An alternative way to uncover drivers of coffee liking: Preference mapping based on consumers’ preference ranking and open comments

In classic consumer science, liking has generally been measured with the 9-point hedonic scale. In recent years, signal detection procedures where consumers rank products in terms of preference have been used, together with an R-index that measures the distance in preference. Ranking has been found to be friendlier for consumers, being a more “natural” exercise than scaling. However, scaling has the advantage of quantifying liking, resulting in data sets that can be treated further, for example through preference mapping, together with sensory data from a trained panel or from consumers. Preference mapping is very useful for product development and as a communication tool. This study compared two preference mapping approaches, one using a data set from hedonic scaling plus intensity questions and the other using preference ranking data coupled with open comments. Preference ranking tests plus open comments by consumers proved a very promising method as it produced very similar internal preference map results to “traditional” preference mapping from liking scales. This quicker and easier method in terms of practical implementation has the added advantage of eliciting drivers of liking and disliking directly from consumers, as these cannot be obtained through attribute intensity assessment or by using a trained panel.

[1]  Tormod Næs,et al.  Statistics for Sensory and Consumer Science , 2010 .

[2]  John Brown,et al.  RECOGNITION ASSESSED BY RATING AND RANKING , 1974 .

[3]  Jacques Viaene,et al.  Sensory segments in preference for plain chocolate across Belgium and Poland , 2001 .

[4]  H. Moskowitz THOUGHTS ON SUBJECTIVE MEASUREMENT, SENSORY METRICS AND USEFULNESS OF OUTCOMES , 2005 .

[5]  H. Macfie 23 – Preference mapping and food product development , 2007 .

[6]  Sara R. Jaeger,et al.  Consumer preferences for fresh and aged apples: a cross-cultural comparison , 1998 .

[7]  Pieternel A. Luning,et al.  Internal versus external preference analysis : an exploratory study on end-user evaluation , 2006 .

[8]  Alistair Paterson,et al.  Gender preference in hedonic ratings for espresso and espresso-milk coffees. , 2000 .

[9]  Gastón Ares,et al.  PREFERENCE MAPPING OF TEXTURE OF DULCE DE LECHE , 2006 .

[10]  Gastón Ares,et al.  Sensory profiling, the blurred line between sensory and consumer science. A review of novel methods for product characterization , 2012 .

[11]  Sara R. Jaeger,et al.  Comparison of five common acceptance and preference methods , 2008 .

[12]  Gastón Ares,et al.  EXTERNAL PREFERENCE MAPPING OF COMMERCIAL ANTIAGING CREAMS BASED ON CONSUMERS' RESPONSES TO A CHECK‐ALL‐THAT‐APPLY QUESTION , 2011 .

[13]  Ronan Symoneaux,et al.  Comment analysis of consumer’s likes and dislikes as an alternative tool to preference mapping. A case study on apples , 2012 .

[14]  Luis Guerrero,et al.  A cross-national consumer segmentation based on food benefits: The link with consumption situations and food perceptions , 2012 .

[15]  M. Drake,et al.  Preference Mapping of Commercial Chocolate Milks , 2006 .

[16]  Michael O'Mahony,et al.  UNDERSTANDING DISCRIMINATION TESTS: A USER-FRIENDLY TREATMENT OF RESPONSE BIAS, RATING AND RANKING R-INDEX TESTS AND THEIR RELATIONSHIP TO SIGNAL DETECTION , 1992 .

[17]  Howard R. Moskowitz,et al.  VARIABILITY IN HEDONICS: INDICATIONS OF WORLD‐WIDE SENSORY AND COGNITIVE PREFERENCE SEGMENTATION , 2000 .

[18]  Gregory R Ziegler,et al.  Rejection Thresholds in Chocolate Milk: Evidence for Segmentation. , 2012, Food quality and preference.

[19]  Eric K. Clemons,et al.  How Information Changes Consumer Behavior and How Consumer Behavior Determines Corporate Strategy , 2008, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[20]  Morten Meilgaard,et al.  Sensory Evaluation Techniques , 2020 .

[21]  C. Scaman,et al.  Evaluation of R-indices for preference testing of apple juices , 1997 .

[22]  Jérôme Pagès,et al.  L'analyse factorielle multiple , 1984 .

[23]  Gastón Ares,et al.  Use of an open-ended question to identify drivers of liking of milk desserts. Comparison with preference mapping techniques , 2010 .

[24]  Michael O'Mahony,et al.  At What Temperatures Do Consumers Like to Drink Coffee?: Mixing Methods , 2002 .

[25]  Hye-Seong Lee,et al.  Quantification of sensory and food quality: the R-index analysis. , 2009, Journal of food science.

[26]  Kwang-Ok Kim,et al.  A new approach to category scales of intensity. I: Traditional versus rank-rating , 1998 .

[27]  C. Forde,et al.  AN INVESTIGATION USING THREE APPROACHES TO UNDERSTAND THE INFLUENCE OF EXTRINSIC PRODUCT CUES ON CONSUMER BEHAVIOR: AN EXAMPLE OF AUSTRALIAN WINES , 2011 .

[28]  Gastón Ares,et al.  Identifying ideal products using three different consumer profiling methodologies. Comparison with external preference mapping , 2011 .

[29]  Pieter A. D. Musters,et al.  Text analysis of open-ended survey responses : a complementary method to preference mapping , 2003 .

[30]  Harry T. Lawless,et al.  Sensory Evaluation of Food: Principles and Practices , 1998 .