Classify Participants in Online Communities

As online communities become increasingly popular, researchers have tried to examine participating activities in online communities as well as how to sustain online communities. However, relatively few studies have tried to understand what kinds of participants constitute online communities. In this study, we try to contribute online community research by developing "common language" to classify different participants in online communities. Specifically, we argue that the previous way to classify participants is not sufficient and accurate, and we propose a continuum to classify participants based on participants' overall trend of posting activities. In order to further online community research, we also propose potential directions for future studies.

[1]  Aniket Kittur,et al.  He says, she says: conflict and coordination in Wikipedia , 2007, CHI.

[2]  Lee Sproull,et al.  Reducing social context cues: electronic mail in organizational communication , 1986 .

[3]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Learning in Online Forums , 2003 .

[4]  Vanessa Paz Dennen,et al.  Pedagogical lurking: Student engagement in non-posting discussion behavior , 2008, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[5]  Atreyi Kankanhalli,et al.  Special Issue on: Knowledge Management in Asia Understanding Seeking from Electronic Knowledge Repositories: , 2022 .

[6]  Rajiv Sabherwal,et al.  Usability and Sociability in Online Communities: A Comparative Study of Knowledge Seeking and Contribution , 2009, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[7]  Samer Faraj,et al.  Why Should I Share? Examining Social Capital and Knowledge Contribution in Electronic Networks of Practice , 2005, MIS Q..

[8]  Ojelanki K. Ngwenyama,et al.  Communication Richness in Electronic Mail: Critical Social Theory and the Contextuality of Meaning , 1997, MIS Q..

[9]  FarajSamer,et al.  Why should i share? examining social capital and knowledge contribution in electronic networks of practice , 2005 .

[10]  Masakazu Fujimoto,et al.  The active lurker: influence of an in-house online community on its outside environment[1] (abstract only) , 2003, SIGG.

[11]  Ann Majchrzak,et al.  Corporate wiki users: results of a survey , 2006, WikiSym '06.

[12]  S. Kiesler,et al.  Community Effort in Online Groups: Who Does the Work and Why? , 2007 .

[13]  Atreyi Kankanhalli,et al.  Contributing Knowledge to Electronic Knowledge Repositories: An Empirical Investigation , 2005, MIS Q..

[14]  Tim Smithers,et al.  Research issues , 1994, Formal Design Methods for CAD.

[15]  Mani R. Subramani,et al.  A framework of knowledge management systems: issues and challenges for theory and practice , 2000, ICIS.

[16]  Herbert H. Clark,et al.  Grounding in communication , 1991, Perspectives on socially shared cognition.

[17]  S LeeAllen,et al.  Communication richness in electronic mail , 1997 .

[18]  Masakazu Fujimoto,et al.  The active lurker: influence of an in-house online community on its outside environment , 2003, GROUP.

[19]  Fion S. L. Lee,et al.  Virtual community informatics: what we know and what we need to know , 2002, Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[20]  Andrew B. Whinston,et al.  Research Issues in Social computing , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[21]  Conan C. Albrecht,et al.  Motivating Content Contributions to Online Communities: Toward a More Comprehensive Theory , 2005, Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[22]  John Short,et al.  The social psychology of telecommunications , 1976 .

[23]  Colin Egan,et al.  Providing Fine-Grained Feedback within an On-Line Learning System--Identifying the Workers from the Lurkers and the Shirkers. , 2006 .

[24]  Dick Stenmark,et al.  Designing Competence Systems - Towards Interest-Actvated Technology , 2002, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..

[25]  B. Seely,et al.  Organizational Learning and Communities-of-Practice , 1991 .

[26]  Jennifer Preece,et al.  The top five reasons for lurking: improving community experiences for everyone , 2004, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[27]  Brian S. Butler,et al.  Membership Size, Communication Activity, and Sustainability: A Resource-Based Model of Online Social Structures , 2001, Inf. Syst. Res..

[28]  Jenny Preece,et al.  History and emergence of online communities , 2003 .

[29]  Christian Wagner,et al.  Wiki: A Technology for Conversational Knowledge Management and Group Collaboration , 2004, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[30]  Pattie Maes,et al.  Social information filtering: algorithms for automating “word of mouth” , 1995, CHI '95.

[31]  Mazleena Salleh,et al.  Knowledge Sharing in Workplace: Motivators and Demotivators , 2011 .

[32]  David Gross-Amblard,et al.  COMMUNITY DETECTION IN THE COLLABORATIVE WEB , 2010 .

[33]  C. Wagner,et al.  Supporting knowledge management in organizations with conversational technologies: Discussion forums, weblogs, and wikis , 2005 .

[34]  Stefan Hrastinski,et al.  What is online learner participation? A literature review , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[35]  Martin Wattenberg,et al.  Proceedings of the 40th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences- 2007 Talk Before You Type: Coordination in Wikipedia , 2022 .