Transportation investment project selection using fuzzy multiobjective programming

Abstract This paper proposes the fuzzy multiobjective programming for the problem of transportation investment project selection (TIPS). The programming then uses the fuzzy spatial algorithm, which calculates the performance of objective achievement and the requirement of resource utilization as of fuzziness. Under a complex and uncertain decision-making environment, there exists a certain degree of interdependence among these transportation investment projects. This paper uses expert evaluation, and conducts, respectively, with the consensus of most of the experts, the decision on interdependency type (complementary and substitutive) and on the degree of fuzzy interdependence. In every iteration of the fuzzy spatial algorithm, the method of ranking fuzzy numbers must be used so as to obtain the ranking for selecting investment projects. This paper has modified the method provided by Kim and Park in order that the preference of most of the decision makers or experts can be overlooked, since the degree of optimism or pessimism can be demonstrated in the profitability of every investment project. In the end, this paper will employ a numerical example to illustrate the method forwarded.

[1]  Hans-Jürgen Zimmermann,et al.  Planning models for research and development , 1990 .

[2]  G. Bortolan,et al.  A review of some methods for ranking fuzzy subsets , 1985 .

[3]  J. Baldwin,et al.  Comparison of fuzzy sets on the same decision space , 1979 .

[4]  J. Siskos A way to deal with fuzzy preferences in multi-criteria decision problems , 1982 .

[5]  E. Stanley Lee,et al.  Comparing fuzzy numbers: The proportion of the optimum method , 1990, Int. J. Approx. Reason..

[6]  L. M. D. C. Ibáñez,et al.  A subjective approach for ranking fuzzy numbers , 1989 .

[7]  Michael L. Donnell,et al.  Fuzzy Decision Analysis , 1979, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[8]  Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng,et al.  A MULTIOBJECTIVE PROGRAMMING APPROACH FOR SELECTING NON-INDEPENDENT TRANSPORTATION INVESTMENT ALTERNATIVES , 1996 .

[9]  Bernard Roy,et al.  A programming method for determining which Paris metro stations should be renovated , 1986 .

[10]  Anthony N. S. Freeling Fuzzy Sets and Decision Analysis , 1980, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[11]  K. Kim,et al.  Ranking fuzzy numbers with index of optimism , 1990 .

[12]  Cerry M. Klein,et al.  New algorithm for the ranking procedure in fuzzy decision-making , 1989, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[13]  C. Carlsson Tackling an MCDM-problem with the help of some results from fuzzy set theory , 1982 .

[14]  H. Zimmermann Fuzzy programming and linear programming with several objective functions , 1978 .

[15]  S. Ovchinnikov,et al.  On ranking fuzzy sets , 1987 .

[16]  S. M. Baas,et al.  Rating and ranking of multiple-aspect alternatives using fuzzy sets , 1976, at - Automatisierungstechnik.

[17]  Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng,et al.  TRANSPORTATION INVESTMENT PROJECT SELECTION WITH FUZZY MULTIOBJECTIVES , 1993 .

[18]  Shan-Huo Chen Ranking fuzzy numbers with maximizing set and minimizing set , 1985 .

[19]  Madan M. Gupta,et al.  Fuzzy mathematical models in engineering and management science , 1988 .

[20]  J. Adamo Fuzzy decision trees , 1980 .

[21]  Howard Raiffa,et al.  Games And Decisions , 1958 .

[22]  Bernard Roy,et al.  Ranking of suburban line extension projects on the Paris metro system by a multicriteria method , 1982 .

[23]  O. P. Dias,et al.  The R & D project selection problem with fuzzy coefficients , 1988 .

[24]  Hans-Jürgen Zimmermann,et al.  Media Selection and Fuzzy Linear Programming , 1978 .

[25]  D. Dubois,et al.  Operations on fuzzy numbers , 1978 .

[26]  H. Zimmermann Fuzzy sets, decision making, and expert systems , 1987 .

[27]  Ronald R. Yager,et al.  A procedure for ordering fuzzy subsets of the unit interval , 1981, Inf. Sci..