The Effect of Conceptual and Perceptual Fluency on Brand Evaluation

According to the processing fluency model, advertising exposures enhance the ease with which consumers recognize and process a brand. In turn, this increased perceptual fluency leads to consumers having more favorable attitudes toward the brand. The authors extend the processing fluency model to examine the effect of conceptual fluency on attitudes. In three experiments, the authors show that when a target comes to mind more readily and becomes conceptually fluent, as when it is presented in a predictive context (e.g., a bottle of beer featured in an advertisement that shows a man entering a bar) or when it is primed by a related construct (e.g., an image of ketchup following an advertisement of mayonnaise), participants develop more favorable attitudes toward the target. It is believed that positive valence of fluent processing underlies these processing-fluency effects. When conceptual fluency is associated with negative valence (e.g., hair conditioner primed by a lice-killing shampoo), the authors observe less favorable attitudes.

[1]  D. Berlyne Curiosity and exploration. , 1966, Science.

[2]  R. Zajonc Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. , 1968 .

[3]  D. Berlyne Novelty, complexity, and hedonic value , 1970 .

[4]  Daniel Kahneman,et al.  Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability , 1973 .

[5]  T. Ostrom,et al.  Repetition of highly similar messages and attitude change. , 1974 .

[6]  Allan Collins,et al.  A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing , 1975 .

[7]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Effects of message repetition and position on cognitive response, recall, and persuasion. , 1979 .

[8]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Issue involvement can increase or decrease persuasion by enhancing message-relevant cognitive responses. , 1979 .

[9]  R. Zajonc Feeling and thinking : Preferences need no inferences , 1980 .

[10]  L. Jacoby,et al.  On the relationship between autobiographical memory and perceptual learning. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[11]  E. Eich,et al.  Memory for unattended events: Remembering with and without awareness , 1984, Memory & cognition.

[12]  George Mandler,et al.  Nonspecific Effects of Exposure on Stimuli That Cannot Be Recognized , 1987 .

[13]  D. Schacter Implicit memory: History and current status. , 1987 .

[14]  Larry L. Jacoby,et al.  Unconscious Influences of Memory for a Prior Event , 1987 .

[15]  R. Bornstein Exposure and affect: Overview and meta-analysis of research, 1968–1987. , 1989 .

[16]  E. Tory Higgins,et al.  Knowledge accessibility and activation: Subjectivity and suffering from unconscious sources. , 1989 .

[17]  E Tulving,et al.  Priming and human memory systems. , 1990, Science.

[18]  R. Bornstein,et al.  Boredom as a limiting condition on the mere exposure effect , 1990 .

[19]  S. Hamann Level-of-processing effects in conceptually driven implicit tasks , 1990 .

[20]  Larry L. Jacoby,et al.  Illusions of immediate memory: evidence of an attributional basis for feelings of familiarity and perceptual quality , 1990 .

[21]  P. Nedungadi Recall and Consumer Consideration Sets: Influencing Choice without Altering Brand Evaluations , 1990 .

[22]  B. Sternthal,et al.  Perceptual fluency and affect without recognition , 1991, Memory & cognition.

[23]  F. Strack,et al.  Ease of retrieval as information: Another look at the availability heuristic. , 1991 .

[24]  H. Roediger,et al.  Direct comparison of two implicit memory tests: word fragment and word stem completion. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[25]  B. W. Whittlesea Illusions of familiarity. , 1993 .

[26]  Chris Janiszewski Preattentive Mere Exposure Effects , 1993 .

[27]  R. Cabeza,et al.  Dissociating conceptual priming, perceptual priming and explicit memory , 1993 .

[28]  H. Roediger Implicit memory in normal human subjects , 1993 .

[29]  Curtis P. Haugtvedt,et al.  Advertising Repetition and Variation Strategies: Implications for Understanding Attitude Strength , 1994 .

[30]  R. Bornstein,et al.  The Attribution and Discounting of Perceptual Fluency: Preliminary Tests of a Perceptual Fluency/Attributional Model of the Mere Exposure Effect , 1994 .

[31]  R. Rao,et al.  Can Repeating an Advertisement More Frequently than the Competition Affect Brand Preference in a Mature Market? , 1995 .

[32]  John G. Seamon,et al.  The mere exposure effect is based on implicit memory: Effects of stimulus type, encoding conditions, and number of exposures on recognition and affect judgments. , 1995 .

[33]  Herbert Bless,et al.  Subjective Experience Versus Content of Information in the Construction of Attitude Judgments , 1996 .

[34]  Michaela Wänke,et al.  There Are Many Reasons to Drive a BMW: Does Imagined Ease of Argument Generation Influence Attitudes? , 1997 .

[35]  D. MacInnis,et al.  The Effects of Incidental Ad Exposure on the Formation of Consideration Sets , 1997 .

[36]  N. Schwarz,et al.  Effects of Perceptual Fluency on Affective Judgments , 1998 .

[37]  Stewart Shapiro,et al.  When an Ad's Influence Is beyond Our Conscious Control: Perceptual and Conceptual Fluency Effects Caused by Incidental Ad Exposure , 1999 .

[38]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Mind at ease puts a smile on the face: psychophysiological evidence that processing facilitation elicits positive affect. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[39]  Angela Y. Lee The Mere Exposure Effect: An Uncertainty Reduction Explanation Revisited , 2001 .

[40]  G. Gorn,et al.  Absence Makes the Mind Grow Sharper: Effects of Element Omission on Subsequent Recall , 2002 .

[41]  Angela Y. Lee Effects of Implicit Memory on Memory-Based versus Stimulus-Based Brand Choice , 2002 .

[42]  Angela Y. Lee,et al.  Bringing the frame into focus: the influence of regulatory fit on processing fluency and persuasion. , 2004, Journal of personality and social psychology.