Multi‐attribute analysis of investments risk alternatives in construction

Abstract In project development it is hardly possible to get exhaustive and accurate information. As a result, the situations occur, the consequences of which can be very damaging to the project. Inaccurate evaluation of the strategy related to capital investment and project implementation is one of the reasons why such estimates are not required in practice. Instead, a classification approaches may be used for this purpose. The decision‐making process, based on the established risk assessment principles expressed in linguistic terms, requires qualitative judgement and experiential knowledge of the construction experts. Presented structured and realistic methods deals systematically with different risk management situations and assist the investors in reaching the correct risk assessment of possible alternatives will be of great value. This paper presents a methods of multiattribute comparativite analysis (CLARA and SAW methods) of variants of investment classified risks in construction. A practical case ...

[1]  Leonas Ustinovichius,et al.  Classification of the Investment Risk in Construction , 2007, CDVE.

[2]  Matthias Ehrgott,et al.  Multiple criteria decision analysis: state of the art surveys , 2005 .

[3]  Leonas Ustinovičius,et al.  Verbal analysis of the investment risk in construction , 2003 .

[4]  E. Zavadskas,et al.  Application of a quantitative multiple criteria decision making (MCDM-1) approach to the analysis of investments in construction , 2007 .

[5]  E. Zavadskas,et al.  Defining the utility and market value of a real estate: A multiple criteria approach , 2007 .

[6]  Evangelos,et al.  [Applied Optimization] Multi-criteria Decision Making Methods: A Comparative Study Volume 44 || A Computational Evaluation of the Original and the Revised AHP , 2000 .

[7]  Egidijus Rytas Vaidogas.  Risk Oriented Design of Protective Highway Structures , 2007 .

[8]  T. Saaty.  Highlights and critical points in the theory and application of the Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1994 .

[9]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  A multiple criteria evaluation of multi-family apartment block's maintenance contractors: I—Model for maintenance contractor evaluation and the determination of its selection criteria , 2006 .

[10]  Leonas Ustinovichius,et al.  Determination of efficiency of investments in construction , 2004 .

[11]  Galina Shevchenko,et al.  Verbal Analysis of Renovation Investment Strategy of Old Town , 2008 .

[12]  Darius Migilinskas,et al.  Verbal Analysis of Risk Elements in Construction Contracts , 2006, CDVE.

[13]  Valentinas Podvezko,et al.  Multicriteria Evaluation Under Uncertainty , 2006 .

[14]  Zenonas Turskis,et al.  Multi-attribute model for estimation of retail centres influence on the city structure. Kaunas city case study , 2006 .

[15]  Milda Viteikiene,et al.  Sustainable residential areas evaluation , 2006 .

[16]  Zenonas Turskis,et al.  Multi‐attribute contractors ranking method by applying ordering of feasible alternatives of solutions in terms of preferability technique , 2008 .

[17]  E. Zavadskas,et al.  Evaluating the sustainability of vilnius city residential areas , 2007 .

[18]  Leonas Ustinovichius,et al.  Multiattribute Analysis of Investment Risks in Construction , 2008 .

[19]  Allan D. Shocker,et al.  Linear programming techniques for multidimensional analysis of preferences , 1973 .

[20]  Zenonas Turskis,et al.  EVALUATION OF CONSTRUCTION SUSTAINABILITY BY MULTIPLE CRITERIA METHODS , 2006 .

[21]  Jurgita Antucheviciene,et al.  Evaluation of Ranking Accuracy in Multi-Criteria Decisions , 2006, Informatica.

[22]  David Arditi,et al.  Perceptions of Process Quality in Building Projects , 1999 .

[23]  Hassan Ziari,et al.  INTERFACE CONDITION INFLUENCE ON PREDICTION OF FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT LIFE , 2007 .

[24]  Romualdas Ginevičius,et al.  Normalization of quantities of various dimensions , 2008 .

[25]  Oleg I. Larichev,et al.  Decision support system for classification of a finite set of multicriteria alternatives , 2002, Decis. Support Syst..

[26]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  Sustainable city compactness evaluation on the basis of GIS and bayes rule , 2006 .

[27]  R. Tamošiūnienė,et al.  The Multicriterial Evaluation Method of the Effectiveness of the Investment Projects , 2006 .