.5, and 17.8% of all reported breedings for 2006, 2007, and 2008, respectively, for heifers, and for 0.1, 0.2, and 0.4%, respectively, for cows. For 2008 sexed semen breedings, 80.5 and 68.6% of use was for first services of heifers and cows, respectively. For cows, 63.1% of 2008 sexed semen use was for first parity. Mean sexed semen use within herd was the greatest for heifers in the Southwest (36.2%) and for cows in the Mideast (1.3%). Mean sexed semen use increased for heifers but changed little for cows as either herd size or herd mean milk yield increased. Availability of sexed semen was examined for Holstein bulls in active AI service; of 700 bulls born after 1993, 37% had sexed semen marketed by mid August 2009. Active AI bulls with marketed sexed semen were superior to average active AI bulls for evaluations of yield traits, productive life, somatic cell score, daughter pregnancy rate, service-sire calving ease, service-sire stillbirth, final score, sire conception rate, and lifetime net merit. The effect of sexed semen use on conception rate, calf sex, dystocia, and stillbirth also was examined for heifers and cows. Mean conception rate for heifers was 56% for conventional and 39% for sexed semen; corresponding conception rates for cows were 30 and 25%. For single births from sexed semen breedings, around 90% were female. Dystocia and stillbirth were more frequent for heifers (6.0 and 10.4%, respectively, for conventional semen; 4.3 and 11.3%, respectively, for sexed semen) than for cows (2.5 and 3.6%, respectively, for conventional semen; 0.9 and 2.7%, respectively, for sexed semen). Difficult births declined by 28% for heifers and 64% for cows with sexed semen use. Stillbirths were more prevalent for twin births except for sexed semen heifer breedings. Stillbirths of single male calves of heifers were more frequent for breedings with sexed semen (15.6%) than conventional semen (10.8%); a comparable difference was not observed for cows, for which stillbirth frequency of single male calves even decreased (2.6 vs. 3.6%). Overall stillbirth frequency was reduced by sexed semen use for cows but not for heifers.

[1]  B. Brackett,et al.  New Technologies in Animal Breeding , 2012 .

[2]  R. Miller,et al.  Reproductive status of Holstein and Jersey cows in the United States. , 2009, Journal of dairy science.

[3]  D. G. Cran,et al.  Pregnancy rates in heifers and cows with cryopreserved sexed sperm: effects of sperm numbers per inseminate, sorting pressure and sperm storage before sorting. , 2009, Theriogenology.

[4]  R. Nebel,et al.  Evaluating the success of sex-sorted semen in US dairy herds from on farm records. , 2009, Theriogenology.

[5]  M. Peacock,et al.  Danish A.I. field data with sexed semen. , 2009, Theriogenology.

[6]  S. R. Miraei-Ashtiani,et al.  An observational analysis of twin births, calf stillbirth, calf sex ratio, and abortion in Iranian holsteins. , 2008, Journal of dairy science.

[7]  R. Lenz,et al.  Effect of sex-sorted sperm dosage on conception rates in Holstein heifers and lactating cows. , 2008, Journal of dairy science.

[8]  G. Seidel,et al.  History of commercializing sexed semen for cattle. , 2008, Theriogenology.

[9]  K. Leslie,et al.  Exploring the impact of sexed semen on the structure of the dairy industry. , 2008, Journal of dairy science.

[10]  R. Chebel Economic opportunities for sexed semen on commercial dairies Western Dairy News is a collaborative effort of Dairy Specialists from : , 2008 .

[11]  R. Cushman,et al.  Increased calf production in cattle selected for twin ovulations. , 2007, Journal of animal science.

[12]  G. Seidel Overview of sexing sperm. , 2007, Theriogenology.

[13]  M. Cassandro,et al.  A field study on fertility and purity of sex-sorted cattle sperm. , 2007, Journal of dairy science.

[14]  C. Wolf,et al.  Expected net present value of pure and mixed sexed semen artificial insemination strategies in dairy heifers. , 2007, Journal of dairy science.

[15]  J E Lombard,et al.  Impacts of dystocia on health and survival of dairy calves. , 2007, Journal of dairy science.

[16]  S. Schnell,et al.  Genetic impacts of using female-sorted semen in commercial and nucleus herds. , 2007, Journal of dairy science.

[17]  M. Hässig,et al.  Fertility in heifers and cows after low dose insemination with sex-sorted and non-sorted sperm under field conditions. , 2005, Theriogenology.

[18]  H. Norman,et al.  Duration of herd participation in dairy herd improvement milk recording in the United States. , 2004, Journal of dairy science.

[19]  K. Weigel Exploring the Role of Sexed Semen in Dairy Production Systems , 2004 .

[20]  G E Seidel,et al.  Characteristics of calves produced with sperm sexed by flow cytometry/cell sorting. , 2004, Journal of animal science.

[21]  G. Wiggans,et al.  Implementation of a sire-maternal grandsire model for evaluation of calving ease in the United States. , 2003, Journal of dairy science.

[22]  G. Seidel Economics of selecting for sex: the most important genetic trait. , 2003, Theriogenology.

[23]  D. G. Cran,et al.  Insemination of heifers with sexed sperm. , 1999, Theriogenology.

[24]  R. P. Amann Issues affecting commercialization of sexed sperm. , 1999, Theriogenology.

[25]  R. Pearson,et al.  The effects of inbreeding on the lifetime performance of dairy cattle. , 1998, Journal of dairy science.

[26]  L. Johnson,et al.  Sex preselection in rabbits: live births from X and Y sperm separated by DNA and cell sorting. , 1989, Biology of reproduction.

[27]  L. D. Vleck 12 – Potential Genetic Impact of Artificial Insemination, Sex Selection, Embryo Transfer, Cloning, and Selfing in Dairy Cattle , 1981 .