Performance consequences of psychological empowerment

The relationship between psychological empowerment and job performance, and whether three intermediate performance determinants; motivation, ability, and opportunity to perform hold the key to unlocking the empowerment-performance relationship dilemma are addressed. Using hierarchical linear modeling to analyze responses from 380 project management-level staff, the results show that psychological empowerment not only has direct and positive performance consequences, but also indirect effects, mediated by intrinsic motivation, opportunity to perform and ability to perform. The findings provide preliminary evidence in support of a comprehensive model of work performance that takes into consideration not only motivation and ability but opportunity to perform. Indeed, opportunity to perform actually emerged as a stronger mediator in the psychological empowerment-contextual performance behaviors relationship than ability to perform. The findings of both direct and indirect relationships however demonstrate that the relationship between empowerment and performance is more complex than previously thought. Yet, by demonstrating that empowered employees exhibit positive performance behaviors, psychological empowerment clearly emerges as a valuable path for organizations to pursue in their search for performance improvement in project settings.

[1]  Michael Livingston,et al.  Multilevel Analysis for Applied Research—It's Just Regression! , 2009 .

[2]  Zoe S. Dimitriades,et al.  Individual, Job, Organizational and Contextual Correlates of Employment Empowerment: Some Greek Evidence , 2004 .

[3]  Michael Y. Mak,et al.  Problematic issues associated with project partnering — the contractor perspective , 2002 .

[4]  Kevin Au,et al.  Empowerment effects across cultures , 2004 .

[5]  John P. Robinson,et al.  Measures Of Personality And Social Psychological Attitudes , 1991 .

[6]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences , 1979 .

[7]  Ramon J. Aldag,et al.  The Intrinsic-Extrinsic Dichotomy: Toward Conceptual Clarity , 1977 .

[8]  K. Thomas,et al.  Cognitive Elements of Empowerment: An “Interpretive” Model of Intrinsic Task Motivation , 1990 .

[9]  J. Breaugh.  Important considerations in using statistical procedures to control for nuisance variables in non-experimental studies , 2008 .

[10]  Martin Loosemore,et al.  Responsibility, power and construction conflict , 1999 .

[11]  Stephen W. Nason,et al.  A Dimensional Analysis of the Relationship between Psychological Empowerment and Effectiveness Satisfaction, and Strain , 1997 .

[12]  Eddie W.L. Cheng,et al.  Job Performance Dimensions for Improving Final Project Outcomes , 2007 .

[13]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[14]  Steve Rowlinson,et al.  Empowerment in project teams: a multilevel examination of the job performance implications , 2009 .

[15]  L. J. Williams,et al.  Job Satisfaction and Organizational Commitment as Predictors of Organizational Citizenship and In-Role Behaviors , 1991 .

[16]  S. Parker,et al.  Work Design and Individual Work Performance: Research Findings and an Agenda for Future Inquiry , 2005 .

[17]  Paul D. Bliese,et al.  Being Both Too Liberal and Too Conservative: The Perils of Treating Grouped Data as though They Were Independent , 2004 .

[18]  Edward L. Deci,et al.  Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior , 1975, Perspectives in Social Psychology.

[19]  Xianggui Qu,et al.  Multivariate Data Analysis , 2007, Technometrics.

[20]  G. Spreitzer.  An empirical test of a comprehensive model of intrapersonal empowerment in the workplace , 1995, American journal of community psychology.

[21]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Do Substitutes for Leadership Really Substitute for Leadership? An Empirical Examination of Kerr and Jermier's Situational Leadership Model , 1993 .

[22]  R. Rumberger.  Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods: and. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1992. (ISBN 0-8039-4627-9), pp. xvi + 265. Price: U.S. $45.00 (cloth) , 1997 .

[23]  James R. Van Scotter,et al.  Interpersonal facilitation and job dedication as separate facets of contextual performance. , 1996 .

[24]  Andrew R.J. Dainty,et al.  Redefining performance measures for construction project managers: an empirical evaluation , 2003 .

[25]  Richard Whitfield,et al.  Implementation of empowerment in Chinese high power-distance organizations , 2008 .

[26]  Richard,et al.  Motivation through the Design of Work: Test of a Theory. , 1976 .

[27]  S. Seibert.  TAKING EMPOWERMENT TO THE NEXT LEVEL : A MULTIPLE-LEVEL MODEL OF EMPOWERMENT , PERFORMANCE , AND SATISFACTION , 2004 .

[28]  Rolph E. Anderson,et al.  Multivariate data analysis (4th ed.): with readings , 1995 .

[29]  Anthony S. Bryk,et al.  Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods , 1992 .

[30]  S. West,et al.  A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. , 2002, Psychological methods.

[31]  V. Vroom.  Work and motivation , 1964 .

[32]  Samuel Aryee,et al.  Leader-member exchange in a Chinese context: Antecedents, the mediating role of psychological empowerment and outcomes , 2006 .

[33]  Therese. Joiner,et al.  Decision making delegation: implications for Chinese managers' performance and satisfaction , 2007 .

[34]  W. Borman,et al.  Expanding the Criterion Domain to Include Elements of Contextual Performance , 1993 .

[35]  S. Rowlinson,et al.  Towards a conceptual framework of empowerment and job performance in project teams , 2007 .

[36]  Jagdip Singh,et al.  Vlerick Leuven Gent Working Paper Series 2003/29 PSYCHOLOGICAL EMPOWERMENT IN THE WORKPLACE: REVIEWING THE EMPOWERMENT EFFECTS ON CRITICAL WORK OUTCOMES , 2003 .

[37]  Robert S. Barcikowski,et al.  Statistical Power with Group Mean as the Unit of Analysis , 1981 .

