Diversity in FabLabs: Culture, Role Models and the Gendering of Making

Diversity and inclusion in the technology sector is increasingly debated, specially in the context of equal opportunities for all and a shortage of experts in many tech related industries. The need to be more inclusive can refer to different age groups, people with diverse culturally and linguistically backgrounds or gender. All in all, ethnic, gender and socio-economic diversity is not yet at the forefront of fabrication laboratories (FabLabs) agendas for change. This paper aims to contribute to the discussion of diversity and inclusion by primarily elaborating gender relations in FabLabs and, to a lesser extent, discussing age and socio-economic conditions of makers. Our analysis is based on 39 interviews and the analysis of 55,450 data points extracted from the log files of 3d-printers, CNC milling machines, laser cutters and cutting plotters. This combination of qualitative and quantitative data reveals that, indeed, some machines are used more frequently by men or women. However, the main difference is in absolute numbers, i.e. women are not joining FabLabs for a variety of reasons ranging from uninviting cultures to the lack of role models in technology driven areas in general.

[1]  S. Elo,et al.  Qualitative Content Analysis , 2014 .

[2]  Corinne Büching,et al.  FabLab: Of Machines, Makers and Inventors , 2013 .

[3]  P. Mayring Qualitative Content Analysis , 2000 .

[4]  Merete Lie,et al.  Feminism and Constructivism: Do Artifacts Have Gender? , 1995 .

[5]  Shaowen Bardzell,et al.  Making cultures: empowerment, participation, and democracy - or not? , 2014, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[6]  J. Wajcman Feminism Confronts Technology , 1991 .

[7]  Elisabeth Unterfrauner,et al.  Makers’ ambitions to do socially valuable things , 2017 .

[8]  A. Booth,et al.  Outside Offers and the Gender Pay Gap: Empirical Evidence from the UK Academic Labour Market , 2002 .

[9]  Susana Nascimento,et al.  Maker Cultures and the Prospects for Technological Action , 2018, Sci. Eng. Ethics.

[10]  W. Faulkner The technology question in feminism: A view from feminist technology studies , 2001 .

[11]  Bente Rasmussen,et al.  Excluding women from the technologies of the future , 1991 .

[12]  Robin Dunbar,et al.  How many "friends" can you really have? , 2011, IEEE Spectrum.

[13]  Neil Gershenfeld,et al.  How to Make Almost Anything , 2012 .

[14]  Massimo Menichinelli,et al.  An Empirically Informed Taxonomy for the Maker Movement , 2016, INSCI.

[15]  M. Mills,et al.  Attracting, recruiting and retaining male teachers: policy issues in the male teacher debate , 2004 .

[16]  Mohamad G. Alkadry,et al.  A Systematic Review of the Gender Pay Gap and Factors That Predict It , 2017 .

[17]  Fabrizio Sestini Collective Awareness Platforms: Engines for Sustainability and Ethics , 2012, IEEE Technology and Society Magazine.

[18]  Hasan Ozbekhan,et al.  THE TRIUMPH OF TECHNOLOGY: 'CAN' IMPLIES 'OUGHT'. , 1967 .

[19]  R. Meadus Men in Nursing: Barriers to Recruitment , 2000 .

[20]  S. Turkle,et al.  Epistemological Pluralism: Styles and Voices within the Computer Culture , 1990, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society.

[21]  Naihua Duan,et al.  Purposeful Sampling for Qualitative Data Collection and Analysis in Mixed Method Implementation Research , 2015, Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research.

[22]  R. Tiwari,et al.  Frugal Innovation in Scholarly and Social Discourse: An Assessment of Trends and Potential Societal Implications , 2016 .