Assessing the influence of return density on estimation of lidar-based aboveground biomass in tropical peat swamp forests of Kalimantan, Indonesia

The airborne lidar system (ALS) provides a means to efficiently monitor the status of remote tropical forests and continues to be the subject of intense evaluation. However, the cost of ALS acquisition can vary significantly depending on the acquisition parameters, particularly the return density (i.e., spatial resolution) of the lidar point cloud. This study assessed the effect of lidar return density on the accuracy of lidar metrics and regression models for estimating aboveground biomass (AGB) and basal area (BA) in tropical peat swamp forests (PSF) in Kalimantan, Indonesia. A large dataset of ALS covering an area of 123,000 ha was used in this study. This study found that cumulative return proportion (CRP) variables represent a better accumulation of AGB over tree heights than height-related variables. The CRP variables in power models explained 80.9% and 90.9% of the BA and AGB variations, respectively. Further, it was found that low-density (and low-cost) lidar should be considered as a feasible option for assessing AGB and BA in vast areas of flat, lowland PSF. The performance of the models generated using reduced return densities as low as 1/9 returns per m2 also yielded strong agreement with the original high-density data. The use model-based statistical inferences enabled relatively precise estimates of the mean AGB at the landscape scale to be obtained with a fairly low-density of 1/4 returns per m2, with less than 10% standard error (SE). Further, even when very low-density lidar data was used (i.e., 1/49 returns per m2) the bias of the mean AGB estimates were still less than 10% with a SE of approximately 15%. This study also investigated the influence of different DTM resolutions for normalizing the elevation during the generation of forest-related lidar metrics using various return densities point cloud. We found that the high-resolution digital terrain model (DTM) had little effect on the accuracy of lidar metrics calculation in PSF. The accuracy of low-density lidar metrics in PSF was more influenced by the density of aboveground returns, rather than the last return. This is due to the flat topography of the study area. The results of this study will be valuable for future economical and feasible assessments of forest metrics over large areas of tropical peat swamp ecosystems.

[1]  Pete Watt,et al.  The influence of LiDAR pulse density on the precision of inventory metrics in young unthinned Douglas-fir stands during initial and subsequent LiDAR acquisitions , 2014, New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science.

[2]  Terje Gobakken,et al.  Assessing effects of laser point density, ground sampling intensity, and field sample plot size on biophysical stand properties derived from airborne laser scanner data , 2008 .

[3]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[4]  Corinne Le Quéré,et al.  Carbon emissions from land use and land-cover change , 2012 .

[5]  R. Morley Development and vegetation dynamics of a lowland ombrogenous peat swamp in Kalimantan Tengah, Indonesia , 1981 .

[6]  Nicholas C. Coops,et al.  Assessment of forest structure with airborne LiDAR and the effects of platform altitude , 2006 .

[7]  S. Roxburgh,et al.  Guidelines for constructing allometric models for the prediction of woody biomass: How many individuals to harvest? , 2015 .

[8]  R. Dubayah,et al.  Above-ground biomass estimation in closed canopy Neotropical forests using lidar remote sensing: factors affecting the generality of relationships , 2003 .

[9]  Cristopher Brack,et al.  Tree biomass equations for tropical peat swamp forest ecosystems in Indonesia , 2014 .

[10]  Robert J. McGaughey,et al.  Monitoring selective logging in western Amazonia with repeat lidar flights , 2014 .

[11]  M. Keller,et al.  Airborne lidar-based estimates of tropical forest structure in complex terrain: opportunities and trade-offs for REDD+ , 2015, Carbon Balance and Management.

[12]  Christiane Schmullius,et al.  TanDEM-X data for aboveground biomass retrieval in a tropical peat swamp forest , 2015 .

[13]  S. Page,et al.  The amount of carbon released from peat and forest fires in Indonesia during 1997 , 2002, Nature.

[14]  G. Asner,et al.  Mapping tropical forest carbon: Calibrating plot estimates to a simple LiDAR metric , 2014 .

[15]  Yasumasa Hirata,et al.  Estimation of aboveground biomass in mangrove forests using high-resolution satellite data , 2014, Journal of Forest Research.

[16]  Erik Næsset,et al.  Effects of different flying altitudes on biophysical stand properties estimated from canopy height and density measured with a small-footprint airborne scanning laser , 2004 .

[17]  Marek K. Jakubowski,et al.  Tradeoffs between lidar pulse density and forest measurement accuracy , 2013 .

[18]  M. d'Oliveira,et al.  Estimating forest biomass and identifying low-intensity logging areas using airborne scanning lidar in Antimary State Forest, Acre State, Western Brazilian Amazon , 2012 .

[19]  Terje Gobakken,et al.  Effects of Pulse Density on Digital Terrain Models and Canopy Metrics Using Airborne Laser Scanning in a Tropical Rainforest , 2015, Remote. Sens..

[20]  Demetrios Gatziolis,et al.  Modeling Forest Aboveground Biomass and Volume Using Airborne LiDAR Metrics and Forest Inventory and Analysis Data in the Pacific Northwest , 2014, Remote. Sens..

[21]  G. Sileshi A critical review of forest biomass estimation models, common mistakes and corrective measures , 2014 .

[22]  Christopher J. Banks,et al.  Global and regional importance of the tropical peatland carbon pool , 2011 .

[23]  Jacob Strunk,et al.  Effects of lidar pulse density and sample size on a model-assisted approach to estimate forest inventory variables , 2012 .

[24]  Sandra Englhart,et al.  Aboveground biomass retrieval in tropical forests — The potential of combined X- and L-band SAR data use , 2011 .

[25]  A. Hudak,et al.  A Comparison of Accuracy and Cost of LiDAR versus Stand Exam Data for Landscape Management on the Malheur National Forest , 2011, Journal of Forestry.

[26]  J. Anderson The flora of the peat swamp forests of Sarawak and Brunei, including a catalogue of all recorded species of flowering plants, ferns, and fern allies. , 1963 .

[27]  Johan E. S. Fransson,et al.  Effects on estimation accuracy of forest variables using different pulse density of laser data , 2007 .

[28]  Ronald E. McRoberts,et al.  Probability- and model-based approaches to inference for proportion forest using satellite imagery as ancillary data , 2010 .

[29]  L. Verchot,et al.  Opportunities for reducing greenhouse gas emissions in tropical peatlands , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[30]  Soo Chin Liew,et al.  Two decades of destruction in Southeast Asia's peat swamp forests , 2012 .

[31]  David A. Coomes,et al.  Global wood density database , 2009 .

[32]  Ron Kohavi,et al.  A Study of Cross-Validation and Bootstrap for Accuracy Estimation and Model Selection , 1995, IJCAI.

[33]  W Shotyk,et al.  Interdependence of peat and vegetation in a tropical peat swamp forest. , 1999, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[34]  Ross K. Meentemeyer,et al.  Effects of LiDAR point density and landscape context on estimates of urban forest biomass , 2015 .

[35]  Susan Page,et al.  A record of Late Pleistocene and Holocene carbon accumulation and climate change from an equatorial peat bog (Kalimantan, Indonesia): implications for past, present and future carbon dynamics , 2004 .

[36]  Txomin Hermosilla,et al.  Analysis of the Influence of Plot Size and LiDAR Density on Forest Structure Attribute Estimates , 2014 .

[37]  L. Amekudzi,et al.  Carbon dioxide fluxes from contrasting ecosystems in the Sudanian Savanna in West Africa , 2015, Carbon Balance and Management.

[38]  Susan E. Page,et al.  PEAT-CO2. Assessment of CO2 emissions from drained peatlands in SE Asia , 2006 .

[39]  L. Verchot,et al.  Greenhouse gas emission factors for land use and land-use change in Southeast Asian peatlands , 2014, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change.

[40]  Hideki Saito,et al.  Estimating above-ground biomass of tropical rainforest of different degradation levels in Northern Borneo using airborne LiDAR , 2014 .

[41]  F. Siegert,et al.  Increased damage from fires in logged forests during droughts caused by El Niño , 2001, Nature.

[42]  S. Reutebuch,et al.  A rigorous assessment of tree height measurements obtained using airborne lidar and conventional field methods , 2006 .

[43]  Terje Gobakken,et al.  Accuracy and Precision for Remote Sensing Applications of Nonlinear Model-Based Inference , 2013, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing.

[44]  W. Cohen,et al.  Geographic variability in lidar predictions of forest stand structure in the Pacific Northwest , 2005 .

[45]  Juilson Jubanski,et al.  Detection of large above-ground biomass variability in lowland forest ecosystems by airborne LiDAR , 2012 .

[46]  Sandra Englhart,et al.  Quantifying Dynamics in Tropical Peat Swamp Forest Biomass with Multi-Temporal LiDAR Datasets , 2013, Remote. Sens..