[38]  T. Wall,et al.  Empowerment, Performance, and Operational Uncertainty: A Theoretical Integration , 2002 .

[39]  A. Bandura.  Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory , 1985 .

[40]  D. Marlowe,et al.  A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. , 1960, Journal of consulting psychology.

[41]  Mark L. Mitchell,et al.  Research Design Explained , 1987 .

[42]  Graham Winch,et al.  Re-engineering construction: the role of research and implementation , 2003 .

[43]  Duncan Cramer,et al.  A Cautionary Tale of Two Statistics: Partial Correlation and Standardized Partial Regression , 2003, The Journal of psychology.

[44]  Aarti Sood,et al.  Empowerment effects across cultures , 2007 .

[45]  D. Hofmann.  An Overview of the Logic and Rationale of Hierarchical Linear Models , 1997 .

[46]  Douglas J. Sego,et al.  FACTORS AFFECTING THE OPPORTUNITY TO PERFORM TRAINED TASKS ON THE JOB , 2006 .

[47]  Anthony Walker,et al.  Project Management in Construction , 1984 .

[48]  B. Thompson,et al.  Use of Structure Coefficients in Published Multiple Regression Articles: β is not Enough , 2001 .

[49]  Anita M. M. Liu,et al.  A power‐based leadership approach to project management , 2006 .

[50]  S. Thompson.  Social Learning Theory , 2008 .

[51]  K. Murphy.  Personnel Selection in Organizations , 1992 .

[52]  A. Field.  Discovering statistics using SPSS : (and sex, drugs and rock'n' roll) , 2005 .

[53]  G. Spreitzer.  PSYCHOLOGICAL EMPOWERMENT IN THE WORKPLACE: DIMENSIONS, MEASUREMENT, AND VALIDATION , 1995 .

[54]  R. N. Kanungo,et al.  The Empowerment Process: Integrating Theory and Practice , 1988 .

[55]  Marilyn E. Gist,et al.  Self-Efficacy: A Theoretical Analysis of Its Determinants and Malleability , 1992 .

[56]  Paul E. Spector,et al.  Development of four self-report measures of job stressors and strain: Interpersonal Conflict at Work Scale, Organizational Constraints Scale, Quantitative Workload Inventory, and Physical Symptoms Inventory. , 1998, Journal of occupational health psychology.

[57]  Steve Rowlinson,et al.  Empowering project teams: toward an integrative conceptualization of empowerment , 2007 .

[58]  M. Sobel.  Asymptotic Confidence Intervals for Indirect Effects in Structural Equation Models , 1982 .

[59]  James W. Bishop,et al.  AN EXAMINATION OF THE RELATIONSHIP OF EMPLOYEE INVOLVEMENT WITH JOB SATISFACTION, EMPLOYEE COOPERATION, AND INTENTION TO QUIT IN U.S. INVESTED ENTERPRISE IN CHINA , 2003 .

[60]  Kevin Au,et al.  Exploring empowerment cross-cultural differences along the power distance dimension , 1999 .

[61]  Andrew R.J. Dainty,et al.  Empowerment within the UK construction sector , 2002 .

[62]  Kathleen C. Gerbasi,et al.  Short, homogeneous versions of the Marlow‐Crowne Social Desirability Scale , 1972 .

[63]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  Consequences of violating the independence assumption in analysis of variance. , 1986 .

[64]  William N. Cooke.  Employee Participation Programs, Group-Based Incentives, and Company Performance: A Union-Nonunion Comparison , 1994 .

[65]  S. Sonnentag,et al.  Psychological management of individual performance. , 2005 .

[66]  M. Tuuli,et al.  Empowerment and control dynamics in project teams: a multilevel examination of the antecedents and jobperformance consequences , 2009 .

[67]  Andrew R.J. Dainty,et al.  Project affinity: the role of emotional attachment in construction projects , 2005 .

[68]  Aaron M. Anvuur.  Cooperation in construction projects: concept, antecedents and strategies , 2008 .

[69]  J. Gill.  Hierarchical Linear Models , 2005 .

[70]  P. Bliese.  Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. , 2000 .

[71]  Melvin Blumberg,et al.  The Missing Opportunity in Organizational Research: Some Implications for a Theory of Work Performance , 1982 .

[72]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  A general procedure for the estimation of interdependence. , 1996, Psychological bulletin.

[73]  M. Frese,et al.  Performance Concepts and Performance Theory , 2005 .

[74]  J. Scott Armstrong,et al.  Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. , 1977 .

[75]  Raymond T. Sparrowe,et al.  An examination of the mediating role of psychological empowerment on the relations between the job, interpersonal relationships, and work outcomes. , 2000, The Journal of applied psychology.

[76]  J. Weisz,et al.  Changing the world and changing the self: A two-process model of perceived control. , 1982 .

[77]  L. H. Peters,et al.  Situational Constraints and Work Outcomes: The Influences Of a Frequently Overlooked Construct , 1980 .

[78]  David. Proverbs,et al.  Towards developing competency-based measures for construction project managers: Should contextual behaviours be distinguished from task behaviours? , 2008 .

[79]  Terry S. Overton,et al.  Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys , 1977 .

[80]  Mary Anne Devanna.  Men and Women of the Corporation , 1978 .

[81]  A. Dainty,et al.  The construction labour market skills crisis: the perspective of small–medium‐sized firms , 2005 .

[82]  David J. Edwards,et al.  The UK building education recruitment crisis: a call for action , 2003 .

[83]  Bradley L. Kirkman,et al.  A multilevel study of leadership, empowerment, and performance in teams. , 2007, The Journal of applied psychology.

[84]  Richard Fellows,et al.  Enhancing commitment through work empowerment , 2007 .