Theoretical Examination of the Effects of Anxiety and Electronic Performance Monitoring on Behavioural Biometric Security Systems

Abstract Computerised biometric systems are automated methods of verifying or recognising the identity of a user on the basis of some physiological characteristic, like a fingerprint or some aspects of behaviour such as keystroke patterns. Behaviourally based biometric systems include signature, speaker and keystroke verification. The investigation of psychological factors which might impact on the efficiency of a behavioural biometric computer security monitoring system has to our knowledge not been conducted. Of particular concern in the present paper are the potential effects of state anxiety on individual's physiological and performance responses. It is suggested that in a behaviourally based biometric computer security monitoring system, state anxiety may have sufficient effects to alter typical physiological and performance responses, resulting in an increased risk of security challenges, interruption of work-flow and resultant poor performance. It is also proposed that behaviourally based biometric systems may have the potential to be used as electronic performance monitoring systems, and typical responses to such systems need to be examined when developing and implementing any behaviourally based biometric security system.

[1]  Ralph R. Behnke,et al.  A cognitive‐physiological model of speech anxiety , 1981 .

[2]  G. Torkzadeh,et al.  The concept and correlates of computer anxiety , 1992 .

[3]  Robin Kay,et al.  Predicting Student Teacher Commitment to the Use of Computers , 1990 .

[4]  Jacobson Sf,et al.  Computer anxiety among nursing students, educators, staff, and administrators. , 1989 .

[5]  H. Eysenck Behavior Therapy Techniques , 1968 .

[6]  P Carayon,et al.  Employee stress and health complaints in jobs with and without electronic performance monitoring. , 1992, Applied ergonomics.

[7]  M J Smith,et al.  Stress, computer-based work monitoring and measurement systems: a conceptual overview. , 1992, Applied ergonomics.

[8]  I. Sarason Anxiety, self-preoccupation and attention , 1988 .

[9]  M. Eysenck Anxiety: The Cognitive Perspective , 1992 .

[10]  John J. Leggett,et al.  Verifying Identity via Keystroke Characteristics , 1988, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[11]  B. Miller,et al.  Vital signs of identity [biometrics] , 1994, IEEE Spectrum.

[12]  V. Hamilton,et al.  A cognitive model of anxiety: implications for theories of personality and motivation. , 1985, Issues in mental health nursing.

[13]  Doug Mahar,et al.  Employee Acceptance of Biometric Security Systems , 1994 .

[14]  Pascale Carayon,et al.  Effect of Electronic Performance Monitoring on Job Design and Worker Stress: Review of the Literature and Conceptual Model , 1993 .

[15]  Robin L. Sherman Biometrics futures , 1992, Comput. Secur..

[16]  B A Wilson Computer anxiety in nursing students. , 1991, The Journal of nursing education.

[17]  Larry D. Rosen,et al.  Myths and realities of computerphobia: A meta-analysis , 1990 .

[18]  Ron Henderson,et al.  Occupational differences in computer-related anxiety: implications for the implementation of a computerized patient management information system , 1995, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[19]  Charles D. Spielberger,et al.  Chapter 14 – CONCEPTUAL AND METHODOLOGICAL ISSUES IN ANXIETY RESEARCH , 1972 .

[20]  Michael R. Simonson,et al.  Development of a Standardized Test of Computer Literacy and a Computer Anxiety Index , 1987 .

[21]  I. Sarason,et al.  Test anxiety and the passage of time. , 1978, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[22]  M. Eysenck,et al.  Anxiety and Performance: The Processing Efficiency Theory , 1992 .

[23]  James C. McElroy,et al.  Computer Anxiety and Computer-Based Training: A Laboratory Experiment , 1990 .

[24]  M. Humphreys,et al.  Personality, motivation, and performance: a theory of the relationship between individual differences and information processing. , 1984, Psychological review.

[25]  R. Heinssen,et al.  Assessing computer anxiety: Development and validation of the Computer Anxiety Rating Scale , 1987 .

[26]  Charles D. Spielberger,et al.  Anxiety: Current Trends in Theory and Research , 1972 .

[27]  Irwin G. Sarason,et al.  Anxiety, cognitive interference, and performance. , 1990 .

[28]  Robert D. Smith,et al.  Computer anxiety in management: myth or reality? , 1986, CACM.

[29]  M. Craske,et al.  Musical performance anxiety: the three-systems model and self-efficacy theory. , 1984, Behaviour research and therapy.

[30]  R. Neiss Reconceptualizing arousal: psychobiological states in motor performance. , 1988, Psychological bulletin.

[31]  D DiTecco,et al.  Operator stress and monitoring practices. , 1992, Applied ergonomics.

[32]  D. Mahar,et al.  Construct validity of computer anxiety as measured by the Computer Attitudes Scale , 1995 .

[33]  A J Rush,et al.  A cognitive model of anxiety formation and anxiety resolution. , 1985, Issues in mental health nursing.

[34]  L. H. Shaffer,et al.  Timing in the Motor Programming of Typing , 1978 .

[35]  J Lund,et al.  Electronic performance monitoring: A review of research issues. , 1992, Applied ergonomics.

[36]  Meni Koslowsky,et al.  Predicting behavior on a computer from intentions, attitudes, and experience , 1990 .

[37]  Irwin G. Sarason,et al.  Test anxiety : theory, research, and applications , 1980 .

[38]  A Reynolds,et al.  Computer literacy: a mission for continuing education for professional nurses. , 1989, Journal of continuing education in nursing.

[39]  Michael J. Smith Mental and physical strain at VDT workstations , 1987 .

[40]  Joseph Sharit,et al.  Stress reactions to computer-interactive tasks as a function of task structure and individual differences , 1993, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..