OPAL: An open-source software tool for integrating biodiversity and ecosystem services into impact assessment and mitigation decisions

Abstract Governments and financial institutions increasingly require that environmental impact assessment and mitigation account for consequences to both biodiversity and ecosystem services. Here we present a new software tool, OPAL (Offset Portfolio Analyzer and Locator), which maps and quantifies the impacts of development on habitat and ecosystem services, and facilitates the selection of mitigation activities to offset losses. We demonstrate its application with an oil and gas extraction facility in Colombia. OPAL is the first tool to provide direct consideration of the distribution of ecosystem service benefits among people in a mitigation context. Previous biodiversity-focused efforts led to redistribution or loss of ecosystem services with environmental justice implications. Joint consideration of biodiversity and ecosystem services enables targeting of offsets to benefit both nature and society. OPAL reduces the time and technical expertise required for these analyses and has the flexibility to be used across a range of geographic and policy contexts.

[1]  Luis Enrique Sánchez,et al.  Is the ecosystem service concept improving impact assessment? Evidence from recent international practice , 2015 .

[2]  James E. Salzman,et al.  The Effects of Wetland Mitigation Banking on People , 2006 .

[3]  Alexander J. Henshaw,et al.  Polyscape: A GIS mapping framework providing efficient and spatially explicit landscape-scale valuation of multiple ecosystem services , 2013 .

[4]  Juan Sebastian Lozano,et al.  "Servicesheds" Enable Mitigation of Development Impacts on , 2012 .

[5]  James S. Kagan,et al.  Best Practices for Integrating Ecosystem Services into Federal Decision Making , 2015 .

[6]  D. Geneletti Assessing the impact of alternative land-use zoning policies on future ecosystem services , 2013 .

[7]  J. Kiesecker,et al.  Policy Development for Environmental Licensing and Biodiversity Offsets in Latin America , 2014, PloS one.

[8]  Ideam Estudio nacional del agua 2014 , 2010 .

[9]  Heather Tallis,et al.  Who loses? Tracking ecosystem service redistribution from road development and mitigation in the Peruvian Amazon , 2015 .

[10]  H. Pereira,et al.  Biodiversity offsets: from current challenges to harmonized metrics , 2015 .

[11]  Fabien Quétier,et al.  Assessing ecological equivalence in biodiversity offset schemes: Key issues and solutions , 2011 .

[12]  Yihe Lü,et al.  Cooling effects of wetlands in an urban region: The case of Beijing , 2012 .

[13]  R. Chaplin-Kramer,et al.  A new approach to modeling the sediment retention service (InVEST 3.0): Case study of the Cape Fear catchment, North Carolina, USA. , 2015, The Science of the total environment.

[14]  M. Conte,et al.  Ecosystem services reinforce Sumatran tiger conservation in land use plans , 2014 .

[15]  Martina Zeleňáková,et al.  Environmental Impact Assessment—State of the Art , 2017 .

[16]  Andrew Jarvis,et al.  Hole-filled SRTM for the globe Version 4 , 2008 .

[17]  M. Doyle,et al.  Stacking ecosystem services , 2014 .

[18]  H. Rainey,et al.  A review of corporate goals of No Net Loss and Net Positive Impact on biodiversity , 2014, Oryx.

[19]  Davide Geneletti,et al.  Reasons and options for integrating ecosystem services in strategic environmental assessment of spatial planning , 2011 .

[20]  William R. Sheate,et al.  Ecosystem services in environmental assessment — Help or hindrance? , 2013 .

[21]  Darius J. Semmens,et al.  Comparing approaches to spatially explicit ecosystem service modeling: A case study from the San Pedro River, Arizona , 2013 .

[22]  T. BenDor,et al.  Estimating the Size and Impact of the Ecological Restoration Economy , 2015, PloS one.

[23]  Joshua Goldstein,et al.  Mitigation for one & all: An integrated framework for mitigation of development impacts on biodiversity and ecosystem services , 2015 .

[24]  Susanne Frank,et al.  Cross-Sectoral Resource Management: How Forest Management Alternatives Affect the Provision of Biomass and Other Ecosystem Services , 2015 .