Antibacterial properties of bioactive glass particle abraded titanium against Streptococcus mutans

The purpose of this study was to evaluate effects of titanium surfaces air-abraded with particles of Bioglass® 45S5 and three-ZnO and SrO doped compositions on the viability, adhesion and biofilm formation of Streptococcus mutans. A statistically significant decrease in the viability of S. mutans was observed for all titanium discs air-particle abraded with the BAGs (p < 0.001). Also, a significant effect on diminishing biofilm formation on the titanium discs was seen for all BAGs (p < 0.01). No differences were noticed in S. mutans adhesion on titanium surfaces treated with different glasses (p = 0.964). Static SBF immersion experiments showed that after 2 and 48 h the BAG doped with 4 mol% ZnO demonstrated the highest Zn2+ ion concentration released into SBF (0.2 mg L−1). 45S5 BAG demonstrated the highest statistically significant increase in the pH throughout the 120 min of static immersion (p < 0.001). In conclusion, we showed that titanium alloy discs abraded with particles of the experimental compositions and 45S5 BAG had strong antimicrobial activity against S. mutans and they suppressed S. mutans biofilm formation. The antimicrobial activity of 45S5 BAG was attributed to high pH whereas for the Zn-containing BAGs antimicrobial activity was due to steady release of Zn2+ into the interfacial solution.

[1]  H. Hasan,et al.  In-vitro efficacy of different morphology zinc oxide nanopowders on Streptococcus sobrinus and Streptococcus mutans. , 2017, Materials science & engineering. C, Materials for biological applications.

[2]  A. Sood,et al.  Zinc and Wound Healing: A Review of Zinc Physiology and Clinical Applications. , 2017, Wounds : a compendium of clinical research and practice.

[3]  F. Fortune,et al.  Strontium-substituted bioactive glasses in vitro osteogenic and antibacterial effects. , 2016, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[4]  J. Massera,et al.  Dissolution behavior of the bioactive glass S53P4 when sodium is replaced by potassium, and calcium with magnesium or strontium , 2016 .

[5]  E. Schulten,et al.  10-year survival rate and the incidence of peri-implant disease of 374 titanium dental implants with a SLA surface: a prospective cohort study in 177 fully and partially edentulous patients. , 2015, Clinical oral implants research.

[6]  Yingjun Wang,et al.  Concentration ranges of antibacterial cations for showing the highest antibacterial efficacy but the least cytotoxicity against mammalian cells: implications for a new antibacterial mechanism. , 2015, Chemical research in toxicology.

[7]  A. Boccaccini,et al.  Zinc-containing bioactive glasses for bone regeneration, dental and orthopedic applications , 2015 .

[8]  I. Yeo.  Reality of Dental Implant Surface Modification: A Short Literature Review , 2014, The open biomedical engineering journal.

[9]  P. Vallittu,et al.  Optimizing the concentration of quaternary ammonium dimethacrylate monomer in bis-GMA/TEGDMA dental resin system for antibacterial activity and mechanical properties , 2014, Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine.

[10]  M. Hupa,et al.  Dissolution patterns of biocompatible glasses in 2-amino-2-hydroxymethyl-propane-1,3-diol (Tris) buffer. , 2013, Acta biomaterialia.

[11]  M. Hupa,et al.  Dissolution Kinetics of a Bioactive Glass by Continuous Measurement , 2012 .

[12]  Zihui Li,et al.  Biofunctionalization of a titanium surface with a nano-sawtooth structure regulates the behavior of rat bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells , 2012, International journal of nanomedicine.

[13]  M. Brooker,et al.  Pyrosequencing reveals unique microbial signatures associated with healthy and failing dental implants. , 2012, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[14]  D. Brauer,et al.  Predicting the bioactivity of glasses using the network connectivity or split network models , 2011 .

[15]  Hongyi Li,et al.  Effects of TiO2 nanotubes with different diameters on gene expression and osseointegration of implants in minipigs. , 2011, Biomaterials.

[16]  N. Jakubovics,et al.  Stick to Your Gums , 2011, Journal of dental research.

[17]  N. Lang,et al.  Comparative biology of chronic and aggressive periodontitis vs. peri-implantitis. , 2010, Periodontology 2000.

[18]  P. Vallittu,et al.  Adherence of Streptococcus mutans to Fiber-Reinforced Filling Composite and Conventional Restorative Materials , 2009, The open dentistry journal.

