Propagation of water pollution uncertainty and risk from the subsurface to the surface water system of a catchment

This paper investigates the propagation of quantifiable probability and quantification uncertainty of water pollution from local pollutant sources at and below the land surface, through the groundwater system, to downstream surface water recipients. Methodologically, the study shows how the risk and uncertainty of surface water pollution within a catchment may be assessed by a combined methodology of a Lagrangian stochastic advective-reactive modelling approach, which accounts for the quantifiable pollutant transport randomness, and a scenario analysis approach, which accounts for different quantification uncertainties. The results show that, in general, unambiguous risk assessment requires at least a reliable order-of-magnitude quantification of the prevailing relation between the average rate of physical pollutant transport from source to recipient and the average rate of pollutant attenuation. If this average relation can be reliably estimated to fall within two identified, relatively wide open value ranges, the assessment of pollution risk to surface waters from localised sources at or below the soil surface may be unambiguous even under otherwise large quantification uncertainty. For a relatively narrow, closed value range of this average rate relation, however, risk assessment must either rely on conservative assumptions, or else be based on a more detailed and resource demanding quantification of pollutant transport.

[1]  Carl I. Steefel,et al.  Multidimensional, multicomponent, subsurface reactive transport in nonuniform velocity fields: code verification using an advective reactive streamtube approach , 1998 .

[2]  Gedeon Dagan,et al.  A solute flux approach to transport in heterogeneous formations: 2. Uncertainty analysis , 1992 .

[3]  Georgia Destouni,et al.  Stochastic analysis of transport in unsaturated heterogeneous soils uder transient flow regimes , 2000 .

[4]  Other Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of The Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a Framework for Community Action in the Field of Water Policy (Water Framework Directive) , 2000 .

[5]  Georgia Destouni,et al.  Nitrogen loss rates in streams: Scale‐dependence and up‐scaling methodology , 2004 .

[6]  G. Destouni,et al.  The influence of observation method on local concentration statistics in the subsurface , 1997 .

[7]  G. Destouni,et al.  Solute transport through a heterogeneous coupled vadose‐saturated zone system with temporally random rainfall , 2001 .

[8]  Bill Batchelor,et al.  Stochastic Risk Assessment of Sites Contaminated by Hazardous Wastes , 1998 .

[9]  Georgia Destouni,et al.  Solute transport through the integrated groundwater‐stream system of a catchment , 2004 .

[10]  G. Dagan,et al.  A first‐order analysis of solute flux statistics in aquifers: The combined effect of pore‐scale dispersion, sampling, and linear sorption kinetics , 2002 .

[11]  G. Destouni Prediction uncertainty in solute flux through heterogeneous soil , 1992 .

[12]  Keith Beven,et al.  A manifesto for the equifinality thesis , 2006 .

[13]  G. Destouni,et al.  Solute Transport Through an Integrated Heterogeneous Soil‐Groundwater System , 1995 .

[14]  Sjoerd E. A. T. M. van der Zee,et al.  Stochastic analysis of nonlinear biodegradation in regimes controlled by both chromatographic and dispersive mixing , 2006 .

[15]  G. Dagan,et al.  The influence of pore‐scale dispersion on concentration statistical moments in transport through heterogeneous aquifers , 1997 .

[16]  Vladimir Cvetkovic,et al.  Field scale mass arrival of sorptive solute into the groundwater , 1991 .

[17]  Georgia Destouni,et al.  Uncertainty-accounting environmental policy and management of water systems. , 2007, Environmental science & technology.

[18]  Jeremy E. Oakley,et al.  Probability is perfect, but we can't elicit it perfectly , 2004, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[19]  G. Destouni,et al.  Water and solute residence times in a catchment: Stochastic‐mechanistic model interpretation of 18O transport , 1999 .

[20]  D. K. Smith,et al.  On the evaluation of groundwater contamination from underground nuclear tests , 2002 .

[21]  G. Destouni,et al.  Spatial distribution of unmonitored inland water discharges to the sea , 2007 .

[22]  G. Dagan Flow and transport in porous formations , 1989 .

[23]  Y. Rubin Applied Stochastic Hydrogeology , 2003 .

[24]  Gedeon Dagan,et al.  Transport of kinetically sorbing solute by steady random velocity in heterogeneous porous formations , 1994, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[25]  A. Rinaldo,et al.  On the Lagrangian formulations of reactive solute transport in the hydrologic response , 2005 .

[26]  V. Cvetkovic,et al.  Evaluation of Risk from Contaminants Migrating by Groundwater , 1996 .

[27]  Cost effective policies for alternative distributions of stochastic water pollution. , 2002, Journal of environmental management.

[28]  Timothy R. Ginn,et al.  Stochastic‐Convective Transport with Nonlinear Reaction: Mathematical Framework , 1995 .

[29]  G. Destouni,et al.  Risk‐Cost Analysis in Ground Water Contaminant Transport: The Role of Random Spatial Variability and Sorption Kinetics , 2001 .

[30]  G. Dagan,et al.  Contaminant transport in aquifers with spatially variable hydraulic and sorption properties , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[31]  Philippe Martinet,et al.  Modeling expected solute concentration in randomly heterogeneous flow systems with multicomponent reactions. , 2004, Environmental science & technology.

[32]  G. Dagan,et al.  Concentration fluctuations in aquifer transport: a rigorous first-order solution and applications , 2000 .

[33]  Vladimir Cvetkovic,et al.  Stochastic analysis of solute arrival time in heterogeneous porous media , 1988 .

[34]  On the applicability of analytical methods for estimating solute travel time statistics in nonuniform groundwater flow , 2001 .