Pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions for adults with ADHD: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Introduction It is unclear how pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions compare with each other in terms of efficacy and tolerability for core symptoms and additional problems in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). We aim to conduct the first network meta-analysis (NMA) comparing pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions (or their combinations) in adults with ADHD. Methods and analysis We will follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement for NMAs. We will search a broad set of electronic databases/registries and contact drug companies and experts in the field to retrieve published and unpublished randomised controlled trials (RCTs) (parallel or cross-over) of medications (either licensed or unlicensed) and any non-pharmacological intervention in adults (≥18 years) with ADHD. Primary outcomes will be: (1) change in severity of ADHD core symptoms, and (2) acceptability (all-cause discontinuation). Secondary outcomes will include tolerability (drop-out due to side effects) and change in the severity of emotional dysregulation, executive dysfunctions and quality of life. The risk of bias in each individual RCT included in the NMA will be assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool-version 2. We will evaluate the transitivity assumption comparing the distribution of possible effect modifiers across treatment comparisons. We will perform Bayesian NMA for each outcome with random-effects model in OpenBUGS. Pooled estimates of NMA will be obtained using the Markov Chains Monte Carlo method. We will judge the credibility in the evidence derived from the NMA using the CINeMA tool (which includes assessment of publication bias). We will conduct a series of sensitivity analyses to assess the robustness of the findings. Ethics and dissemination As this is the protocol for an aggregate-data level NMA, ethical approval will not be required. Results will be disseminated at national/international conferences and in peer-reviewed journals. PROSPERO registration number CRD42021265576.

[1]  M. Page,et al.  ROB-MEN: a tool to assess risk of bias due to missing evidence in network meta-analysis , 2021, BMC Medicine.

[2]  P. Cuijpers,et al.  Comparative efficacy and acceptability of psychotherapies for post-traumatic stress disorder in children and adolescents: a systematic review and network meta-analysis , 2021, Evidence-Based Mental Health.

[3]  K. Georgiades,et al.  Prevalence of childhood mental disorders in high-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis to inform policymaking , 2021, Evidence-Based Mental Health.

[4]  R. Findling,et al.  Viloxazine in the Management of CNS Disorders: A Historical Overview and Current Status , 2021, CNS Drugs.

[5]  B. D’Onofrio,et al.  Prediction of treatment dosage and duration from free-text prescriptions: an application to ADHD medications in the Swedish prescribed drug register , 2021, Evidence-Based Mental Health.

[6]  I. Rudan,et al.  The prevalence of adult attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: A global systematic review and meta-analysis , 2021, Journal of global health.

[7]  C. Fairburn,et al.  Comparative efficacy and acceptability of psychological interventions for the treatment of adult outpatients with anorexia nervosa: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. , 2020, The lancet. Psychiatry.

[8]  S. Cortese Pharmacologic Treatment of Attention Deficit-Hyperactivity Disorder. , 2020, The New England journal of medicine.

[9]  C. Correll,et al.  Association between mental disorders and somatic conditions: protocol for an umbrella review , 2020, Evidence-Based Mental Health.

[10]  Catherine Brennan Status , 2020, Max Weber on Power and Social Stratification.

[11]  P. Cuijpers,et al.  Comparative efficacy and acceptability of antidepressants, psychotherapies, and their combination for acute treatment of children and adolescents with depressive disorder: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. , 2020, The lancet. Psychiatry.

[12]  Julian P T Higgins,et al.  CINeMA: An approach for assessing confidence in the results of a network meta-analysis , 2020, PLoS medicine.

[13]  J. Iida,et al.  Effect of Continuing and Discontinuing Medications on Quality of Life After Symptomatic Remission in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. , 2020, The Journal of clinical psychiatry.

[14]  R. Greenwood,et al.  Non-pharmacological interventions for adult ADHD: a systematic review , 2020, Psychological Medicine.

[15]  D. Daley,et al.  The economic burden of adult attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: A sibling comparison cost analysis , 2019, European Psychiatry.

[16]  J. Buitelaar,et al.  Emerging challenges in pharmacotherapy research on attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder-outcome measures beyond symptom control and clinical trials. , 2019, The lancet. Psychiatry.

[17]  F. Shokraneh,et al.  Comparative efficacy and tolerability of medications for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder in children, adolescents, and adults: a systematic review and network meta-analysis , 2018, The lancet. Psychiatry.

[18]  S. Chaplin,et al.  Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: diagnosis and management , 2018, Progress in Neurology and Psychiatry.

[19]  S. Cortese,et al.  Pharmacotherapy of emotional dysregulation in adults with ADHD: A systematic review and meta-analysis , 2018, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[20]  K. Nilsson,et al.  Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Adults With ADHD in Outpatient Psychiatric Care , 2017, Journal of attention disorders.

[21]  S. Dias,et al.  Data extraction for complex meta-analysis (DECiMAL) guide , 2016, Systematic Reviews.

[22]  John T. Mitchell,et al.  Method of adult diagnosis influences estimated persistence of childhood ADHD: a systematic review of longitudinal studies. , 2016, The lancet. Psychiatry.

[23]  H. Geurts,et al.  Effects of methylphenidate on executive functioning in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder across the lifespan: a meta-regression analysis , 2016, Psychological Medicine.

[24]  M. Abdel-Hamid,et al.  Effects of Group Psychotherapy, Individual Counseling, Methylphenidate, and Placebo in the Treatment of Adult Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: A Randomized Clinical Trial. , 2015, JAMA psychiatry.

[25]  Kristian Thorlund,et al.  The PRISMA Extension Statement for Reporting of Systematic Reviews Incorporating Network Meta-analyses of Health Care Interventions: Checklist and Explanations , 2015, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[26]  N. Lindefors,et al.  Living SMART — A randomized controlled trial of a guided online course teaching adults with ADHD or sub-clinical ADHD to use smartphones to structure their everyday life , 2015 .

[27]  Rebecca M. Turner,et al.  Predictive distributions were developed for the extent of heterogeneity in meta-analyses of continuous outcome data , 2015, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[28]  Anna Chaimani,et al.  Evaluating the Quality of Evidence from a Network Meta-Analysis , 2014, PloS one.

[29]  Panagiota Spyridonos,et al.  Graphical Tools for Network Meta-Analysis in STATA , 2013, PloS one.

[30]  Andrea Cipriani,et al.  Conceptual and Technical Challenges in Network Meta-analysis , 2013, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[31]  Julian P T Higgins,et al.  Evaluation of inconsistency in networks of interventions. , 2013, International journal of epidemiology.

[32]  AE Ades,et al.  Consistency and inconsistency in network meta-analysis: concepts and models for multi-arm studies‡ , 2012, Research synthesis methods.

[33]  Georgia Salanti,et al.  Indirect and mixed‐treatment comparison, network, or multiple‐treatments meta‐analysis: many names, many benefits, many concerns for the next generation evidence synthesis tool , 2012, Research synthesis methods.

[34]  Simon G Thompson,et al.  Predicting the extent of heterogeneity in meta-analysis, using empirical data from the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews , 2012, International journal of epidemiology.

[35]  Georgia Salanti,et al.  Graphical methods and numerical summaries for presenting results from multiple-treatment meta-analysis: an overview and tutorial. , 2011, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[36]  J. Higgins,et al.  Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions , 2010, International Coaching Psychology Review.

[37]  Andrew Thomas,et al.  The BUGS project: Evolution, critique and future directions , 2009, Statistics in medicine.

[38]  Alex J Sutton,et al.  Contour-enhanced meta-analysis funnel plots help distinguish publication bias from other causes of asymmetry. , 2008, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[39]  D. Altman,et al.  Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[40]  T. Lumley Network meta‐analysis for indirect treatment comparisons , 2002, Statistics in medicine.

[41]  D G Altman,et al.  Statistics Notes: Detecting skewness from summary information , 1996, BMJ.

[42]  Jan K. Buitelaar,et al.  Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder , 2015, Nature Reviews Disease Primers.

[43]  Andrea Cipriani,et al.  Imputing missing standard deviations in meta-analyses can provide accurate results. , 2006, Journal of clinical epidemiology.