[19]  Eveliina Munukka,et al.  Antibacterial effects and dissolution behavior of six bioactive glasses. , 2009, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[20]  Bjarni E Pjetursson,et al.  A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of implant supported fixed dental prostheses with cantilever extensions after an observation period of at least 5 years. , 2009, Clinical oral implants research.

[21]  H. Yonezawa,et al.  Inhibiting effects of Streptococcus salivarius on competence-stimulating peptide-dependent biofilm formation by Streptococcus mutans. , 2009, Oral microbiology and immunology.

[22]  J. Shibli,et al.  Composition of supra- and subgingival biofilm of subjects with healthy and diseased implants. , 2008, Clinical oral implants research.

[23]  Nicola U Zitzmann,et al.  Definition and prevalence of peri-implant diseases. , 2008, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[24]  S. Ivanovski,et al.  Systematic review of implant outcomes in treated periodontitis subjects. , 2008, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[25]  T. Peltola,et al.  Antibacterial effect of bioactive glasses on clinically important anaerobic bacteria in vitro , 2008, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[26]  Maxwell H. Anderson,et al.  Interspecies Interactions within Oral Microbial Communities , 2007, Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews.

[27]  A. Piattelli,et al.  Implant surface analysis and microbiologic evaluation of failed implants retrieved from smokers. , 2007, The Journal of oral implantology.

[28]  J. Ferreira,et al.  Development and in vitro characterization of sol-gel derived CaO-P2O5-SiO2-ZnO bioglass. , 2007, Acta biomaterialia.

[29]  Jiang Chang,et al.  Characterization and in vitro Bioactivity of Zinc-containing Bioactive Glass and Glass-ceramics , 2006, Journal of biomaterials applications.

[30]  C. Robinson,et al.  Early plaque formation on fibre-reinforced composites in vivo , 2005, Clinical Oral Investigations.

[31]  J. Shibli,et al.  Microbiologic and radiographic analysis of ligature-induced peri-implantitis with different dental implant surfaces. , 2003, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[32]  H. Newman,et al.  Particulate Bioglass reduces the viability of bacterial biofilms formed on its surface in an in vitro model. , 2002, Clinical oral implants research.

[33]  O. Yamamoto,et al.  Influence of particle size on the antibacterial activity of zinc oxide , 2001 .

[34]  Michael T. Wilson,et al.  Antibacterial activity of particulate bioglass against supra- and subgingival bacteria. , 2001, Biomaterials.

[35]  T G Wilson,et al.  Biological complications with dental implants: their prevention, diagnosis and treatment. , 2000, Clinical oral implants research.

[36]  E. Söderling,et al.  Antibacterial effects of a bioactive glass paste on oral microorganisms. , 1998, Acta odontologica Scandinavica.

[37]  M. Tonetti,et al.  Risk factors for osseodisintegration. , 1998, Periodontology 2000.

[38]  M. Gillespie,et al.  Osteoclasts from Human Giant Cell Tumors of Bone Lack Estrogen Receptors* , 2022 .

[39]  T Kitsugi,et al.  Solutions able to reproduce in vivo surface-structure changes in bioactive glass-ceramic A-W. , 1990, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[40]  L. Hench,et al.  Bioactive Ceramics , 1988, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[41]  N. Lang,et al.  The microbiota associated with successful or failing osseointegrated titanium implants. , 1987, Oral microbiology and immunology.

[42]  S. Hamada,et al.  Biology, immunology, and cariogenicity of Streptococcus mutans. , 1980, Microbiological reviews.

[43]  L L Hench,et al.  Direct chemical bond of bioactive glass-ceramic materials to bone and muscle. , 1973, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[44]  N. Monesi,et al.  Microbiome of titanium and zirconia dental implants abutments. , 2016, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[45]  T. Peltola,et al.  Bactericidal effects of bioactive glasses on clinically important aerobic bacteria , 2008, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[46]  A. Ito,et al.  Fabrication of Zn containing apatite cement and its initial evaluation using human osteoblastic cells. , 2002, Biomaterials.

[47]  J. Sawai,et al.  Hydrogen Peroxide as an Antibacterial Factor in Zinc Oxide Powder Slurry , 1998 .

[48]  H. Tsuchiya,et al.  In vivo plaque formation on implant materials. , 1989, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.