The GRAIDS Trial: a cluster randomised controlled trial of computer decision support for the management of familial cancer risk in primary care

The objective was to evaluate the effect of an assessment strategy using the computer decision support system (the GRAIDS software), on the management of familial cancer risk in British general practice in comparison with best current practice. The design included cluster randomised controlled trial, and involved forty-five general practice teams in East Anglia, UK. Randomised to GRAIDS (Genetic Risk Assessment on the Internet with Decision Support) support (intervention n=23) or comparison (n=22). Training in the new assessment strategy and access to the GRAIDS software (GRAIDS arm) was conducted, compared with an educational session and guidelines about managing familial breast and colorectal cancer risk (comparison) were mailed. Outcomes were measured at practice, practitioner and patient levels. The primary outcome measure, at practice level, was the proportion of referrals made to the Regional Genetics Clinic for familial breast or colorectal cancer that were consistent with referral guidelines. Other measures included practitioner confidence in managing familial cancer (GRAIDS arm only) and, in patients: cancer worry, risk perception and knowledge about familial cancer. There were more referrals to the Regional Genetics Clinic from GRAIDS than comparison practices (mean 6.2 and 3.2 referrals per 10 000 registered patients per year; mean difference 3.0 referrals; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.2–4.8; P=0.001); referrals from GRAIDS practices were more likely to be consistent with referral guidelines (odds ratio (OR)=5.2; 95% CI 1.7–15.8, P=0.006). Patients referred from GRAIDS practices had lower cancer worry scores at the point of referral (mean difference −1.44 95% CI −2.64 to −0.23, P=0.02). There were no differences in patient knowledge about familial cancer. The intervention increased GPs' confidence in managing familial cancer. Compared with education and mailed guidelines, assessment including computer decision support increased the number and quality of referrals to the Regional Genetics Clinic for familial cancer risk, improved practitioner confidence and had no adverse psychological effects in patients. Trials are registered under N0181144343 in the UK National Research Register.

[1]  M. P. Eiff,et al.  Primary care physicians' utilization and perceptions of genetics services , 1998, Genetics in Medicine.

[2]  G. Freeman,et al.  Evolving general practice consultation in Britain: issues of length and context , 2002, British medical journal.

[3]  J. Emery,et al.  Psychological Impact of Genetic Counseling for Familial Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis , 2005, Familial Cancer.

[4]  Joan Leach,et al.  Expert heads a'rolling Melissa Leach Ian , 2005, The Lancet.

[5]  Argyrios Ziogas,et al.  Validation of family history data in cancer family registries. , 2003, American journal of preventive medicine.

[6]  M. Gwinn.  Genomics and population health; United States 2003 , 2004 .

[7]  J Austoker,et al.  Computer support for interpreting family histories of breast and ovarian cancer in primary care: comparative study with simulated cases , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[8]  P. Sandercock,et al.  Framework for design and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[9]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of innovations , 1964, Encyclopedia of Sport Management.

[10]  Andrew S. Coulson,et al.  Computer support for recording and interpreting family histories of breast and ovarian cancer in primary care (RAGs): qualitative evaluation with simulated patients , 1999, BMJ.

[11]  R. Wooster,et al.  Breast and ovarian cancer. , 2003, The New England journal of medicine.

[12]  Joanna Adams,et al.  Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic surveillance in individuals with a family history of colorectal cancer: 16 year, prospective, follow-up study , 2005, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[13]  J. Emery,et al.  The GRAIDS Trial: The development and evaluation of computer decision support for cancer genetic risk assessment in primary care , 2005, Annals of human biology.

[14]  E. Balas,et al.  Improving clinical practice using clinical decision support systems: a systematic review of trials to identify features critical to success , 2005, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[15]  J. Emery,et al.  Common hereditary cancers and implications for primary care , 2001, The Lancet.

[16]  A. Grant,et al.  Improving the referral process for familial breast cancer genetic counselling: findings of three randomised controlled trials of two interventions. , 2005, Health technology assessment.

[17]  J. Austoker,et al.  Evaluation of the impact of two educational interventions on GP management of familial breast/ovarian cancer cases: a cluster randomised controlled trial. , 2001, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[18]  Sudhir Srivastava,et al.  Revised Bethesda Guidelines for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (Lynch syndrome) and microsatellite instability. , 2004, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[19]  Stephen Sutton,et al.  Internet-based risk assessment and decision support for the management of familial cancer in primary care: a survey of GPs' attitudes and intentions. , 2002, Family practice.

[20]  P. Devilee,et al.  Presymptomatic DNA testing and prophylactic surgery in families with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation , 2000, The Lancet.

[21]  J. Austoker,et al.  Education improves general practitioner (GP) management of familial breast/ovarian cancer: findings from a cluster randomised controlled trial , 2002, Journal of medical genetics.

[22]  Allan Donner,et al.  Design and Analysis of Cluster Randomization Trials in Health Research , 2001 .

[23]  J Raftery,et al.  Imatinib for the treatment of patients with unresectable and/or metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumours: systematic review and economic evaluation. , 2005, Health technology assessment.

[24]  Tom Fahey,et al.  Evaluation of computer based clinical decision support system and risk chart for management of hypertension in primary care: randomised controlled trial , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[25]  J Cuzick,et al.  Overview of the main outcomes in breast-cancer prevention trials , 2003, The Lancet.

[26]  Muin J Khoury,et al.  Research priorities for evaluating family history in the prevention of common chronic diseases. , 2003, American journal of preventive medicine.

[27]  A R Padhani,et al.  Screening with magnetic resonance imaging and mammography of a UK population at high familial risk of breast cancer: a prospective multicentre cohort study (MARIBS) , 2005, The Lancet.

[28]  F. Sullivan,et al.  A descriptive feast but an evaluative famine: systematic review of published articles on primary care computing during 1980-97 , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[29]  N Risch,et al.  Genetic analysis of breast cancer in the cancer and steroid hormone study. , 1991, American journal of human genetics.

[30]  M. Modell,et al.  Raising the profile of genetics in primary care , 2004, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[31]  Michael J. Watson,et al.  The impact of genetic counselling on risk perception and mental health in women with a family history of breast cancer , 1999, British Journal of Cancer.

[32]  J. Burn,et al.  A descriptive study of UK cancer genetics services: an emerging clinical response to the new genetics , 2001, British Journal of Cancer.