Sharpening vision by adapting to flicker

Significance Distinct anatomical visual pathways can be traced through the human central nervous system. These have been linked to specialized functions, such as encoding information about spatial forms (like the human face and text) and stimulus dynamics (flicker or movement). Our experiments are inconsistent with this strict division. They show that mechanisms responsive to flicker can alter form perception, with vision transiently sharpened by weakening the influence of flicker-sensitive mechanisms by prolonged exposure to flicker. So, next time you are trying to read fine print, you might be well advised to first view a flickering stimulus! Human vision is surprisingly malleable. A static stimulus can seem to move after prolonged exposure to movement (the motion aftereffect), and exposure to tilted lines can make vertical lines seem oppositely tilted (the tilt aftereffect). The paradigm used to induce such distortions (adaptation) can provide powerful insights into the computations underlying human visual experience. Previously spatial form and stimulus dynamics were thought to be encoded independently, but here we show that adaptation to stimulus dynamics can sharpen form perception. We find that fast flicker adaptation (FFAd) shifts the tuning of face perception to higher spatial frequencies, enhances the acuity of spatial vision—allowing people to localize inputs with greater precision and to read finer scaled text, and it selectively reduces sensitivity to coarse-scale form signals. These findings are consistent with two interrelated influences: FFAd reduces the responsiveness of magnocellular neurons (which are important for encoding dynamics, but can have poor spatial resolution), and magnocellular responses contribute coarse spatial scale information when the visual system synthesizes form signals. Consequently, when magnocellular responses are mitigated via FFAd, human form perception is transiently sharpened because “blur” signals are mitigated.

[1]  D. Burr Motion smear , 1980, Nature.

[2]  D. Alais,et al.  Evidence for two interacting temporal channels in human visual processing , 2006, Vision Research.

[3]  Sarah L. Elliott,et al.  Response normalization and blur adaptation: data and multi-scale model. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[4]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Organization of visual inputs to the inferior temporal and posterior parietal cortex in macaques , 1991, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[5]  M. J. Wright,et al.  Visual motion and cortical velocity , 1983, Nature.

[6]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[7]  Robert Sekuler,et al.  Eye movements and imitation learning: intentional disruption of expectation. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[8]  DH Hubel,et al.  Psychophysical evidence for separate channels for the perception of form, color, movement, and depth , 1987, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[9]  D. Burr,et al.  Contrast sensitivity at high velocities , 1982, Vision Research.

[10]  D. G. Albrecht,et al.  Motion direction signals in the primary visual cortex of cat and monkey. , 2001, Visual neuroscience.

[11]  J. B. Levitt,et al.  Functional properties of neurons in macaque area V3. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[12]  D J Field,et al.  Relations between the statistics of natural images and the response properties of cortical cells. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[13]  D. Whitteridge,et al.  The representation of the visual field on the cerebral cortex in monkeys , 1961, The Journal of physiology.

[14]  Wilson S. Geisler,et al.  Motion streaks provide a spatial code for motion direction , 1999, Nature.

[15]  D. J. Felleman,et al.  Receptive field properties of neurons in area V3 of macaque monkey extrastriate cortex. , 1987, Journal of neurophysiology.

[16]  S. Shevell,et al.  Chromatic assimilation: spread light or neural mechanism? , 2005, Vision Research.

[17]  G. C. Grindley,et al.  Binocular Masking Induced by a Moving Object , 1965 .

[18]  S. Zeki Colour coding in the cerebral cortex: The reaction of cells in monkey visual cortex to wavelengths and colours , 1983, Neuroscience.

[19]  A. Oliva,et al.  Dr. Angry and Mr. Smile: when categorization flexibly modifies the perception of faces in rapid visual presentations , 1999, Cognition.

[20]  Leslie G. Ungerleider Two cortical visual systems , 1982 .

[21]  D G Pelli,et al.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[22]  S. Nishida Motion-Based Analysis of Spatial Patterns by the Human Visual System , 2004, Current Biology.

[23]  Michael A. Webster,et al.  Neural adjustments to image blur , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[24]  J. Rovamo,et al.  An estimation and application of the human cortical magnification factor , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[25]  J. Lederberg,et al.  Size Adaptation : A New Aftereffect , 1969 .

[26]  Harold E. Bedell,et al.  A target in real motion appears blurred in the absence of other proximal moving targets , 1995, Vision Research.

[27]  L. Maloney Evaluation of linear models of surface spectral reflectance with small numbers of parameters. , 1986, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[28]  Joel E. Brown,et al.  Interpolation Processes in the Perception of Real and Illusory Contours , 1997, Perception.

[29]  P. Lennie Single Units and Visual Cortical Organization , 1998, Perception.

[30]  Naoya Yokoyama,et al.  Neural Coding of Color , 2004 .

[31]  A. Parker Shifts in perceived periodicity induced by temporal modulation and their influence on the spatial frequency tuning of two aftereffects , 1981, Vision Research.