Readiness of the Belgian network of sentinel general practitioners to deliver electronic health record data for surveillance purposes: results of survey study

BackgroundIn order to proceed from a paper based registration to a surveillance system that is based on extraction of electronic health records (EHR), knowledge is needed on the number and representativeness of sentinel GPs using a government-certified EHR system and the quality of EHR data for research, expressed in the compliance rate with three criteria: recording of home visits, use of prescription module and diagnostic subject headings.MethodsData were collected by annual postal surveys between 2005 and 2009 among all sentinel GPs. We tested relations between four key GP characteristics (age, gender, language community, practice organisation) and use of a certified EHR system by multivariable logistic regression. The relation between EHR software package, GP characteristics and compliance with three quality criteria was equally measured by multivariable logistic regression.ResultsA response rate of 99% was obtained. Of 221 sentinel GPs, 55% participated in the surveillance without interruption from 2005 onwards, i.e. all five years, and 78% were participants in 2009. Sixteen certified EHR systems were used among 91% of the Dutch and 63% of the French speaking sentinel GPs. The EHR software package was strongly related to the community and only one EHR system was used by a comparable number of sentinel GPs in both communities. Overall, the prescription module was always used and home visits were usually recorded. Uniform subject headings were only sometimes used and the compliance with this quality criterion was almost exclusively related to the EHR software package in use.ConclusionsThe challenge is to progress towards a sentinel network of GPs delivering care-based data that are (partly) extracted from well performing EHR systems and still representative for Belgian general practice.

[1]  A Hiddema-van de Wal,et al.  Towards improvement of the accuracy and completeness of medication registration with the use of an electronic medical record (EMR). , 2001, Family practice.

[2]  J. Kai,et al.  Networks for research in primary health care , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[3]  K. Thiru,et al.  Systematic review of scope and quality of electronic patient record data in primary care , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[4]  D. Fleming,et al.  Health monitoring in sentinel practice networks: the contribution of primary care. , 2003, European journal of public health.

[5]  Etienne De Clercq,et al.  Collecting information on the quality of prescribing in primary care using semi-automatic data extraction from GPs' electronic medical records , 2005, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[6]  Christel Faes,et al.  The denominator in general practice, a new approach from the Intego database. , 2005, Family practice.

[7]  D. Fleming,et al.  European primary care surveillance networks: their structure and operation. , 2006, Family practice.

[8]  P J E Bindels,et al.  Data quality improvement in general practice. , 2006, Family practice.

[9]  C. van Weel,et al.  Family practices registration networks contributed to primary care research. , 2006, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[10]  S. de Lusignan,et al.  The use of routinely collected computer data for research in primary care: opportunities and challenges. , 2006, Family practice.

[11]  Vincent Lorant,et al.  Research networks: can we use data from GPs' Electronic Health Records? , 2006, MIE.

[12]  D. Corens Belgium: health system review , 2007 .

[13]  D. B. Barr Good Clinical Practice (GCP) , 2008 .

[14]  Etienne De Clercq,et al.  Primary Healthcare Research Network: The Belgian ResoPrim Recommendations , 2009, MIE.

[15]  Amardeep Thind,et al.  Using your electronic medical record for research: a primer for avoiding pitfalls. , 2010, Family practice.

[16]  K. Mertens,et al.  Clinical surveillance of the influenza A(H1N1)2009 pandemic through the network of sentinel general practitioners , 2010, Archives of Public Health.