Customization of Product Technology and International New Product Success: Mediating Effects of New Product Development and Rollout Timeliness

Offering a standardized product for different country markets may enable companies to accomplish fast product development and multicountry rollout, whereas also enjoying substantial cost benefits. However, not all manufacturers serving multicountry markets can adopt a standardized product strategy. Where technological requirements, standards, and approval procedures vary substantially across countries, manufacturers invariably must adapt the product's technology to fit individual country requirements. Extensive customization may lead to longer new product development and rollout times and increase the likelihood of delays in the entire project, hence adversely affecting overall new product outcome. This study examines the relationships between product technology customization, the timeliness in completion of both the new product development effort and international market launches, and new product success. The study that reports on new product launches across European markets, is based on personal interviews with senior managers in 30 multinational companies. The authors show that timeliness in new product development and timeliness in rolling out the new product into different country markets mediate the link between product technology customization and overall new product success. Customization of product technology increases the likelihood of delays in the completion of new product development projects and multicountry rollout. Additionally, the timeliness in new product development mediates the relationship between product technology customization and timeliness in international new product rollout. This means that if the NPD project runs behind schedule, a fault-free multicountry rollout program becomes increasingly unlikely, as problems encountered during product development spillover into the rollout program. The results imply that international product managers must assign greater priority to assessing the relative advantages of customizing new product technology and to consider the timing implications for both the NPD effort and subsequent rollout. Managers must set realistic schedules and allocate sufficient resources to ensure both tasks can be accomplished within planned time scales. Finally, managers should not underestimate the complexities and time involved in customizing new product technologies, including the completion of disparate country technical approval procedures.

[1]  C. Fornell,et al.  Sources of Market Pioneer Advantages in Consumer Goods Industries , 1985 .

[2]  T. Bonoma Case Research in Marketing: Opportunities, Problems, and a Process , 1985 .

[3]  Cok Ouwerkerk,et al.  An Inquiry into Successful Exporting , 1991 .

[4]  Richard J. Penlesky,et al.  Impediments to Timely Delivery of New Products at an Industrial Products Firm , 1992 .

[5]  D. Bowman,et al.  Determinants of Competitor Response Time to a New Product Introduction , 1995 .

[6]  Kwaku Atuahene-Gima,et al.  Adoption of New Products by the Sales Force: The Construct , 1997 .

[7]  Seev Hirsch,et al.  The export performance of six manufacturing industries : a comparative study of Denmark, Holland, and Israel , 1972 .

[8]  S. Cavusgil,et al.  Marketing Strategy-Performance Relationship: An Investigation of the Empirical Link in Export Market Ventures , 1994 .

[9]  Saeed Samiee,et al.  The Influence of Global Marketing Standardization on Performance , 1992 .

[10]  C. Craig,et al.  Advances in international marketing , 1992 .

[11]  Saeed Samiee,et al.  Customer Evaluation of Products in a Global Market , 1994 .

[12]  G. Kalyanaram,et al.  Order of Market Entry: Established Empirical Generalizations, Emerging Empirical Generalizations, and Future Research , 1995 .

[13]  A. Coskun Samli,et al.  Developing global products and marketing strategies: A construct and a research agenda , 1991 .

[14]  Glenn S. Omura,et al.  Sourcing Strategies of European and Japanese Multinationals: A Comparison , 1989 .

[15]  M. Parry,et al.  The Determinants of Japanese New Product Successes , 1997 .

[16]  Naveen Donthu,et al.  Implications of Firm Controllable Factors on Export Growth , 1993 .

[17]  R. Green,et al.  A Cross-National Comparison of Consumer Habits and Innovator Characteristics , 1975 .

[18]  L. James,et al.  Mediators, Moderators, and Tests for Mediation. , 1984 .

[19]  M. Kotabe,et al.  Linking Product and Process Innovations and Modes of International Sourcing in Global Competition: A Case of Foreign Multinational Firms , 1990 .

[20]  Robert G. Cooper,et al.  New Products : The Factors that Drive Success , 1994 .

[21]  A. Griffin Metrics for Measuring Product Development Cycle Time , 1993 .

[22]  Gregory S. Carpenter,et al.  Reflections on “Consumer Preference Formation and Pioneering Advantage” , 1994 .

[23]  N. Capon,et al.  Marketing and Technology: A Strategic Coalignment , 1987 .

[24]  Gregory S. Carpenter,et al.  Consumer Preference Formation and Pioneering Advantage , 1989 .

[25]  Robert G. Cooper,et al.  The Dimensions of Industrial New Product Success and Failure , 1979 .

[26]  B. Little,et al.  The Influence of Product Characteristics on the Export Performance of New Industrial Products , 1981 .

[27]  T. Levitt THE GLOBALIZATION OF MARKETS , 1983 .

