The effect of external representation on constructing computer models of complex phenomena

Computer modeling – creating executable modelsof science domains – has been recognized as animportant teaching method. Still not much isknown about the factors making modelingenvironments effective in use. We investigatethe effect of different externalrepresentations on the construction of computermodels. Representations can significantlyinfluence the processes of modeling. In orderto find the specific benefits of two differentrepresentations, we compare dyads working on acollaborative modeling task using a text-basedmodel representation, in which correctequations are required to make the model run,with others using a graphical representation,in which the model is built by qualitativelylinking variables. The learners, secondaryschool students and modeling novices, workedwith the representations on a task in thedomain of physics. Results indicate that thetwo representations induce differentbehaviours, which are appropriate for differentphases of the modeling process.

[1]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  Problem Solving and Reasoning. , 1984 .

[2]  K. Robson,et al.  Teaching and Learning with the Dynamical Modelling System. , 1985 .

[3]  D. Hestenes.  Toward a modeling theory of physics instruction , 1987 .

[4]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  Why a Diagram is (Sometimes) Worth Ten Thousand Words , 1987 .

[5]  Ellen B. Mandinach.  The Cognitive Effects of Simulation-Modeling Software and Systems Thinking on Learning and Achievement. , 1988 .

[6]  David Riley,et al.  Learning about systems by making models , 1990 .

[7]  Marlo Steed,et al.  Stella, a simulation construction kit: cognitive process and educational implications , 1992 .

[8]  H. Schecker.  Learning physics by making models , 1993 .

[9]  Jon Ogborn,et al.  Sixth form students' ability to engage in computational modelling , 1994 .

[10]  Joseph Krajcik,et al.  Making Dynamic Modeling Accessible to Precollege Science Students , 1994, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[11]  Helen M. Doerr.  An Integrated Approach to Mathematical Modeling: A Classroom Study , 1995 .

[12]  M. Wild.  Mental models and computer modelling , 1996 .

[13]  Jiajie Zhang,et al.  The Nature of External Representations in Problem Solving , 1997, Cogn. Sci..

[14]  Christoph Schierz,et al.  The Effect of the Interface on Learning Style in a Simulation-Based Learning Situation , 1997, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[15]  Jon Ogborn,et al.  Cognitive development and qualitative modelling , 1998, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[16]  S. Payne,et al.  The Effects of Operator Implementation Cost on Planfulness of Problem Solving and Learning , 1998, Cognitive Psychology.

[17]  Daniel D. Suthers,et al.  Effects of alternate representations of evidential relations on collaborative learning discourse , 1999, CSCL.

[18]  Jan F. Broenink,et al.  20-SIM software for hierarchical bond-graph/block-diagram models , 1999, Simul. Pract. Theory.

[19]  Shaaron Ainsworth,et al.  The functions of multiple representations , 1999, Comput. Educ..

[20]  Stephen M. Alessi,et al.  Designing Educational Support in System-Dynamics-Based Interactive Learning Environments , 2000 .

[21]  John B. Black,et al.  The Development of Cognitive Skills To Support Inquiry Learning , 2000 .

[22]  J. V. Linden,et al.  Leren in dialoog : een discussie over samenwerkend leren in onderwijs en opleiding , 2000 .

[23]  J. Michael Spector,et al.  System Dynamics and Interactive Learning Environments: Lessons Learned and Implications for the Future , 2000 .

[24]  Kathleen Hogan,et al.  Cognitive Comparisons of Students' Systems Modeling in Ecology , 2001 .

[25]  Kenneth D. Forbus,et al.  A qualitative modeling environment for middle-school students: A progress report , 2001 .