Apples and Oranges: Comparing Black Holes in X-Ray Binaries and Gravitational-wave Sources

The component black holes (BHs) observed in gravitational-wave (GW) binary black hole (BBH) events tend to be more massive and slower spinning than those observed in black hole X-ray binaries (BH-XRBs). Without modeling their evolutionary histories, we investigate whether these apparent tensions in the BH populations can be explained by GW observational selection effects alone. We find that this is indeed the case for the discrepancy between BH masses in BBHs and the observed high-mass X-ray binaries (HMXBs), when we account for statistical uncertainty from the small sample size of just three HMXBs. On the other hand, the BHs in observed low-mass X-ray binaries (LMXBs) are significantly lighter than the astrophysical BBH population, but this may just be due to a correlation between component masses in a binary system. Given their light stellar companions, we expect light BHs in LMXBs. The observed spins in HMXBs and LMXBs, however, are in tension with the inferred BBH spin distribution at the >99.9% level. We discuss possible scenarios behind the significantly larger spins in observed BH-XRBs. One possibility is that a small subpopulation (conservatively <30%) of BBHs have rapidly spinning primary components, indicating that they may have followed a similar evolutionary pathway to the observed HMXBs. In LMXBs, it has been suggested that BHs can spin up by accretion. If LMXB natal spins follow the BBH spin distribution, we find LMXBs must gain an average dimensionless spin of 0.47−0.11+0.10 , but if their natal spins follow the observed HMXB spins, the average spin-up must be <0.03.

[1]  S. Tsygankov,et al.  Black hole spin–orbit misalignment in the x-ray binary MAXI J1820+070 , 2021, Science.

[2]  H. Janka,et al.  Supernova Fallback as Origin of Neutron Star Spins and Spin-kick Alignment , 2021, The Astrophysical Journal.

[3]  A. Olejak,et al.  The Implications of High Black Hole Spins for the Origin of Binary Black Hole Mergers , 2021, The Astrophysical Journal Letters.

[4]  I. Mandel,et al.  Building Better Spin Models for Merging Binary Black Holes: Evidence for Nonspinning and Rapidly Spinning Nearly Aligned Subpopulations , 2021, The Astrophysical Journal Letters.

[5]  I. Mandel,et al.  Conditions for accretion disc formation and observability of wind-accreting X-ray binaries , 2021, Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia.

[6]  N. Langer,et al.  X-ray emission from BH+O star binaries expected to descend from the observed galactic WR+O binaries , 2021, Astronomy & Astrophysics.

[7]  T. Callister,et al.  Who Ordered That? Unequal-mass Binary Black Hole Mergers Have Larger Effective Spins , 2021, The Astrophysical Journal Letters.

[8]  Marlin B. Schäfer,et al.  3-OGC: Catalog of Gravitational Waves from Compact-binary Mergers , 2021, The Astrophysical Journal.

[9]  J. Rodriguez,et al.  The INTEGRAL view on Black Hole X-ray Binaries , 2021, 2105.05547.

[10]  L. Stella,et al.  Exploring higher order images with Fe Kα-lines from relativistic discs: black hole spin determination and bias , 2021, 2104.07707.

[11]  N. Stone,et al.  The Observed Mass Distribution of Galactic Black Hole LMXBs Is Biased against Massive Black Holes , 2021, The Astrophysical Journal.

[12]  I. Mandel,et al.  Cygnus X-1 contains a 21–solar mass black hole—Implications for massive star winds , 2021, Science.

[13]  I. Mandel,et al.  Wind Mass-loss Rates of Stripped Stars Inferred from Cygnus X-1 , 2021, 2102.09092.

[14]  C. Reynolds.  Observational Constraints on Black Hole Spin , 2020, Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics.

[15]  M. J. Williams,et al.  Population Properties of Compact Objects from the Second LIGO–Virgo Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog , 2020, 2010.14533.

[16]  J. Miller,et al.  Black hole spin in X-ray binaries: giving uncertainties an f , 2020, 2010.11948.

[17]  G. Sabhahit,et al.  Maximum black hole mass across cosmic time , 2020, 2010.11730.

[18]  P. Podsiadlowski,et al.  Pre-supernova evolution, compact-object masses, and explosion properties of stripped binary stars , 2020, Astronomy & Astrophysics.

[19]  C. Berry,et al.  You Can’t Always Get What You Want: The Impact of Prior Assumptions on Interpreting GW190412 , 2020, The Astrophysical Journal.

[20]  I. Mandel,et al.  Simple recipes for compact remnant masses and natal kicks , 2020, 2006.08360.

[21]  I. Mandel,et al.  An Alternative Interpretation of GW190412 as a Binary Black Hole Merger with a Rapidly Spinning Secondary , 2020, The Astrophysical Journal.

[22]  G. Salvesen,et al.  Origin of spin–orbit misalignments: the microblazar V4641 Sgr , 2020, 2004.08392.

[23]  A. Heger,et al.  The impact of fallback on the compact remnants and chemical yields of core-collapse supernovae , 2020, 2003.04320.

[24]  A. Lundgren,et al.  2-OGC: Open Gravitational-wave Catalog of Binary Mergers from Analysis of Public Advanced LIGO and Virgo Data , 2019, The Astrophysical Journal.

[25]  I. Mandel,et al.  The origin of spin in binary black holes , 2019, Astronomy & Astrophysics.

