An Analysis of Incentive Structures in Collaborative Economy: An Application to Crowdfunding Platform

A crucial aspect to the functioning of the collaborative economy is the incentive structure that encourages participation. The objective of our research is to understand the impact of project reward structure (PRS), one form of incentives, on backers’ pledging decisions during projects’ funding period. To motivate the structural analysis, we first present a project-level reduced-form model to investigate the impact of the reward structure on project outcomes. From that, we find that dynamically modifying reward structures during project funding process has significantly positive impacts on influencing the project outcomes. We then develop a structural model to investigate how reward structures affect the reward-level decision making process by using a panel data. We found that reward levels that have been popular options till date or that have gained recent popularity are perceived to be more favorable if they are pushed lower down the menu of options, presumably by introducing weaker or less attractive options ahead of them in the menu. This implies that project creators do need to strategically design the PRS to attract more backers.

[1]  Inseong Song,et al.  A Micromodel of New Product Adoption with Heterogeneous and Forward-Looking Consumers: Application to the Digital Camera Category , 2003 .

[2]  Siva Viswanathan,et al.  Judging Borrowers by the Company They Keep: Friendship Networks and Information Asymmetry in Online Peer-to-Peer Lending , 2011, Manag. Sci..

[3]  E. Fehr,et al.  Altruistic punishment in humans , 2002, Nature.

[4]  Stephan Meier,et al.  Another Hidden Cost of Incentives: The Detrimental Effect on Norm Enforcement , 2009, Manag. Sci..

[5]  Hossein Ghasemkhani The Invisible Value of Information Systems: Reputation Building in an Online P2P Lending System , 2013 .

[6]  D. Jain,et al.  Product‐Line Length as a Competitive Tool , 2005 .

[7]  A. Tversky,et al.  Context-dependent preferences , 1993 .

[8]  Pradeep K. Chintagunta,et al.  Temporal Differences in the Role of Marketing Communication in New Product Categories , 2005 .

[9]  Anindya Ghose,et al.  An Empirical Examination of the Antecedents and Consequences of Contribution Patterns in Crowd-Funded Markets , 2013, Inf. Syst. Res..

[10]  Matthew Shum,et al.  An empirical model of learning and patient spillovers in new drug entry , 2004 .

[11]  Michael Luca,et al.  Digital Discrimination: The Case of Airbnb.com , 2014 .

[12]  U. Gneezy,et al.  Journal of Economic Perspectives—Volume 25, Number 4—Fall 2011—Pages 191–210 When and Why Incentives (Don’t) Work to Modify Behavior , 2022 .

[13]  Rick L. Andrews,et al.  Strategic Herding Behavior in Peer-to-Peer Loan Auctions , 2010 .

[14]  S. Viswanathan,et al.  Judging Borrowers by the Company They Keep : Social Networks and Adverse Selection in Online Peer-to-Peer Lending , 2009 .

[15]  J. M. Villas-Boas,et al.  Endogeneity in Brand Choice Models , 1999 .

[16]  Matthew J. Hashim,et al.  Information Feedback, Targeting, and Coordination: An Experimental Study , 2016, Inf. Syst. Res..

[17]  Harikesh S. Nair,et al.  Intertemporal price discrimination with forward-looking consumers: Application to the US market for console video-games , 2006 .

[18]  Dipak C. Jain,et al.  Consumer Preferences and Product-Line Pricing Strategies: An Empirical Analysis , 2006 .

[19]  Y. Trope,et al.  Construal Levels and Psychological Distance: Effects on Representation, Prediction, Evaluation, and Behavior. , 2007, Journal of consumer psychology : the official journal of the Society for Consumer Psychology.

[20]  Peng Liu,et al.  Rational Herding in Microloan Markets , 2012, Manag. Sci..

[21]  Michael Luca,et al.  Digital Discrimination: The Case of Airbnb.com , 2014 .