Runoff prediction errors and bias in parameter estimation induced by spatial variability of precipitation

Spatial variability of precipitation causes inflated mean squared errors of prediction in precipitation-runoff modeling. One component of these larger errors is a bias, which often takes the form of over-prediction for large events and underprediction for small events. This problem is examined using an assumed stochastic structure for the spatial behavior of rainfall together with a form of the Green-Ampt infiltration equation for prediction of storm runoff volume. The stochastic rainfall model incorporates the nonstationarity and spatial correlation exhibited by actual rainfall. The bias in runoff prediction causes parameter estimates obtained by least squares calibration to be asymptotically biased. The magnitude and direction of the bias depends on the interaction between the runoff prediction bias and the sensitivity of predicted runoff to changes in parameter values. Numerous climatic and hydrologic factors exercise an influence on this interaction.

[1]  I. Rodríguez‐Iturbe,et al.  The design of rainfall networks in time and space , 1974 .

[2]  George Kuczera,et al.  On the relationship between the reliability of parameter estimates and hydrologic time series data used in calibration , 1982 .

[3]  J. Schaake,et al.  Parametric-Deterministic Urban Watershed Model , 1980 .

[4]  Lucien Duckstein,et al.  Point Rainfall Frequencies in Convective Storms , 1969 .

[5]  J. Philip,et al.  AN INFILTRATION EQUATION WITH PHYSICAL SIGNIFICANCE , 1954 .

[6]  Juan B. Valdés,et al.  On the influence of the spatial distribution of rainfall on storm runoff , 1979 .

[7]  Ignacio Rodriguez-Iturbe,et al.  Rainfall generation: A nonstationary time‐varying multidimensional model , 1976 .

[8]  Jose M. Mejia,et al.  Correlation links between normal and log normal processes , 1974 .

[9]  Ignacio Rodriguez-Iturbe,et al.  Network design for the estimation of areal mean of rainfall events , 1976 .

[10]  H. White Consequences and Detection of Misspecified Nonlinear Regression Models , 1981 .

[11]  A. Madansky The fitting of straight lines when both variables are subject to error , 1959 .

[12]  Robert B. Davies,et al.  The effect of errors in the independent variables in linear regression , 1975 .

[13]  A. Baddeley A limit theorem for statistics of spatial data , 1980, Advances in Applied Probability.

[14]  Jose M. Mejia,et al.  On the transformation of point rainfall to areal rainfall , 1974 .

[15]  W. R. Buckland,et al.  Distributions in Statistics: Continuous Multivariate Distributions , 1973 .

[16]  D. Dawdy,et al.  A rainfall-runoff simulation model for estimation of flood peaks for small drainage basins , 1972 .

[17]  Brent M. Troutman,et al.  An analysis of input errors in precipitation‐runoff models using regression with errors in the independent variables , 1982 .

[18]  G. H. Leavesley,et al.  Precipitation-runoff modeling system; user's manual , 1983 .

[19]  V. Gupta,et al.  The mathematical structure of rainfall representations: 1. A review of the stochastic rainfall models , 1981 .

[20]  V. Gupta,et al.  A stochastic kinematic study of subsynoptic space‐time rainfall , 1979 .

[21]  Soronadi Nnaji,et al.  The Information Needed to Evaluate the Worth of Uncertain Information, Predictions and Forecasts , 1982 .

[22]  D. V. Lindley,et al.  Regression Lines and the Linear Functional Relationship , 1947 .

[23]  M. C. Boyer A correlation of the characteristics of great storms , 1957 .

[24]  Franklin A. Graybill,et al.  Theory and Application of the Linear Model , 1976 .