Trade-Off Between Field-of-View and Resolution in the Thermal-Integrated Argus II System

Purpose To investigate the effect of a wider field-of-view (FOV) of a retinal prosthesis on the users' performance in locating objects. Methods One female and four male subjects who were blind due to end-stage retinitis pigmentosa and had been implanted with the Argus II retinal prosthesis participated (aged 63.4 ± 15.4). Thermal imaging was captured by an external sensor and converted to electrical stimulation to the retina. Subjects were asked to localize and to reach for heat-emitting objects using two different FOV mappings: a normal 1:1 mapping (no zoom) that provided 18° × 11° FOV and a 3:1 mapping (zoom out) that provided 49° × 35° FOV. Their accuracy and response time were recorded. Results Subjects were less accurate and took longer to complete the tasks with zoom out compared to no zoom. Localization accuracy decreased from 83% (95% confidence interval, 75%, 90%) with no zoom to 76% (67%, 83%) with zoom out (P = 0.07). Reaching accuracy differed between the two mappings only in one subject. Response time increased by 43% for the localization task (24%, 66%; P < 0.001) and by 20% for the reaching task (0%, 45%; P = 0.055). Conclusions Argus II wearers can efficiently find heat-emitting objects with the default 18° × 11° FOV of the current Argus II. For spatial localization, a higher spatial resolution may be preferred over a wider FOV. Translational Relevance Understanding the trade-off between FOV and spatial resolution in retinal prosthesis users can guide device optimization.

[1]  D. Bates,et al.  Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-PLUS , 2001 .

[2]  Jessy D. Dorn,et al.  Improvements in vision‐related quality of life in blind patients implanted with the Argus II Epiretinal Prosthesis , 2016, Clinical & experimental optometry.

[3]  E. Ring,et al.  Infrared thermal imaging in medicine , 2012, Physiological measurement.

[4]  Gislin Dagnelie,et al.  Performance of real‐world functional vision tasks by blind subjects improves after implantation with the Argus® II retinal prosthesis system , 2016, Clinical & experimental ophthalmology.

[5]  Julian J. Faraway,et al.  Extending the Linear Model with R , 2004 .

[6]  N Drasdo,et al.  A pilot study on the use of visual field expanders. , 1978, The British journal of physiological optics.

[7]  Yvonne Hsu-Lin Luo,et al.  The use of Argus® II retinal prosthesis by blind subjects to achieve localisation and prehension of objects in 3-dimensional space , 2015, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[8]  M. Levin,et al.  A Field Expander for Patients with Retinitis Pigmentosa: A Clinical Study , 1977, American journal of optometry and physiological optics.

[9]  Gislin Dagnelie,et al.  Five-Year Safety and Performance Results from the Argus II Retinal Prosthesis System Clinical Trial. , 2016, Ophthalmology.

[10]  Jessy D. Dorn,et al.  Blind subjects implanted with the Argus II retinal prosthesis are able to improve performance in a spatial-motor task , 2010, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[11]  Erica M. Barhorst-Cates,et al.  The Effects of Restricted Peripheral Field-of-View on Spatial Learning while Navigating , 2016, PloS one.

[12]  Nan Zhu,et al.  Single camera imaging system for color and near-infrared fluorescence image guided surgery , 2014, Biomedical optics express.

[13]  Jessy D. Dorn,et al.  Factors Affecting Perceptual Threshold in Argus II Retinal Prosthesis Subjects. , 2013, Translational vision science & technology.

[14]  Gislin Dagnelie,et al.  Eye Movement Control in the Argus II Retinal-Prosthesis Enables Reduced Head Movement and Better Localization Precision. , 2018, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[15]  Ronald G. Driggers,et al.  Current infrared target acquisition approach for military sensor design and wargaming , 2006, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[16]  J. L. Elliott,et al.  Visual Correlates of Obstacle Avoidance in Adults with Low Vision , 1998, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[17]  K. Turano,et al.  Mobility performance in glaucoma. , 1999, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[18]  Rong Liu,et al.  Compensation for Blur Requires Increase in Field of View and Viewing Time , 2016, PloS one.

[19]  Jessy D. Dorn,et al.  The Argus II epiretinal prosthesis system allows letter and word reading and long-term function in patients with profound vision loss , 2013, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[20]  Yue Wang,et al.  The impact of mild, moderate, and severe visual field loss in glaucoma on patients’ quality of life measured via the Glaucoma Quality of Life-15 Questionnaire , 2017, Medicine.

[21]  Ali Al Shaghthrah.  A Study to Develop a New Clinical Measure to Assess Visual Awareness in Tunnel Vision , 2014 .

[22]  Rune Haubo,et al.  A Tutorial on fitting Cumulative Link Mixed Models with clmm2 from the ordinal Package , 2013 .

[23]  Yvonne Hsu-Lin Luo,et al.  The Argus II Retinal Prosthesis System , 2019, Prosthesis.

[24]  Stanislao Rizzo,et al.  The Argus II Retinal Prosthesis: 12-month outcomes from a single-study center. , 2014, American journal of ophthalmology.

[25]  Gislin Dagnelie,et al.  Use of the Argus II retinal prosthesis to improve visual guidance of fine hand movements. , 2012, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[26]  S. Haymes,et al.  Mobility of People with Retinitis Pigmentosa as a Function of Vision and Psychological Variables , 1996, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[27]  D. Jayas,et al.  Applications of Thermal Imaging in Agriculture and Food Industry—A Review , 2011 .