Traffic-light front-of-pack environmental labelling across food categories triggers more environmentally friendly food choices: a randomised controlled trial in virtual reality supermarket

[1]  G. Trystram,et al.  Implementing environmental labelling of food products in France , 2022, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[2]  P. Stern,et al.  Revisiting the promise of carbon labelling , 2022, Nature Climate Change.

[3]  Bernadette Sütterlin,et al.  Consumers’ knowledge gain through a cross-category environmental label , 2021 .

[4]  G. Arvisenet,et al.  An Exploratory Study Combining Eye-Tracking and Virtual Reality: Are Pulses Good “Eye-Catchers” in Virtual Supermarket Shelves? , 2021, Frontiers in Virtual Reality.

[5]  Vranken Liesbet,et al.  A combined Nutri-Score and ‘Eco-Score’ approach for more nutritious and more environmentally friendly food choices? Evidence from a consumer experiment in Belgium , 2021 .

[6]  S. Grasso,et al.  Consumers behaviour towards carbon footprint labels on food: A review of the literature and discussion of industry implications , 2021 .

[7]  Xiang Li,et al.  Less Is Better: How Nutrition and Low-Carbon Labels Jointly Backfire on the Evaluation of Food Products , 2021, Nutrients.

[8]  F. Tubiello,et al.  Food systems are responsible for a third of global anthropogenic GHG emissions , 2021, Nature Food.

[9]  M. Rayner,et al.  The Effects of Environmental Sustainability Labels on Selection, Purchase, and Consumption of Food and Drink Products: A Systematic Review , 2021, Environment and behavior.

[10]  Carmen Valor,et al.  Designed to Be Noticed: A Reconceptualization of Carbon Food Labels as Warning Labels , 2021, Sustainability.

[11]  W. Abrahamse.  How to Effectively Encourage Sustainable Food Choices: A Mini-Review of Available Evidence , 2020, Frontiers in Psychology.

[12]  I. Azevedo,et al.  Global food system emissions could preclude achieving the 1.5° and 2°C climate change targets , 2020, Science.

[13]  Z. Szakály,et al.  A Comprehensive Review of the Benefits of and the Barriers to the Switch to a Plant-Based Diet , 2020, Sustainability.

[14]  Anwar Sadat Shimul,et al.  Drivers and barriers toward reducing meat consumption , 2020, Appetite.

[15]  B. Neal,et al.  Front-of-pack nutrition labelling to promote healthier diets: current practice and opportunities to strengthen regulation worldwide , 2019, BMJ Global Health.

[16]  E. Trolle,et al.  Dietary choices and environmental impact in four European countries , 2019, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[17]  David Tilman,et al.  Multiple health and environmental impacts of foods , 2019, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[18]  G. Arvisenet,et al.  A central place for meat, but what about pulses? Studying French consumers' representations of main dish structure, using an indirect approach. , 2019, Food research international.

[19]  Gabriele Pizzi,et al.  Virtual reality, real reactions?: Comparing consumers' perceptions and shopping orientation across physical and virtual-reality retail stores , 2019, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[20]  W. Willett,et al.  Food in the Anthropocene: the EAT–Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems , 2019, The Lancet.

[21]  Adrian R. Camilleri,et al.  Consumers underestimate the emissions associated with food but are aided by labels , 2018, Nature Climate Change.

[22]  P. Scarborough,et al.  Health and nutritional aspects of sustainable diet strategies and their association with environmental impacts: a global modelling analysis with country-level detail , 2018, The Lancet. Planetary health.

[23]  W. Willett,et al.  Options for keeping the food system within environmental limits , 2018, Nature.

[24]  Carlos Orús,et al.  Impulse buying behaviour: an online-offline comparative and the impact of social media , 2018 .

[25]  Andreas Kunz,et al.  Consumers' food selection behaviors in three-dimensional (3D) virtual reality. , 2018, Food research international.

[26]  Christina Hartmann,et al.  Consumer perception and behaviour regarding sustainable protein consumption: A systematic review , 2017 .

[27]  Tian Yu,et al.  Can a virtual supermarket bring realism into the lab? Comparing shopping behavior using virtual and pictorial store representations to behavior in a physical store , 2016, Appetite.

[28]  Kristian Steensen Nielsen,et al.  A better carbon footprint label , 2016 .

[29]  J. Macdiarmid,et al.  Eating like there's no tomorrow: Public awareness of the environmental impact of food and reluctance to eat less meat as part of a sustainable diet , 2016, Appetite.

[30]  Yannan Jiang,et al.  Using a 3D Virtual Supermarket to Measure Food Purchase Behavior: A Validation Study , 2015, Journal of medical Internet research.

[31]  Liesbet Vranken,et al.  Food Labeling and Eco-Friendly Consumption: Experimental Evidence From a Belgian Supermarket , 2014 .

[32]  Jonathon P. Schuldt,et al.  Does Green Mean Healthy? Nutrition Label Color Affects Perceptions of Healthfulness , 2013, Health communication.

[33]  Heather Barnes Truelove,et al.  Perceptions of behaviors that cause and mitigate global warming and intentions to perform these behaviors , 2012 .

[34]  S. Michie,et al.  The behaviour change wheel: A new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions , 2011, Implementation science : IS.

[35]  Svetlana Bialkova,et al.  What determines consumer attention to nutrition labels , 2010 .

[36]  Mahmood Saghaei,et al.  Random allocation software for parallel group randomized trials , 2004, BMC medical research methodology.

[37]  Zampori Luca,et al.  Suggestions for updating the Product Environmental Footprint (PEF) method , 2019 .

[38]  M. Siegrist,et al.  Virtual reality and immersive approaches to contextual food testing , 2019, Context.

[39]  Qunwei Wang,et al.  A review of carbon labeling: Standards, implementation, and impact , 2016 .

[40]  Hilde van der Togt,et al.  Publisher's Note , 2003, J. Netw. Comput. Appl..