Evaluating an e-nose ability to detect biogas plant efficiency: a case study

Abstract The demand for online monitoring and control of biogas process is increasing, since better monitoring and control system can improve process plants stability and economy. A number of parameters in both the liquid and the gas phase have been suggested as process indicators (pH, alkalinity, VFA and H2, redox potential, biogas production rate, biogas composition, FOS/TAC ratio, COD and/or VS reduction). The present study proposes the use of complex sensors as a possible solution to engineer a consistent control system. Tests were performed to analyze the biogas coming from a biogas plant in which conditions of pre-overloading and overloading were artificially inducted. The different inducted functioning conditions were recognised using a FOS/TAC tester, or the ratio volatile organic acids/alkaline buffer capacity. The FOS/TAC ratio has long been recognized extending as far as the imminent inversion of the digester biology to be detected at an early stage. Data coming from the e-nose were sorted and classified according to FOS/TAC ratio as a reference method. Not all the sensors of the e-nose were reactive to manure digestates, but four of them, sensitive to aromatic compounds, ammonia alkanes and methane, resulted crucial in the samples identification. Results confirmed that the e-nose can discriminate different digestion conditions, demonstrating the possibility to reduce the number of sensors in this innovative tool for biogas control systems. However, this instrument cannot be considered a complete alternative to traditional analysis systems, as, for example, the FOS/TAC titration, but a supporting tool for a quick analysis of the system.

[1]  Anne-Claude Romain,et al.  Evaluation of an electronic nose for the early detection of organic overload of anaerobic digesters , 2012, Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering.

[2]  Å. Nordberg,et al.  On-line NIR monitoring during anaerobic treatment of municipal solid waste. , 2003, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[3]  Roberto Todeschini,et al.  Introduzione alla chemiometria , 1998 .

[4]  J. Steyer,et al.  State indicators for monitoring the anaerobic digestion process. , 2010, Water research.

[5]  Irini Angelidaki,et al.  An innovative online VFA monitoring system for the anerobic process, based on headspace gas chromatography , 2007, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[6]  K. Esbensen,et al.  On‐line near infrared monitoring of glycerol‐boosted anaerobic digestion processes: Evaluation of process analytical technologies , 2008, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[7]  B. Ahring,et al.  Volatile fatty acids as indicators of process imbalance in anaerobic digestors , 1995, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[8]  U. Lossie,et al.  Targeted control of biogas plants with the help of FOS/TAC , 2009 .

[9]  Klaus Fischer,et al.  Near-infrared-reflection spectroscopy as measuring method to determine the state of the process for automatic control of anaerobic digestion. , 2013 .

[10]  H. Troy Nagle,et al.  Handbook of Machine Olfaction: Electronic Nose Technology , 2003 .

[11]  Peter Schulze Lammers,et al.  Odor Pollution in the Environment and the Detection Instrumentation , 2004 .

[12]  K. Esbensen,et al.  Transflexive Embedded near Infrared Monitoring for Key Process Intermediates in Anaerobic Digestion/Biogas Production , 2007 .

[13]  Hideki Harada,et al.  Rapid and accurate determination of VFAs and ethanol in the effluent of an anaerobic H(2)-producing bioreactor using near-infrared spectroscopy. , 2009, Water research.

[14]  Anne-Claude Romain,et al.  Potential of the Electronic Nose as a Tool for the Detection of Disturbances in Anaerobic Digestion Processes , 2010 .

[15]  Alastair J Ward,et al.  Optimisation of the anaerobic digestion of agricultural resources. , 2008, Bioresource technology.

[16]  J. Holm‐Nielsen,et al.  The future of anaerobic digestion and biogas utilization. , 2009, Bioresource technology.

[17]  Carl-Fredrik Mandenius,et al.  Assessment of the Performance of a Fed‐Batch Cultivation from the Preculture Quality Using an Electronic Nose , 2002, Biotechnology progress.

[18]  Anne-Claude Romain,et al.  Chemometrics methods for the identification and the monitoring of an odour in the environement with an electronic nose , 2001 .

[19]  Kim H. Esbensen,et al.  Monitoring of anaerobic digestion processes: A review perspective , 2011 .

[20]  A Nordberg,et al.  Monitoring of a biogas process using electronic gas sensors and near-infrared spectroscopy (NIR). , 2000, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[21]  P. Weiland Biogas production: current state and perspectives , 2009, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[22]  B. Ahring,et al.  Regulation and optimization of the biogas process: Propionate as a key parameter , 2007 .