The Earthquake Readiness Scale: The Development of a Valid and Reliable Unifactorial Measure

Preparedness is a key dependent variable in many studies examining people’s response to disasters such as earthquakes. A feature of many studies on this issue, however, is the lack of attention given to psychometric issues when constructing measures of preparedness. With regard to earthquake preparation, for example, many studies could be greatly improved by the use of a valid and reliable measure of preparedness. This research developed such a measure that assessed both low-level preparedness, such as having an emergency kit, and high-level preparedness, such as altering home structures to mitigate damage. Studies of Wellington (New Zealand) residents using two samples totalling n=652 showed that 23 items measuring these different aspects of earthquake preparation could be combined into a reliable, valid, unifactorial scale. This brief scale should have utility in multivariate studies of earthquake preparation, either as a dependent variable, where preparation is the outcome variable of primary interest, or as one of several independent variables, where preparation and other measures predict another outcome variable.

[1]  John-Paul Mulilis,et al.  The effects of a large destructive local earthquake on earthquake preparedness as assessed by an earthquake preparedness scale , 1990 .

[2]  P. S. Showalter Prognostication of Doom: An Earthquake Prediction's Effect on Four Small Communities , 1993 .

[3]  John E. Farley Public, Media, and Institutional Responses to the Iben Browning Earthquake Prediction , 1993 .

[4]  C Eadie,et al.  LIVING IN EARTHQUAKE COUNTRY , 2005 .

[5]  James Lewis,et al.  Natural Hazards - Local, National and Global , 1976 .

[6]  Paul Simpson-Housley,et al.  Factors in Perception of Earthquake Hazard , 1987, Perceptual and motor skills.

[7]  J. M. Cortina,et al.  What Is Coefficient Alpha? An Examination of Theory and Applications , 1993 .

[8]  Joanne M. Nigg,et al.  Waiting for Disaster: Earthquake Watch in California , 1986 .

[9]  John-Paul Mulilis,et al.  Tornado Preparedness of Students, Nonstudent Renters, and Nonstudent Owners: Issues of PrE Theory1 , 2000 .

[10]  Linda B. Bourque,et al.  Preparedness and Hazard Mitigation Actions before and after Two Earthquakes , 1995 .

[11]  John Hattie,et al.  Methodology Review: Assessing Unidimensionality of Tests and ltenls , 1985 .

[12]  M. L. Edwards,et al.  Social Location and Self-Protective Behavior: Implications for Earthquake Preparedness , 1993, International Journal of Mass Emergencies & Disasters.

[13]  David Dooley,et al.  Earthquake Preparedness: Predictors in a Community Survey1 , 1992 .

[14]  E. L. Jackson,et al.  Response to Earthquake Hazard , 1981 .

[15]  John McClure,et al.  When Earthquake Damage is Seen as Preventable: Attributions, Locus of Control and Attitudes to Risk , 1999 .

[16]  D. Mileti,et al.  The Causal Sequence of Risk Communication in the Parkfield Earthquake Prediction Experiment , 1992 .

[17]  N. Schmitt Uses and abuses of coefficient alpha. , 1996 .

[18]  Joanne M. Nigg,et al.  Mobility and Perceptions of a Hazardous Environment , 1982 .

[19]  M. Lindell,et al.  Household Adjustment to Earthquake Hazard , 2000 .

[20]  Keith F. Widaman,et al.  Unidimensional Versus Domain Representative Parceling of Questionnaire Items: An Empirical Example , 1994 .

[21]  Alexander J. Rothman,et al.  Preoccupation and affect as predictors of protective action following natural disaster , 2000 .

[22]  Paul W. O’Brien,et al.  Warnings during disaster: normalizing communicated risk , 1992 .

[23]  Dennis S. Mileti,et al.  The Role of Searching in Shaping Reactions to Earthquake Risk Information , 1997 .

[24]  Tomoichi Ishizuka,et al.  Causal analysis of earthquake concern and preparing behavior in the North Izu Peninsula , 1983 .

[25]  Dennis S. Mileti,et al.  The Great Earthquake Experiment: Risk Communication And Public Action , 1993 .

[26]  R. Lippa,et al.  Behavioral Change in Earthquake Preparedness Due to Negative Threat Appeals: A Test of Protection Motivation Theory , 1990 .