Network-Constrained Unit Commitment Based on Reserve Models Fully Considering the Stochastic Characteristics of Wind Power

The existing optimization approaches regarding network-constrained unit commitment with large wind power integration face great difficulties in reconciling the two crucial but contradictory objectives: computational efficiency and the economy of the solutions. This paper proposes a new network-constrained unit commitment approach, which aims to better achieve these two objectives, by introducing newly proposed reserve models and simplified network constraints. This approach constructs the reserve models based on a sufficiently large number of stochastic wind power scenarios to fully and accurately capture the stochastic characteristics of wind power. These reserve models are directly incorporated into the traditional unit commitment formulation to simultaneously optimize the on/off decision variables and system reserve levels, therefore, this approach can comprehensively evaluate the costs and benefits of the scheduled reserves and thus produce very economical schedule. Meanwhile, these reserve models bring in very little computational burden because they simply consist of a small number of continuous variables and linear constraints. Besides, this approach can evaluate the impact of network congestion on the schedule by just introducing a small number of network constraints that are closely related to network congestion, i.e., the simplified network constraints, and thus concurrently ensures its high computational efficiency. Numerical results show that the proposed approach can produce more economical schedule than stochastic approach and deterministic approach but has similar computational efficiency as the deterministic approach.

[1]  Q. Hernández-Escobedo,et al.  Wind energy resource in Northern Mexico , 2014 .

[2]  P. Sauer,et al.  Uncertainty Management in the Unit Commitment Problem , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[3]  Linquan Bai,et al.  Adjustable robust optimal power flow with the price of robustness for large-scale power systems , 2016 .

[4]  A. Conejo,et al.  Economic Valuation of Reserves in Power Systems With High Penetration of Wind Power , 2009 .

[5]  J F Restrepo,et al.  Assessing the Yearly Impact of Wind Power Through a New Hybrid Deterministic/Stochastic Unit Commitment , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[6]  Deepak Rajan,et al.  IBM Research Report Minimum Up/Down Polytopes of the Unit Commitment Problem with Start-Up Costs , 2005 .

[7]  Yi Sun,et al.  Challenges and Solutions for 10Gbps PON , 2008 .

[8]  Lei Wu A Tighter Piecewise Linear Approximation of Quadratic Cost Curves for Unit Commitment Problems , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[9]  Antonio J. Conejo,et al.  Decomposition Techniques in Mathematical Programming: Engineering and Science Applications , 2006 .

[10]  John R. Birge,et al.  An Improved Stochastic Unit Commitment Formulation to Accommodate Wind Uncertainty , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[11]  Yang Wang,et al.  Unit Commitment With Volatile Node Injections by Using Interval Optimization , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[12]  Xu Andy Sun,et al.  Adaptive Robust Optimization for the Security Constrained Unit Commitment Problem , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[13]  Daniel S. Kirschen,et al.  Robust allocation of reserves considering different reserve types and the flexibility from HVDC , 2017 .

[14]  Sangmin Lee,et al.  A Computational Framework for Uncertainty Quantification and Stochastic Optimization in Unit Commitment With Wind Power Generation , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[15]  Jae-Kun Lyu,et al.  Cost Analysis Method for Estimating Dynamic Reserve Considering Uncertainties in Supply and Demand , 2016 .

[16]  H. Madsen,et al.  From probabilistic forecasts to statistical scenarios of short-term wind power production , 2009 .

[17]  Francisco D. Galiana,et al.  Generalized Sigma approach to unit commitment with uncertain wind power generation , 2015 .

[18]  M. Shahidehpour,et al.  Stochastic Security-Constrained Unit Commitment , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[19]  Anthony Papavasiliou,et al.  Multiarea Stochastic Unit Commitment for High Wind Penetration in a Transmission Constrained Network , 2013, Oper. Res..

[20]  M. Milligan,et al.  Integrating Variable Renewable Energy: Challenges and Solutions , 2013 .

[21]  Daniel S. Kirschen,et al.  Estimating the Spinning Reserve Requirements in Systems With Significant Wind Power Generation Penetration , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[22]  Yi Ding,et al.  Impact of Wind Power Scenario Reduction Techniques on Stochastic Unit Commitment , 2016, 2016 Second International Symposium on Stochastic Models in Reliability Engineering, Life Science and Operations Management (SMRLO).

[23]  Christoph Weber,et al.  Impacts of Dynamic Probabilistic Reserve Sizing Techniques on Reserve Requirements and System Costs , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy.

[24]  Jianhui Wang,et al.  Stochastic Optimization for Unit Commitment—A Review , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[25]  Anastasios G. Bakirtzis,et al.  Stochastic and Deterministic Unit Commitment Considering Uncertainty and Variability Reserves for High Renewable Integration , 2017 .

[26]  Jose Restrepo,et al.  Security-Constrained Unit Commitment With Uncertain Wind Generation: The Loadability Set Approach , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[27]  Meysam Doostizadeh,et al.  Energy and Reserve Scheduling Under Wind Power Uncertainty: An Adjustable Interval Approach , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[28]  Panos M. Pardalos,et al.  A decomposition approach to the two-stage stochastic unit commitment problem , 2012, Annals of Operations Research.

[29]  Quetzalcoatl Hernandez-Escobedo,et al.  Is the wind a periodical phenomenon? The case of Mexico , 2011 .

[30]  Zhe Zhang,et al.  Economic Valuation of Low-Load Operation with Auxiliary Firing of Coal-Fired Units , 2017 .