Abstraction and the (Misnamed) Language Familiarity Effect

Talkers are recognized more accurately if they are speaking the listeners' native language rather than an unfamiliar language. This "language familiarity effect" has been shown not to depend upon comprehension and must instead involve language sound patterns. We further examine the level of sound-pattern processing involved, by comparing talker recognition in foreign languages versus two varieties of English, by (a) English speakers of one variety, (b) English speakers of the other variety, and (c) non-native listeners (more familiar with one of the varieties). All listener groups performed better with native than foreign speech, but no effect of language variety appeared: Native listeners discriminated talkers equally well in each, with the native variety never outdoing the other variety, and non-native listeners discriminated talkers equally poorly in each, irrespective of the variety's familiarity. The results suggest that this talker recognition effect rests not on simple familiarity, but on an abstract level of phonological processing.

[1]  James M. McQueen,et al.  Phonetic content influences voice discriminability , 2007 .

[2]  M. J. van der Haagen.  Caught between norms: the English pronunciation of Dutch learners , 1998 .

[3]  S. Fillenbaum,et al.  Evaluational reactions to spoken languages. , 1960, Journal of abnormal and social psychology.

[4]  D. Rendall,et al.  Learning to differentiate individuals by their voices: Infants' individuation of native- and foreign-species voices. , 2014, Developmental psychobiology.

[5]  Jennifer M. Fellowes,et al.  Talker identification based on phonetic information. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[6]  Rachel M. Theodore,et al.  Characteristics of listener sensitivity to talker-specific phonetic detail. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  David H. Deterding,et al.  The measurement of rhythm: a comparison of Singapore and British English , 2001, J. Phonetics.

[8]  'Mere guesswork': Cross-lingual voice comparisons and the jury , 2011 .

[9]  Anne Cutler,et al.  Inter-dependent Categorization of Voices and Segments , 2011, ICPhS.

[10]  Sarah C. Creel,et al.  Differences in talker recognition by preschoolers and adults. , 2012, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[11]  Alvin G. Goldstein,et al.  Recognition memory for accented and unaccented voices , 1981 .

[12]  Johanna Helena Kerstholt,et al.  Earwitnesses: effects of accent, retention and telephone , 2006 .

[13]  Fernando Cuetos,et al.  Ability for voice recognition is a marker for dyslexia in children. , 2014, Experimental psychology.

[14]  Tyler K. Perrachione,et al.  Asymmetric cultural effects on perceptual expertise underlie an own-race bias for voices , 2010, Cognition.

[15]  Sarah C. Creel,et al.  Gradient language dominance affects talker learning , 2014, Cognition.

[16]  Niels O. Schiller,et al.  Different influences of the native language of a listener on speaker recognition , 1997 .

[17]  Bruno L. Giordano,et al.  A language-familiarity effect for speaker discrimination without comprehension , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[18]  C. Thompson.  A language effect in voice identification , 1987 .

[19]  Joanne L. Miller,et al.  Listener sensitivity to individual talker differences in voice-onset-time. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  John D E Gabrieli,et al.  Human Voice Recognition Depends on Language Ability , 2011, Science.

[21]  A. Yarmey.  EARWITNESS SPEAKER IDENTIFICATION , 1995 .

[22]  Anne Cutler,et al.  Vowel perception: Effects of non-native language vs. non-native dialect , 2005, Speech Commun..

[23]  Sarah C. Creel,et al.  How Talker Identity Relates to Language Processing , 2011, Lang. Linguistics Compass.

[24]  The “other-accent” effect in voice recognition , 2012 .

[25]  Elizabeth K. Johnson,et al.  Infant ability to tell voices apart rests on language experience. , 2011, Developmental science.

[26]  F. McGehee.  The Reliability of the Identification of the Human Voice , 1937 .

[27]  J. McQueen,et al.  Foreign Subtitles Help but Native-Language Subtitles Harm Foreign Speech Perception , 2009, PloS one.

[28]  V. Mann,et al.  Development of voice recognition: parallels with face recognition. , 1979, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[29]  J. McQueen,et al.  The specificity of perceptual learning in speech processing , 2005, Perception & psychophysics.

[30]  David B Pisoni,et al.  Identification and discrimination of bilingual talkers across languages. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[31]  R. Schwartz,et al.  The development of language-specific and language-independent talker processing. , 2013, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[32]  G Strube,et al.  The role of language familiarity in voice identification , 1991, Memory & cognition.

[33]  Tyler K. Perrachione,et al.  Differential neural contributions to native- and foreign-language talker identification. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[34]  Jennifer M. Fellowes,et al.  Learning to recognize talkers from natural, sinewave, and reversed speech samples. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.