Validation of an improved method to calculate the orientation and magnitude of pedicle screw bending moments.

Previous methods of pedicle screw strain measurement have utilized complex, time consuming methods of strain gauge application, experience high failure rates, do not effectively measure resultant bending moments, and cannot predict moment orientation. The purpose of this biomechanical study was to validate an improved method of quantifying pedicle screw bending moment orientation and magnitude. Pedicle screws were instrumented to measure biplanar screw bending moments by positioning four strain gauges on flat, machined surfaces below the screw head. Screws were calibrated to measure bending moments by hanging certified weights a known distance from the strain gauges. Loads were applied in 30 deg increments at 12 different angles while recording data from two independent strain channels. The data were then analyzed to calculate the predicted orientation and magnitude of the resultant bending moment. Finally, flexibility tests were performed on a cadaveric motion segment implanted with the instrumented screws to demonstrate the implementation of this technique. The difference between the applied and calculated orientation of the bending moments averaged (±standard error of the mean (SEM)) 0.3 ± 0.1 deg across the four screws for all rotations and loading conditions. The calculated resultant bending moments deviated from the actual magnitudes by an average of 0.00 ± 0.00 Nm for all loading conditions. During cadaveric testing, the bending moment orientations were medial/lateral in flexion-extension, variable in lateral bending, and diagonal in axial torsion. The technique developed in this study provides an accurate method of calculating the orientation and magnitude of screw bending moments and can be utilized with any pedicle screw fixation system.

[1]  R. Gilad,et al.  Uncorrected sagittal plane imbalance predisposes to symptomatic instrumentation failure. , 2008, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[2]  L. Lenke,et al.  Thoracolumbar Deformity Arthrodesis to L5 in Adults: The Fate of the L5-S1 Disc , 2003, Spine.

[3]  Tait S. Smith,et al.  S1 Screw Bending Moment With Posterior Spinal Instrumentation Across the Lumbosacral Junction After Unilateral Iliac Crest Harvest , 2001, Spine.

[4]  Tait S. Smith,et al.  Characteristics of pedicle screw loading. Effect of surgical technique on intravertebral and intrapedicular bending moments. , 1999, Spine.

[5]  L. Lenke,et al.  Long Adult Deformity Fusions to L5 and the Sacrum A Matched Cohort Analysis , 2004, Spine.

[6]  L. Lenke,et al.  Etiology and Revision Surgical Strategiesin Failed Lumbosacral Fixation of AdultSpinal Deformity Constructs , 2011, Spine.

[7]  L. Lenke,et al.  Comparison of Pelvic Fixation Techniques in Neuromuscular Spinal Deformity Correction: Galveston Rod Versus Iliac and Lumbosacral Screws , 2006, Spine.

[8]  Michael D. Kasten,et al.  Long-term Results of Iliac Wing Fixation Below Extensive Fusions in Ambulatory Adult Patients With Spinal Disorders , 2010, Journal of spinal disorders & techniques.

[9]  K. Bridwell,et al.  Biomechanical Comparison of Iliac Screws Versus Interbody Femoral Ring Allograft on Lumbosacral Kinematics and Sacral Screw Strain , 2010, Spine.

[10]  K. Bridwell Utilization of Iliac Screws and Structural Interbody Grafting for Revision Spondylolisthesis Surgery , 2005, Spine.

[11]  Michael H Schwartz,et al.  The in vivo three-dimensional motion of the human lumbar spine during gait. , 2008, Gait & posture.

[12]  R. C. Duffield,et al.  Internal Forces and Moments in Transpedicular Spine Instrumentation The Effect of Pedicle Screw Angle and Transfixation— The 4R‐4Bar Linkage Concept , 1990, Spine.

[13]  S. Yerby,et al.  A device for the measurement of pedicle screw moments by means of internal strain gauges. , 1996, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[14]  O. Boachie-Adjei,et al.  Biomechanical Analysis of Sacral Screw Strain and Range of Motion in Long Posterior Spinal Fixation Constructs: Effects of Lumbosacral Fixation Strategies in Reducing Sacral Screw Strains , 2012, Spine.

[15]  D. Bradford,et al.  Sacral screw loads in lumbosacral fixation for spinal deformity. , 1993, Spine.

[16]  T. Wright,et al.  Use of instrumented pedicle screws to evaluate load sharing in posterior dynamic stabilization systems. , 2008, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[17]  James D. Schwender,et al.  Complications in Long Fusions to the Sacrum for Adult Scoliosis: Minimum Five-Year Analysis of Fifty Patients , 2008, Spine.