Age group differences in performance using distinct input modalities: A target acquisition performance evaluation

The traditional attitude towards user interfaces has changed. The Post-WIMP era has brought about novel input modalities such as touch, tangibles or gestures that allow users to manipulate digital contents more intuitively. These novel input modalities make use of the users' innate skills instead of imposing the learning of new interaction techniques. Nonetheless, there has not been a systematic evaluation on how, or if, these interfaces influence the users' performance and/or preference: distinct interfaces may be more or less appropriate regarding different age groups, user profiles, contexts or type of tasks. This work is a preliminary evaluation on whether the users' efficiency is indeed influenced by different input modalities or age. We conducted a target acquisition performance evaluation with 60 subjects to understand how different input modalities influence the speed and accuracy of three specific age groups (children, young adults and older-adults) when dealing with a continuous selection task. Three input modalities were considered to perform the task (mouse, touch and gestures) and the methodology was based on Fitts' law, a target acquisition performance evaluation model. Overall, when comparing movement times amongst the three groups, there are significant differences between age groups regarding the index of performance. We believe our findings may show that indeed the type of input modality used and the user's age could affect one's performance.

[1]  Jon Froehlich,et al.  Age-related differences in performance with touchscreens compared to traditional mouse input , 2013, CHI.

[2]  James D. Foley,et al.  The human factors of computer graphics interaction techniques , 1984, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[3]  H. Beyer Tukey, John W.: Exploratory Data Analysis. Addison‐Wesley Publishing Company Reading, Mass. — Menlo Park, Cal., London, Amsterdam, Don Mills, Ontario, Sydney 1977, XVI, 688 S. , 1981 .

[4]  I.,et al.  Fitts' Law as a Research and Design Tool in Human-Computer Interaction , 1992, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[5]  Qiang Huang,et al.  Age-related differences in pointing movements in restricted visual tasks and their design implication , 2013, 2013 ICME International Conference on Complex Medical Engineering.

[6]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. , 1964 .

[7]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions , 1963 .

[8]  Daniel Vogel,et al.  Shift: a technique for operating pen-based interfaces using touch , 2007, CHI.

[9]  Andries van Dam,et al.  Post-WIMP user interfaces , 1997, CACM.

[10]  D. Hoaglin,et al.  Fine-Tuning Some Resistant Rules for Outlier Labeling , 1987 .

[11]  I. Scott MacKenzie,et al.  Accuracy measures for evaluating computer pointing devices , 2001, CHI.

[12]  Sharon L. Oviatt,et al.  Perceptual user interfaces: multimodal interfaces that process what comes naturally , 2000, CACM.

[13]  R. Mayer,et al.  Nine Ways to Reduce Cognitive Load in Multimedia Learning , 2003 .

[14]  P. Fitts The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. , 1954, Journal of experimental psychology.

[15]  Constantine Stephanidis,et al.  User Interfaces for All: New Perspectives into Human- Computer Interaction , 2001 .

[16]  I. Scott MacKenzie,et al.  Towards a standard for pointing device evaluation, perspectives on 27 years of Fitts' law research in HCI , 2004, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[17]  Shumin Zhai,et al.  Performance evaluation of input devices in trajectory-based tasks: an application of the steering law , 1999, CHI '99.

[18]  Manfred Tscheligi,et al.  Tablet, gestures, remote control?: influence of age on performance and user experience with iTV applications , 2014, TVX.

[19]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Noncommand user interfaces , 1993, CACM.

[20]  D. C. M. Carvalho,et al.  Interaction Paradigms Versus Age-Related User Profiles: an Evaluation on Content Selection , 2015, IEEE Latin America Transactions.

[21]  Daniel J. Wigdor,et al.  Designing user interfaces for multi-touch and gesture devices , 2009, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[22]  Shumin Zhai,et al.  Speed-accuracy tradeoff in Fitts' law tasks-on the equivalency of actual and nominal pointing precision , 2004, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[23]  Rajeev Sharma,et al.  Experimental evaluation of vision and speech based multimodal interfaces , 2001, PUI '01.