[26]  M. Fishbach,et al.  Picky Partners: The Pairing of Component Masses in Binary Black Hole Mergers , 2019, The Astrophysical Journal.

[27]  I. Mandel,et al.  Constraining the masses of microlensing black holes and the mass gap with Gaia DR2 , 2019, Astronomy & Astrophysics.

[28]  K. Covey,et al.  A noninteracting low-mass black hole–giant star binary system , 2019, Science.

[29]  G. Nelemans,et al.  Potential kick velocity distribution of black hole X-ray binaries and implications for natal kicks , 2019, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

[30]  Linhao Ma,et al.  Most Black Holes Are Born Very Slowly Rotating , 2019, The Astrophysical Journal.

[31]  W. Farr,et al.  Constraining the Black Hole Initial Mass Function with LIGO/Virgo Observations , 2019, The Astrophysical Journal.

[32]  M. S. Shahriar,et al.  Binary Black Hole Population Properties Inferred from the First and Second Observing Runs of Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo , 2018, The Astrophysical Journal.

[33]  Alexander H. Nitz,et al.  1-OGC: The First Open Gravitational-wave Catalog of Binary Mergers from Analysis of Public Advanced LIGO Data , 2018, The Astrophysical Journal.

[34]  V. Kalogera,et al.  On the Origin of Black Hole Spin in High-mass X-Ray Binaries , 2018, The Astrophysical Journal.

[35]  Colm Talbot,et al.  An introduction to Bayesian inference in gravitational-wave astronomy: Parameter estimation, model selection, and hierarchical models , 2018, Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia.

[36]  J. Gair,et al.  Extracting distribution parameters from multiple uncertain observations with selection biases , 2018, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

[37]  M. Zaldarriaga,et al.  Constraints on binary black hole populations from LIGO–Virgo detections , 2018, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

[38]  M. Fishbach,et al.  Does the Black Hole Merger Rate Evolve with Redshift? , 2018, The Astrophysical Journal.

[39]  G. Meynet,et al.  The spin of the second-born black hole in coalescing binary black holes , 2018, Astronomy & Astrophysics.

[40]  J. Brinchmann,et al.  A detached stellar-mass black hole candidate in the globular cluster NGC 3201 , 2018, 1801.05642.

[41]  Eric Thrane,et al.  Measuring the Binary Black Hole Mass Spectrum with an Astrophysically Motivated Parameterization , 2018, 1801.02699.

[42]  C. Reynolds,et al.  Exploring the Effects of Disk Thickness on the Black Hole Reflection Spectrum , 2017, 1712.05418.

[43]  C. Fryer,et al.  The Formation of Rapidly Rotating Black Holes in High-mass X-Ray Binaries , 2017, 1708.00570.

[44]  Ilya Mandel,et al.  University of Birmingham Distinguishing Spin-Aligned and Isotropic Black Hole Populations With Gravitational Waves , 2017 .

[45]  Ilya Mandel,et al.  Hierarchical analysis of gravitational-wave measurements of binary black hole spin–orbit misalignments , 2017, 1703.06873.

[46]  J. Kollmeier,et al.  Research Note: The Expected Spins of Gravitational Wave Sources With Isolated Field Binary Progenitors , 2017, 1702.00885.

[47]  J. Kollmeier,et al.  GW150914: spin-based constraints on the merger time of the progenitor system , 2016, 1605.03839.

[48]  F. Bauer,et al.  BlackCAT: A catalogue of stellar-mass black holes in X-ray transients , 2015, 1510.08869.

[49]  T. Maccarone,et al.  Revisiting the dynamical case for a massive black hole in IC10 X-1 , 2015, 1506.03882.

[50]  The Ligo Scientific Collaboration.  Advanced LIGO , 2014, 1411.4547.

[51]  C. Broeck,et al.  Advanced Virgo: a second-generation interferometric gravitational wave detector , 2014, 1408.3978.

[52]  Jon M. Miller,et al.  The Masses and Spins of Neutron Stars and Stellar-Mass Black Holes , 2014, 1408.4145.

[53]  P. Jonker,et al.  Mass Measurements of Stellar and Intermediate-Mass Black Holes , 2013, Space Science Reviews.

[54]  W. Farr,et al.  Formation of the black-hole binary M33 X-7 through mass exchange in a tight massive system , 2010, Nature.

[55]  B. Skiff,et al.  VizieR Online Data Catalog , 2009 .

[56]  J. McClintock,et al.  X-Ray Properties of Black-Hole Binaries , 2006, astro-ph/0606352.

[57]  N. University,et al.  Bounds on Expected Black Hole Spins in Inspiraling Binaries , 2005, astro-ph/0503219.

[58]  T. Loredo.  Accounting for Source Uncertainties in Analyses of Astronomical Survey Data , 2004, astro-ph/0409387.

[59]  T. Tauris,et al.  Formation and evolution of compact stellar X-ray sources , 2003, astro-ph/0303456.

[60]  S. Rappaport,et al.  On the formation and evolution of black hole binaries , 2002, astro-ph/0207153.

[61]  McMillan,et al.  Black Hole Mergers in the Universe , 1999, The Astrophysical journal.

[62]  V. Kalogera.  Submitted to The Astrophysical Journal. Spin–Orbit Misalignment in Close Binaries with Two Compact Objects , 1999 .