Systematic prioritisation of SDGs: Machine learning approach
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Anita Breuer,et al. Translating Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) Interdependencies into Policy Advice , 2019, Sustainability.
[2] J Elith,et al. A working guide to boosted regression trees. , 2008, The Journal of animal ecology.
[3] John W. McArthur,et al. Change of Pace: Accelerations and Advances During the Millennium Development Goal Era , 2017 .
[4] Leo Breiman,et al. Classification and Regression Trees , 1984 .
[5] Jerome H Friedman,et al. Multiple additive regression trees with application in epidemiology , 2003, Statistics in medicine.
[6] W. Cheung,et al. A rapid assessment of co-benefits and trade-offs among Sustainable Development Goals , 2017, Marine Policy.
[7] D. Griggs,et al. Policy: Map the interactions between Sustainable Development Goals , 2016, Nature.
[8] M. Nilsson,et al. A Nexus Approach to the Post-2015 Agenda: Formulating Integrated Water, Energy, and Food SDGs , 2014 .
[9] William Stafford Noble,et al. A cross-validation scheme for machine learning algorithms in shotgun proteomics , 2012, BMC Bioinformatics.
[10] D. Blanc,et al. Exploring Links Between Education and Sustainable Development Goals Through the Lens of UN Flagship Reports , 2016 .
[11] Graciela Metternicht,et al. Prioritising SDG targets: assessing baselines, gaps and interlinkages , 2018, Sustainability Science.
[12] R. Jandl,et al. The Nexus between the Austrian Forestry Sector and the Sustainable Development Goals: A Review of the Interlinkages , 2019, Forests.
[13] Paul Howe. The triple nexus: A potential approach to supporting the achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals? , 2019 .
[14] Leo Breiman,et al. Statistical Modeling: The Two Cultures (with comments and a rejoinder by the author) , 2001 .
[15] Graciela Metternicht,et al. Indicator-based assessments of progress towards the sustainable development goals (SDGs): a case study from the Arab region , 2017, Sustainability Science.
[16] Henrik Carlsen,et al. Towards systemic and contextual priority setting for implementing the 2030 Agenda , 2017, Sustainability Science.
[17] Leo Breiman,et al. Statistical Modeling: The Two Cultures (with comments and a rejoinder by the author) , 2001, Statistical Science.
[18] D. Lusseau,et al. Income-based variation in Sustainable Development Goal interaction networks , 2019, Nature Sustainability.
[19] David L. Dollar,et al. Growth is Good for the Poor , 2001 .
[20] D. Rybski,et al. A Systematic Study of Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) Interactions , 2017 .
[21] Yong-Ping Zhao,et al. Fast cross validation for regularized extreme learning machine , 2014 .
[22] Mario Biggeri,et al. Tracking the SDGs in an ‘integrated’ manner: A proposal for a new index to capture synergies and trade-offs between and within goals , 2019, World Development.
[23] Matteo Pedercini,et al. Policy coherence to achieve the SDGs: using integrated simulation models to assess effective policies , 2017, Sustainability Science.
[24] Jong Hae Kim. Multicollinearity and misleading statistical results , 2019, Korean journal of anesthesiology.
[25] N. Nakicenovic,et al. Six Transformations to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals , 2019, Nature Sustainability.
[26] James M Radner,et al. Expanding the evidence base to drive more productive early childhood investment , 2017, The Lancet.
[27] Davide La Torre,et al. Multi-criteria model for sustainable development using goal programming applied to the United Arab Emirates , 2015 .
[28] E. Barbier,et al. Sustainable development goal indicators: Analyzing trade-offs and complementarities , 2019, World Development.
[29] Youngjae Lee,et al. Government spending and sustainable economic growth: based on first- and second-level COFOG data , 2020, Public Money & Management.
[30] Classifying Sustainable Development Goal trajectories: A country-level methodology for identifying which issues and people are getting left behind , 2019, World development.