The effectiveness of Atraumatic Restorative Treatment ( ART ) compared to conventional treatment in restoring class II dental cavities in permanent molar and premolar teeth : a systematic review [ protocol ] Protocol information Authors

[1]  A. Menezes,et al.  Obesity and dental caries: systematic review. , 2013, Revista de saude publica.

[2]  A. Banerjee,et al.  Atraumatic restorative treatment versus amalgam restoration longevity: a systematic review , 2010, Clinical Oral Investigations.

[3]  D. Nash.  Pediatric oral health therapists are important to address the access to care problem for children. , 2009, Pediatric Dentistry.

[4]  Arthur Musakulu Kemoli,et al.  Influence of the cavity-size on the survival rate of proximal ART restorations in primary molars. , 2009, International journal of paediatric dentistry.

[5]  G. Yassen.  One-year survival of occlusal ART restorations in primary molars placed with and without cavity conditioner. , 2009, Journal of dentistry for children.

[6]  M. V. van’t Hof,et al.  Survival of self-etch adhesive Class II composite restorations using ART and conventional cavity preparations in primary molars. , 2006, American journal of dentistry.

[7]  A. Sheiham.  Dental caries affects body weight, growth and quality of life in pre-school children , 2006, British Dental Journal.

[8]  N. Ersin,et al.  A clinical evaluation of resin-based composite and glass ionomer cement restorations placed in primary teeth using the ART approach: results at 24 months. , 2006, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[9]  C. Vargas,et al.  Experience and policy implications of children presenting with dental emergencies to US pediatric dentistry training programs. , 2006, Pediatric dentistry.

[10]  A. Rosenblatt,et al.  Clinical evaluation of atraumatic restorations in primary molars: a comparison between 2 glass ionomer cements. , 2006, Journal of dentistry for children.

[11]  D. Locker,et al.  Malnourishment in a population of young children with severe early childhood caries. , 2006, Pediatric dentistry.

[12]  Susan O Griffin,et al.  Surveillance for dental caries, dental sealants, tooth retention, edentulism, and enamel fluorosis--United States, 1988-1994 and 1999-2002. , 2005, Morbidity and mortality weekly report. Surveillance summaries.

[13]  M. Siegal,et al.  Oral health status and access to dental care for ohio head start children. , 2004, Pediatric dentistry.

[14]  J. Frencken,et al.  ART: a minimal intervention approach to manage dental caries. , 2004, Dental update.

[15]  M. A. van 't Hof,et al.  Effectiveness of Single-surface ART Restorations in the Permanent Dentition: A Meta-analysis , 2004 .

[16]  S. Mickenautsch,et al.  Comparative cost of ART and conventional treatment within a dental school clinic. , 2002, SADJ : journal of the South African Dental Association = tydskrif van die Suid-Afrikaanse Tandheelkundige Vereniging.

[17]  E. Lo,et al.  Provision of Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART) restorations to Chinese pre-school children--a 30-month evaluation. , 2001, International journal of paediatric dentistry.

[18]  A. Sheiham,et al.  Health policy: Inequalities in oral health: a review of the evidence and recommendations for action , 1999, British Dental Journal.

[19]  J. Frencken,et al.  How effective is ART in the management of dental caries? , 1998, Community dentistry and oral epidemiology.

[20]  J. Frencken,et al.  Atraumatic restorative treatment (ART): a three-year community field trial in Thailand--survival of one-surface restorations in the permanent dentition. , 1996, Journal of public health dentistry.

[21]  J. Frencken,et al.  Atraumatic restorative treatment (ART): rationale, technique, and development. , 1996, Journal of public health dentistry.