Treatment volume and tissue tolerance.

Hypotheses regarding tissue organization and radiation response were described and, on the basis of simple modeling, tentative conclusions were drawn regarding the influence on "tolerance" doses of tissue organization and the volume of an organ irradiated. (1) A functional subunit (FSU) may be defined structurally (e.g. as in a nephron), or only functionally, as the largest unit of cells capable of being regenerated from a surviving clonogenic cell without loss of the specified function. (2) Functional subunits may be arranged in parallel or in series: in parallel they give rise to graded dose responses, whereas in series, they give rise to threshold binary, or quantum responses. (3) Tolerance doses are a function of the number and radiosensitivity of target cells in an FSU, tissue organization and the functional reserve (i.e. the proportion of functional subunits necessary for adequate organ function). (4) An influence of treatment volume on "tolerance" doses is more likely to depend upon tissue organization than upon differences in cellular radiosensitivity. (5) The volume of tissue irradiated would be expected to be irrelevant to the "tolerance" of tissues showing a graded dose response (e.g. skin desquamation), except when the injury becomes severe, when tolerance for a large severe wound is likely to be less than for a small volume of injury, for non-radiobiological reasons. (6) Tissues with FSU's arranged in series, for example, spinal cord or peritoneal sheath along small bowel, should show a threshold-binary response. Sigmoid dose response curves should have a lower threshold and be steeper the larger the treatment volume. The effect of increase in volume is greatest with changes in small volumes: once a large number of FSU's are being irradiated, a further increase in volume has little effect on the position or slope of the probability curve for such complications. (7) Because their sigmoid dose-response curves are step, threshold-binary tissues are sensitive to small increases in "biologically effective" dose. For example, when the spinal cord is treated with large dose fractions the biological effectiveness per unit of dose increases sharply. Thus, using a large volume together with large dose fractions, as could happen in palliative prescriptions, could augment the danger of myelitis.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

[1]  J. Moore,et al.  Deriving absolute values of alpha and beta for dose fractionation, using dose-incidence data. , 1985, The British journal of radiology.

[2]  J H Hendry,et al.  The tissue-rescuing unit. , 1986, The British journal of radiology.

[3]  G. Fletcher,et al.  Analysis of complications following megavoltage therapy for squamous cell carcinomas of the tonsillar area. , 1966, The American journal of roentgenology, radium therapy, and nuclear medicine.

[4]  H. Withers,et al.  Post-operative radiotherapy for adenocarcinoma of the rectum and rectosigmoid. , 1977, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[5]  R. Potish Importance of predisposing factors in the development of enteric damage. , 1982, American journal of clinical oncology.

[6]  H. Withers The dose-survival relationship for irradiation of epithelial cells of mouse skin. , 1967, British Journal of Radiology.

[7]  W. M. Gray,et al.  Cumulative radiation effect. part IV. Normalisation of fractionated and continuous therapy - area and volume correction factors. , 1975, Clinical Radiology.

[8]  H. Withers,et al.  Radiosensitivity and fractionation response of crypt cells of mouse jejunum. , 1969, Radiation research.

[9]  M M Kligerman,et al.  A prospective study of treatment techniques to minimize the volume of pelvic small bowel with reduction of acute and late effects associated with pelvic irradiation. , 1986, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[10]  J. Hopewell,et al.  The effect of field size on the reaction of pig skin to single doses of X rays. , 1982, The British journal of radiology.

[11]  T E Schultheiss,et al.  Models in radiotherapy: volume effects. , 1983, Medical physics.

[12]  B. Jolles,et al.  Optimal skin tolerance dose levels. , 1947, The British journal of radiology.

[13]  R. Shymko,et al.  Field size dependence of radiation sensitivity and dose fractionation response in skin. , 1985, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[14]  A Dritschilo,et al.  The complication probability factor: a method for selection of radiation treatment plans. , 1978, The British journal of radiology.

[15]  J. M. Taylor,et al.  Dose fractionation and regeneration in radiotherapy for cancer of the oral cavity and oropharynx: tumor dose-response and repopulation. , 1989, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[16]  L. Shukovsky Dose, time, volume relationships in squamous cell carcinoma of the supraglottic larynx. , 1970, The American journal of roentgenology, radium therapy, and nuclear medicine.

[17]  N. Suzuki,et al.  Gradual regeneration of mouse testicular stem cells after exposure to ionizing radiation. , 1978, Radiation research.

[18]  G K Svensson,et al.  Optimization of radiation therapy: integral-response of a model biological system. , 1982, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[19]  H. Withers The effect of oxygen and anaesthesia on radiosensitivity in vivo of epithelial cells of mouse skin. , 1967, The British journal of radiology.

[20]  G. Fletcher,et al.  Time, dose and tumor volume relationships in megavoltage irradiation of squamous cell carcinomas of the retromolar trigone and anterior tonsillar pillar. , 1977, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[21]  G. Fletcher,et al.  DOSE-TIME-VOLUME RELATIONSHIP IN SQUAMOUS-CELL CARCINOMA OF THE LARYNX. , 1964, Radiology.

[22]  N. Berg,et al.  RELATION BETWEEN FIELD SIZE AND TOLERANCE OF RABBIT'S BRAIN TO ROENTGEN IRRADIATION (200KV) VIA A SLIT-SHAPED FIELD. , 1963, Acta radiologica: therapy, physics, biology.

[23]  C. Essen A SPATIAL MODEL OF TIME-DOSE-AREA RELATIONSHIPS IN RADIATION THERAPY. , 1963 .

[24]  H. Withers,et al.  Late radiation response of kidney assayed by tubule-cell survival. , 1986, The British journal of radiology.

[25]  B. Jolles Quantitative biological dose control in interstitial radium therapy. , 1946, The British journal of radiology.

[26]  J. Brown,et al.  The effects of single and multifraction radiation courses on the mouse spinal cord. , 1976, Radiology.

[27]  J. Sala,et al.  Palliation of advanced pelvic malignant disease with large fraction pelvic radiation and misonidazole: final report of RTOG phase I/II study. , 1986, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[28]  H. Suit,et al.  Therapeutic advantage in preoperative single‐dose radiation combined with conservative and radical surgery in different‐size murine fibrosarcomas , 1985, Journal of surgical oncology.

[29]  L Cohen,et al.  The tissue volume factor in radiation oncology. , 1982, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[30]  L. Cohen Derivation of cell population kinetic parameters from clinical statistical data (program RAD3). , 1978, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[31]  H. Withers,et al.  Microcolony survival assay for cells of mouse intestinal mucosa exposed to radiation. , 1970, International journal of radiation biology and related studies in physics, chemistry, and medicine.

[32]  G. Fletcher,et al.  Time, dose, and tumor volume relationships in irradiation of squamous cell carcinomas of the base of the tongue , 1976, Cancer.