[28]  Abdul Ali,et al.  Product innovativeness and entry strategy: Impact on cycle time and break-even time , 1995 .

[29]  David M. Schweiger,et al.  Global Strategy Implementation at the Business Unit Level: Operational Capabilities and Administrative Mechanisms , 1991 .

[30]  Alok K. Chakrabarti,et al.  Technological learning, strategic flexibility, and new product development in the pharmaceutical industry , 1996 .

[31]  Paul S. Adler,et al.  Antecedents of intergroup conflict in multifunctional product development teams: a conceptual model , 1994 .

[32]  M. Miles Qualitative Data as an Attractive Nuisance: The Problem of Analysis , 1979 .

[33]  K. Eisenhardt Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[34]  S. Jain,et al.  Standardization of International Marketing Strategy: Some Research Hypotheses , 1989 .

[35]  Steven C. Wheelwright,et al.  Accelerating the Design‐build‐test Cycle for Effective Product Development , 1994 .

[36]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[37]  J. Eckenrode,et al.  Mobility as a mediator of the effects of child maltreatment on academic performance. , 1995, Child development.

[38]  Adrian B. Ryans Strategic Market Entry Factors and Market Share Achievement in Japan , 1988 .

[39]  J. J. Ward Product and Promotion Adaptation by European Firms in the U.S , 1973 .

[40]  Joseph T. Vesey The new competitors: they think in terms of ‘speed-to-market’ , 1991 .

[41]  R. Linn,et al.  Assumptions in making causal inferences from part correlations, partal correlations, and partial regression coefficients. , 1969 .

[42]  P. Yeoh,et al.  Speed to Global Markets: An Empirical Prediction of New Product Success in the Ethical Pharmaceutical Industry , 1994 .

[43]  George Chryssochoidis,et al.  Rolling out new products across country markets: An empirical study of causes of delays , 1998 .

[44]  R. Cooper,et al.  Determinants of Timeliness in Product Development , 1994 .

[45]  Arthur C. Fatt The Danger of “Local” International Advertising , 1967 .

[46]  A. Griffin,et al.  An Interim Report on Measuring Product Development Success and Failure , 1993 .

[47]  Peter Walters International Marketing Policy: A Discussion of the Standardization Construct and its Relevance for Corporate Policy , 1986 .

[48]  Lawrence R. James,et al.  The unmeasured variables problem in path analysis. , 1980 .

[49]  D. Tookey Factors Associated With Success In Exporting , 1964 .

[50]  Preston G. Smith,et al.  Developing products in half the time , 1995 .

[51]  Jeannie L. Johnson,et al.  Ideal and actual product adaptation in US exporting firms , 1995 .

[52]  W. Keegan,et al.  Multinational Product Planning: Strategic Alternatives , 1969 .

[53]  Eli M. Noam,et al.  Broadcasting In Italy: An Overview , 1987 .

[54]  Y. Wind THE MYTH OF GLOBALIZATION , 1986 .

[55]  M. Porter Competition in Global Industries , 1986 .

[56]  T. Hout,et al.  Competing Against Time , 1990 .

[57]  S. Ghoshal,et al.  Internal differentiation within multinational corporations , 1989 .

[58]  A. Griffin The Effect of Project and Process Characteristics on Product Development Cycle Time , 1997 .

[59]  Naresh K. Malhotra,et al.  Standardization versus customization in international marketing: An investigation using bridging conjoint analysis , 1995 .

[60]  R. Sitgreaves Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). , 1979 .

[61]  S. Tamer Cavusgil,et al.  Product and Promotion Adaptation in Export Ventures: An Empirical Investigation , 1993 .

[62]  R. Deshpandé,et al.  “Paradigms Lost”: On Theory and Method in Research in Marketing , 1983 .

[63]  S. Ghoshal,et al.  Horses for Courses: Organizational Forms for Multinational Corporations , 1993 .

[64]  Stephen J. Kobrin,et al.  AN EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS OF THE DETERMINANTS OF GLOBAL INTEGRATION , 1991 .

[65]  Eric M. Olson,et al.  Organizing for effective new product development: The moderating role of product innovativeness. , 1995 .

[66]  P. Rajan Varadarajan,et al.  Standardization versus Adaptation of International Marketing Strategy: An Empirical Investigation , 1993 .

[67]  A. Chakrabarti,et al.  Innovation Speed: A Conceptual Model of Context, Antecedents, and Outcomes , 1996 .

[68]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT: PAST RESEARCH, PRESENT FINDINGS, AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS , 1995 .

[69]  G. Kalyanaram,et al.  Order-of-Entry Effects on Consumer Memory and Judgment: An Information Integration Perspective , 1992 .

[70]  I. MacMillan,et al.  Competitors' responses to easily imitated new products—exploring commercial banking product introductions , 1985 .