Online Regenerator Placement

Connections between nodes in optical networks are realized by lightpaths. Due to the decay of the signal, a regenerator has to be placed on every lightpath after at most d hops, for some given positive integer d. A regenerator can serve only one lightpath. The placement of regenerators has become an active area of research during recent years, and various optimization problems have been studied. The first such problem is the Regeneration Location Problem (Rlp), where the goal is to place the regenerators so as to minimize the total number of nodes containing them. We consider two extreme cases of online Rlp regarding the value of d and the number k of regenerators that can be used in any single node. (1) d is arbitrary and k unbounded. In this case a feasible solution always exists. We show an O(log|X|⋅ logd)-competitive randomized algorithm for any network topology, where X is the set of paths of length d. The algorithm can be made deterministic in some cases. We show a deterministic lower bound of Ωlog(|E|/d)⋅logdlog(log(|E|/d)⋅logd)${\Omega } \left (\frac {\log (|{E}|/d) \cdot \log d}{\log (\log (|{E}|/d) \cdot \log d)}\right )$, where E is the edge set. (2) d = 2 and k = 1. In this case there is not necessarily a solution for a given input. We distinguish between feasible inputs (for which there is a solution) and infeasible ones. In the latter case, the objective is to satisfy the maximum number of lightpaths. For a path topology we show a lower bound of l/2$\sqrt {l}/2$ for the competitive ratio (where l is the number of internal nodes of the longest lightpath) on infeasible inputs, and a tight bound of 3 for the competitive ratio on feasible inputs.

[1]  Noga Alon,et al.  The online set cover problem , 2003, STOC '03.

[2]  Gianpiero Monaco,et al.  Optimizing regenerator cost in traffic grooming , 2011, Theor. Comput. Sci..

[3]  Byrav Ramamurthy,et al.  Dynamic routing in translucent WDM optical networks , 2002, 2002 IEEE International Conference on Communications. Conference Proceedings. ICC 2002 (Cat. No.02CH37333).

[4]  Byrav Ramamurthy,et al.  Sparse Regeneration in Translucent Wavelength-Routed Optical Networks: Architecture, Network Design and Wavelength Routing , 2005, Photonic Network Communications.

[5]  Shmuel Zaks,et al.  Placing Regenerators in Optical Networks to Satisfy Multiple Sets of Requests , 2012, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking.

[6]  N. Golmie,et al.  Static vs. dynamic regenerator assignment in optical switches: models and cost trade-offs , 2004, 2004 Workshop on High Performance Switching and Routing, 2004. HPSR..

[7]  Elio Salvadori,et al.  Traffic independent heuristics for regenerator site selection for providing any-to-any optical connectivity , 2010, 2010 Conference on Optical Fiber Communication (OFC/NFOEC), collocated National Fiber Optic Engineers Conference.

[8]  Seung-Woo Seo,et al.  Regenerator placement algorithms for connection establishment in all-optical networks , 2000, Globecom '00 - IEEE. Global Telecommunications Conference. Conference Record (Cat. No.00CH37137).

[9]  Si Chen,et al.  The regenerator location problem , 2010, Networks.

[10]  S Pachnicke,et al.  Physical Impairment Based Regenerator Placement and Routing in Translucent Optical Networks , 2008, OFC/NFOEC 2008 - 2008 Conference on Optical Fiber Communication/National Fiber Optic Engineers Conference.

[11]  Allan Borodin,et al.  Online computation and competitive analysis , 1998 .

[12]  Gianpiero Monaco,et al.  On the Complexity of the Regenerator Placement Problem in Optical Networks , 2011, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking.