Measuring patient engagement: development and psychometric properties of the Patient Health Engagement (PHE) Scale

Beyond the rhetorical call for increasing patients' engagement, policy makers recognize the urgency to have an evidence-based measure of patients' engagement and capture its effect when planning and implementing initiatives aimed at sustaining the engagement of consumers in their health. In this paper, authors describe the Patient Health Engagement Scale (PHE-scale), a measure of patient engagement that is grounded in rigorous conceptualization and appropriate psychometric methods. The scale was developed based on our previous conceptualization of patient engagement (the PHE-model). In particular, the items of the PHE-scale were developed based on the findings from the literature review and from interviews with chronic patients. Initial psychometric analysis was performed to pilot test a preliminary version of the items. The items were then refined and administered to a national sample of chronic patients (N = 382) to assess the measure's psychometric performance. A final phase of test-retest reliability was performed. The analysis showed that the PHE Scale has good psychometric properties with good correlation with concurrent measures and solid reliability. Having a valid and reliable measure to assess patient engagement is the first step in understanding patient engagement and its role in health care quality, outcomes, and cost containment. The PHE Scale shows a promising clinical relevance, indicating that it can be used to tailor intervention and assess changes after patient engagement interventions.

[1]  S. Allen.  Engaging with patients , 2020, Nursing management.

[2]  On the language and content of patient engagement. , 2012, The Journal of ambulatory care management.

[3]  Peter Patka,et al.  Societal consequences of falls in the older population: injuries, healthcare costs, and long-term reduced quality of life. , 2011, The Journal of trauma.

[4]  S. Triberti,et al.  Patient Engagement: A Consumer-Centered Model to Innovate Healthcare , 2015 .

[5]  J. Aston,et al.  How To Engage , 2017 .

[6]  C. Camargo,et al.  US population aging and demand for inpatient services. , 2014, Journal of hospital medicine.

[7]  Richard Cb Slack,et al.  Measuring the Impact , 1998 .

[8]  H. Ward,et al.  Predictive Validity of a Medication Adherence Measure in an Outpatient Setting , 2008, Journal of clinical hypertension.

[9]  Giuseppe Riva,et al.  Technologies for patient engagement. , 2013, Health affairs.

[10]  A. Coulter.  Patient Engagement—What Works? , 2012, The Journal of ambulatory care management.

[11]  J. Fleiss.  The design and analysis of clinical experiments , 1987 .

[12]  Micah B. Hartman,et al.  US health spending trends by age and gender: selected years 2002-10. , 2014, Health affairs.

[13]  C. Lam,et al.  Validation of the International Prostate Symptom Score in Chinese males and females with lower urinary tract symptoms , 2014, Health and Quality of Life Outcomes.

[14]  S. Dwinger,et al.  Psychometric evaluation of the German version of the patient activation measure (PAM13) , 2013, BMC Public Health.

[15]  S. Staniszewska,et al.  Measuring the impact of patient and public involvement: the need for an evidence base. , 2008, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[16]  A. Furnham.  Response bias, social desirability and dissimulation , 1986 .

[17]  A. Renedo,et al.  Healthcare professionals' representations of ‘patient and public involvement’ and creation of ‘public participant’ identities: Implications for the development of inclusive and bottom-up community participation initiatives , 2011 .

[18]  B. Wright.  Reasonable mean-square fit values , 1994 .

[19]  G. Graffigna,et al.  Ethics and etiquette in neonatal intensive care: the value of parents' engagement in everyday ethics and recommendations for further advancing the field. , 2015, JAMA pediatrics.

[20]  K. Davis,et al.  A 2020 vision of patient-centered primary care , 2005, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[21]  Bruno D. Zumbo,et al.  Ordinal Versions of Coefficients Alpha and Theta for Likert Rating Scales , 2007 .

[22]  P. Barone,et al.  Adherence to anti-Parkinson drug therapy in the “REASON” sample of Italian patients with Parkinson’s disease: the linguistic validation of the Italian version of the “Morisky Medical Adherence scale-8 items” , 2013, Neurological Sciences.

[23]  G. Graffigna,et al.  Engaging patients to recover life projectuality: an Italian cross-disease framework , 2015, Quality of Life Research.

[24]  Judith H Hibbard,et al.  Toward a theory of patient and consumer activation. , 2010, Patient education and counseling.

[25]  A. Coulter.  Leadership for patient engagement , 2012 .

[26]  Catherine L. Mann,et al.  Measuring the Impact , 2003 .

[27]  R. Borgatti,et al.  A dynamic system analysis of dyadic flexibility and stability across the Face-to-Face Still-Face procedure: application of the State Space Grid. , 2015, Infant behavior & development.

[28]  R. Iedema,et al.  Finding the patient in patient safety , 2013, Health.

[29]  Judith H Hibbard,et al.  Development and testing of a short form of the patient activation measure. , 2005, Health services research.

[30]  K. Pearson.  Mathematical contributions to the theory of evolution. VIII. On the correlation of characters not quantitatively measurable , 2022, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London.

[31]  B. Zumbo,et al.  ORDINAL VERSIONS OF COEFFICIENT ALPHA AND THETA FOR LIKERT SCALE , 2007 .

[32]  E. Vegni,et al.  Uncovering and validating clinicians' experiential knowledge when facing difficult conversations: a cross-cultural perspective. , 2012, Patient education and counseling.

[33]  Lukas Steinmann,et al.  Aging and Future Healthcare Expenditure: A Consistent Approach , 2007 .

[34]  Giuseppe Riva,et al.  How to make health information technology effective: the challenge of patient engagement. , 2013, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[35]  M. Crawford,et al.  Systematic review of involving patients in the planning and development of health care , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[36]  K. Kovacs Burns,et al.  Exploring patient engagement practices and resources within a health care system: Applying a multi-phased mixed methods knowledge mobilization approach , 2014 .

[37]  Adrian R Levy,et al.  Self-Reported Morisky Score for Identifying Nonadherence with Cardiovascular Medications , 2004, The Annals of pharmacotherapy.

[38]  Kate L. Daunt,et al.  Value Co-Creation through Patient Engagement in Health Care: A micro-level approach and research agenda , 2015 .

[39]  Daniela Villani,et al.  Patient's choice of observational strategy for early-stage prostate cancer , 2012 .

[40]  C. Yi,et al.  Psychometric Properties of the Korean Version of the “Patient Activation Measure 13” (PAM13-K) in Patients With Osteoarthritis , 2015, Evaluation & the health professions.

[41]  Patient engagement in health care. , 2011, Health services research.

[42]  Serena Barello,et al.  The Challenges of Conceptualizing Patient Engagement in Health Care: A Lexicographic Literature Review , 2014 .

[43]  R. Magnezi,et al.  Psychometric Properties of the Hebrew Translation of the Patient Activation Measure (PAM-13) , 2014, PloS one.

[44]  A. Janvier,et al.  Ethics and etiquette in neonatal intensive care. , 2014, JAMA pediatrics.

[45]  J. Hibbard,et al.  Development of the Patient Activation Measure (PAM): conceptualizing and measuring activation in patients and consumers. , 2004, Health services research.

[46]  P. Vedsted,et al.  Translation, adaptation and validation of the American short form Patient Activation Measure (PAM13) in a Danish version , 2009, BMC public health.

[47]  Giuseppe Riva,et al.  Positive Technology as a Driver for Health Engagement , 2013, Annual Review of Cybertherapy and Telemedicine.

[48]  G. Graffigna,et al.  How to engage type-2 diabetic patients in their own health management: implications for clinical practice , 2014, BMC Public Health.

[49]  W. Herrmann,et al.  Validation of the German Version of the Patient Activation Measure 13 (PAM13-D) in an International Multicentre Study of Primary Care Patients , 2013, PloS one.

[50]  E. Molinari,et al.  The ACTonHEART study: rationale and design of a randomized controlled clinical trial comparing a brief intervention based on Acceptance and Commitment Therapy to usual secondary prevention care of coronary heart disease , 2014, Health and Quality of Life Outcomes.

[51]  G. Cantaluppi,et al.  A new estimator of Zumbo’s Ordinal Alpha: a copula approach , 2015 .

[52]  Edoardo Lozza,et al.  Giving patients a starring role in their own care: a bibliometric analysis of the on‐going literature debate , 2014, Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy.

[53]  J. Hibbard,et al.  Why Does Patient Activation Matter? An Examination of the Relationships Between Patient Activation and Health-Related Outcomes , 2012, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[54]  F. Lombardi,et al.  ‘Engage me in taking care of my heart’: a grounded theory study on patient–cardiologist relationship in the hospital management of heart failure , 2015, BMJ Open.

[55]  G. Graffigna,et al.  Engaging patients in health management: towards a preliminary theoretical conceptualization , 2014 .

[56]  L. Green,et al.  Concurrent and Predictive Validity of a Self-reported Measure of Medication Adherence , 1986, Medical care.

[57]  Andrea Bonanomi,et al.  Measuring patient activation in Italy: Translation, adaptation and validation of the Italian version of the patient activation measure 13 (PAM13-I) , 2015, BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making.

[58]  N. Fulop,et al.  Developing a ‘critical’ approach to patient and public involvement in patient safety in the NHS: learning lessons from other parts of the public sector? , 2012, Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy.