E-Planning Through the Wisconsin Land Information Program: The Contexts of Power, Politics and Scale

Through the lenses of Critical GIS and political economy, this paper examines the history of the Wisconsin Land Information Program (WLIP), which was created in 1989 and provides an early US example of the adoption of GIS at the local government level. Using a mixed methods approach and a case study design, the authors focus on the cooperation and conflicts among various actors and networks, at and between scales, during times of plentiful and lean resources. Catalyzed by the 1978 Larsen Report, the WLIP was unique in its inclusiveness of everyone involved in land records management. University academics brought together all the stakeholders to create a thematic and territorial network with political power and a unique funding mechanism. As land use planning and state budget deficits became prominent, the program became a target, leading to conflict and power struggles, particularly with the state Department of Administration (DOA). What began as an egalitarian, grass-roots, socially just, forward-thinking program has shape-shifted, and while the WLIP is still a viable and functioning program, its egalitarian goals have been subverted by economics.

[1]  F. Harvey,et al.  The Imbrication of Geography and Technology: The Social Construction of Geographic Information Systems , 2004 .

[2]  Rina Ghose,et al.  Politics of Scale and Networks of Association in Public Participation GIS , 2007 .

[3]  Rina Ghose,et al.  The complexities of citizen participation through collaborative governance , 2005 .

[4]  Raul P. Lejano,et al.  Mapping the industrial archeology of Boston , 2004 .

[5]  K. Cox Spaces of dependence, spaces of engagement and the politics of scale, or: looking for local politics , 1998 .

[6]  Zorica Nedovic-Budic,et al.  The Impact of GIS Technology , 1998 .

[7]  H. Leitner,et al.  The political construction of scale , 1997 .

[8]  J. Agnew The dramaturgy of horizons: geographical scale in the ‘Reconstruction of Italy’ by the new Italian political parties, 1992–1995 , 1997 .

[9]  N. Brenner,et al.  Cities and the Geographies of “Actually Existing Neoliberalism” , 2002 .

[10]  Sarah Elwood,et al.  PPGIS in Community Development Planning: Framing the Organizational Context , 2001, Cartogr. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Geovisualization.

[11]  N. Schuurman Trouble in the heartland: GIS and its critics in the 1990s , 2000 .

[12]  George Towers Cultural Dasymetric Population Mapping with Historical GIS: A Case Study from the Southern Appalachians , 2011, Int. J. Appl. Geospat. Res..

[13]  Nadine Schuurman,et al.  Formalization Matters: Critical GIS and Ontology Research , 2006 .

[14]  E. Sheppard,et al.  Networks, Governance, and the Politics of Scale: Inter‐Urban Networks and the European Union , 2008 .

[15]  S. Marston The social construction of scale , 2000 .

[16]  Rina Ghose,et al.  Use of Information Technology for Community Empowerment: Transforming Geographic Information Systems into Community Information Systems , 2001, Trans. GIS.