Lokomat guided gait in hemiparetic stroke patients: the effects of training parameters on muscle activity and temporal symmetry

Abstract Purpose: The Lokomat is a commercially available robotic gait trainer, applied for gait rehabilitation in post-stroke hemiparetic patients. Selective and well-dosed clinical use of the Lokomat training parameters, i.e. guidance, speed and bodyweight support, requires a good understanding of how these parameters affect the neuromuscular control of post-stroke hemiparetic gait. Materials and methods: Ten stroke patients (unilateral paresis, 7 females, 64.5 ± 6.4 years, >3months post-stroke, FAC scores 2–4)) walked in the Lokomat under varying parameter settings: 50% or 100% guidance, 0.28 or 0.56m/s, 0% or 50% bodyweight support. Electromyography was recorded bilaterally from Gluteus Medius, Biceps Femoris, Vastus Lateralis, Medial Gastrocnemius, and Tibialis Anterior. Pressure sensors placed under the feet were used to determine the level of temporal gait symmetry. Results: Varying guidance and bodyweight support had little effect on muscle activity, but increasing treadmill speed led to increased activity in both the affected (Biceps Femoris, Medial Gastrocnemius, Tibialis Anterior) and unaffected leg (all muscles). The level of temporal symmetry was unaffected by the parameter settings. Conclusions: The Lokomat training parameters are generally ineffective in shaping short term muscle activity and step symmetry patients with hemiparetic stroke, as speed is the only parameter that significantly affects muscular amplitude. Trial Registration: d.n.a. IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATION The Lokomat is a commercially available gait trainer that can be used for gait rehabilitation in post-stroke hemiparetic patients. This study shows that muscle amplitude is generally low during Lokomat guided walking, and that treadmill Speed is the main training parameter to influence muscular output in stroke patients during Lokomat walking. Varying Guidance and Bodyweight Support within a clinical relevant range barely affected muscle activity, and temporal step symmetry was unaffected by variation in any of the training parameters. Based on the findings it is advised to increase speed as early as possible during Lokomat therapy, or use other means (e.g. feedback or instructions) to stimulate active involvement of patients during training.

[1]  Robert Riener,et al.  Locomotor training in subjects with sensori-motor deficits: An overview of the robotic gait orthosis lokomat , 2010 .

[2]  J Duysens,et al.  Abnormalities in the temporal patterning of lower extremity muscle activity in hemiparetic gait. , 2007, Gait & posture.

[3]  V. Dietz,et al.  Interlimb coordination of posture in patients with spastic paresis. Impaired function of spinal reflexes. , 1984, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[4]  R. Riener,et al.  Patient-cooperative strategies for robot-aided treadmill training: first experimental results , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[5]  C. Richards,et al.  Coactivation during gait as an adaptive behavior after stroke. , 2000, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[6]  R. Riener,et al.  A Method of Estimating the Degree of Active Participation During Stepping in a Driven Gait Orthosis Based on Actuator Force Profile Matching , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[7]  F. Lacquaniti,et al.  Control of foot trajectory in human locomotion: role of ground contact forces in simulated reduced gravity. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[8]  Sheng Quan Xie,et al.  Robot assisted treadmill training: mechanisms and training strategies. , 2011, Medical engineering & physics.

[9]  J. Duysens,et al.  Speed related changes in muscle activity from normal to very slow walking speeds. , 2004, Gait & posture.

[10]  Dario Farina,et al.  Effects of robotic guidance on the coordination of locomotion , 2013, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[11]  Wolzt,et al.  World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. , 2003, The Journal of the American College of Dentists.

[12]  M. Thaut,et al.  Rhythmic facilitation of gait training in hemiparetic stroke rehabilitation , 1997, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[13]  Stefan Hesse,et al.  Treadmill Training with Partial Body Weight Support: Influence of Body Weight Release on the Gait of Hemiparetic Patients , 1997 .

[14]  N. Crabtree,et al.  Ambulatory level and asymmetrical weight bearing after stroke affects bone loss in the upper and lower part of the femoral neck differently: bone adaptation after decreased mechanical loading. , 2000, Bone.

[15]  Felix E Zajac,et al.  Gait deviations associated with post-stroke hemiparesis: improvement during treadmill walking using weight support, speed, support stiffness, and handrail hold. , 2005, Gait & posture.

[16]  Pieter Coenen,et al.  Robot-assisted walking vs overground walking in stroke patients: an evaluation of muscle activity. , 2012, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[17]  Robert Riener,et al.  Patient-cooperative control increases active participation of individuals with SCI during robot-aided gait training , 2010, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[18]  K. M. Gill,et al.  Clinical Gait Assessment in the Neurologically Impaired , 1984 .

[19]  R. Müller,et al.  Leg surface electromyography patterns in children with neuro-orthopedic disorders walking on a treadmill unassisted and assisted by a robot with and without encouragement , 2012, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[20]  H. Barbeau,et al.  Influence of body weight support on normal human gait: development of a gait retraining strategy. , 1991, Physical therapy.

[21]  L. Cohen,et al.  Role of voluntary drive in encoding an elementary motor memory. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[22]  Titianova Eb,et al.  Asymmetry in walking performance and postural sway in patients with chronic unilateral cerebral infarction. , 1995 .

[23]  J. Hidler,et al.  Alterations in muscle activation patterns during robotic-assisted walking. , 2005, Clinical biomechanics.

[24]  V. L. Nickel,et al.  Gait parameters following stroke: a practical assessment. , 1995, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[25]  Carmen Krewer,et al.  The influence of different Lokomat walking conditions on the energy expenditure of hemiparetic patients and healthy subjects. , 2007, Gait & posture.

[26]  Thad W. Buster,et al.  Partial body weight support treadmill training speed influences paretic and non-paretic leg muscle activation, stride characteristics, and ratings of perceived exertion during acute stroke rehabilitation. , 2016, Human movement science.

[27]  Jacob J. Bloomberg,et al.  Plantar tactile perturbations enhance transfer of split-belt locomotor adaptation , 2015, Experimental Brain Research.

[28]  J. Perry,et al.  Gait Analysis , 2024 .

[29]  V. Dietz,et al.  Treadmill training of paraplegic patients using a robotic orthosis. , 2000, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[30]  Kara K. Patterson,et al.  Evaluation of gait symmetry after stroke: a comparison of current methods and recommendations for standardization. , 2010, Gait & posture.

[31]  S. Olney,et al.  Hemiparetic gait following stroke. Part I: Characteristics , 1996 .

[32]  R. Riener,et al.  Journal of Neuroengineering and Rehabilitation Open Access Biofeedback for Robotic Gait Rehabilitation , 2022 .

[33]  Robert Riener,et al.  Virtual Gait Training for Children with Cerebral Palsy using the Lokomat Gait Orthosis , 2008, MMVR.

[34]  J. Fung,et al.  Faster Is Better: Implications for Speed-Intensive Gait Training After Stroke , 2004, Stroke.

[35]  S Hesse,et al.  Treadmill walking with partial body weight support versus floor walking in hemiparetic subjects. , 1999, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[36]  Maarten J. IJzerman,et al.  Recovery of Gait After Stroke: What Changes? , 2008, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[37]  Robert Riener,et al.  Influence of virtual reality soccer game on walking performance in robotic assisted gait training for children , 2010, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[38]  R. Riener,et al.  Path Control: A Method for Patient-Cooperative Robot-Aided Gait Rehabilitation , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[39]  T. Hornby,et al.  Metabolic Costs and Muscle Activity Patterns During Robotic- and Therapist-Assisted Treadmill Walking in Individuals With Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury , 2006, Physical Therapy.

[40]  Alessia Bramanti,et al.  Robotic gait rehabilitation and substitution devices in neurological disorders: where are we now? , 2016, Neurological Sciences.

[41]  C. Braun,et al.  Motor learning elicited by voluntary drive. , 2003, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[42]  E. van Lunteren,et al.  Improvement of diaphragm and limb muscle isotonic contractile performance by K+ channel blockade , 2010, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[43]  Kara K. Patterson,et al.  Gait asymmetry in community-ambulating stroke survivors. , 2008, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[44]  Lucas H V van der Woude,et al.  Differences in muscle activity and temporal step parameters between Lokomat guided walking and treadmill walking in post-stroke hemiparetic patients and healthy walkers , 2017, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[45]  A. Mayr,et al.  Prospective, Blinded, Randomized Crossover Study of Gait Rehabilitation in Stroke Patients Using the Lokomat Gait Orthosis , 2007, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[46]  F. Zajac,et al.  Gait differences between individuals with post-stroke hemiparesis and non-disabled controls at matched speeds. , 2005, Gait & posture.

[47]  J C Wall,et al.  Gait asymmetries in residual hemiplegia. , 1986, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[48]  Chitralakshmi K. Balasubramanian,et al.  Variability in spatiotemporal step characteristics and its relationship to walking performance post-stroke. , 2009, Gait & posture.

[49]  B. Dobkin Neurobiology of Rehabilitation , 2004, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[50]  Rob den Otter,et al.  The Combined Effects of Body Weight Support and Gait Speed on Gait Related Muscle Activity: A Comparison between Walking in the Lokomat Exoskeleton and Regular Treadmill Walking , 2014, PloS one.

[51]  A. Hof,et al.  Speed dependence of averaged EMG profiles in walking. , 2002, Gait & posture.

[52]  M. Folstein,et al.  Mini‐Mental State Examination , 2014 .

[53]  D. Lefeber,et al.  Human-Robot Interaction: Does Robotic Guidance Force Affect Gait-Related Brain Dynamics during Robot-Assisted Treadmill Walking? , 2015, PloS one.

[54]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing , 1995 .

[55]  B. Dobkin,et al.  Improved Gait Symmetry in Hemiparetic Stroke Patients Induced During Body Weight-Supported Treadmill Stepping , 1997 .

[56]  Rob den Otter,et al.  The combined effects of guidance force, bodyweight support and gait speed on muscle activity during able-bodied walking in the Lokomat. , 2016, Clinical biomechanics.

[57]  Hermanus J. Hermens,et al.  The recommendations for sensors and sensor placement procedures for surface electromyography , 1999 .