Personalizing Persuasive Strategies in Gameful Systems to Gamification User Types

Persuasive gameful systems are effective tools for motivating behaviour change. Research has shown that tailoring these systems to individuals can increase their efficacy; however, there is little knowledge on how to personalize them. We conducted a large-scale study of 543 participants to investigate how different gamification user types responded to ten persuasive strategies depicted in storyboards representing persuasive gameful health systems. Our results reveal that people's gamification user types play significant roles in the perceived persuasiveness of different strategies. People scoring high in the 'player' user type tend to be motivated by competition, comparison, cooperation, and reward while 'disruptors' are likely to be demotivated by punishment, goal-setting, simulation, and self-monitoring. 'Socialisers' could be motivated using any of the strategies; they are the most responsive to persuasion overall. Finally, we contribute to CHI research and practice by offering design guidelines for tailoring persuasive gameful systems to each gamification user type.

[1]  Rik Crutzen,et al.  A Web-based computer-tailored game to reduce binge drinking among 16 to 18 year old Dutch adolescents: development and study protocol , 2014, BMC Public Health.

[2]  Elena Paslaru Bontas Simperl,et al.  Improving Paid Microtasks through Gamification and Adaptive Furtherance Incentives , 2015, WWW.

[3]  Juho Hamari,et al.  "Working out for likes": An empirical study on social influence in exercise gamification , 2015, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[4]  J. Miner Organizational Behavior 1: Essential Theories of Motivation and Leadership , 2005 .

[5]  Juho Hamari,et al.  Do Persuasive Technologies Persuade? - A Review of Empirical Studies , 2014, PERSUASIVE.

[6]  H. Oinas-Kukkonen,et al.  Persuasive Features in Web-Based Alcohol and Smoking Interventions: A Systematic Review of the Literature , 2011, Journal of medical Internet research.

[7]  Edward L. Deci,et al.  Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior , 1975, Perspectives in Social Psychology.

[8]  E. Deci,et al.  Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation , 2000 .

[9]  Stoyan R. Stoyanov,et al.  Gamification for health and wellbeing: A systematic review of the literature , 2016, Internet interventions.

[10]  Pearl Pu,et al.  HealthyTogether: exploring social incentives for mobile fitness applications , 2014, Chinese CHI '14.

[11]  Bianca Zimmer,et al.  An Adaptive, Structural and Content Gamification Concept for Regulated Daily Routines , 2015, BIODEVICES.

[12]  Marc Busch,et al.  The Gamification User Types Hexad Scale , 2016, CHI PLAY.

[13]  Adolfo Villafiorita,et al.  An Adaptive Learning with Gamification & Conversational UIs: The Rise of CiboPoliBot , 2017, UMAP.

[14]  Maria Letizia Jaccheri,et al.  User requirements for gamifying sports software , 2013, 2013 3rd International Workshop on Games and Software Engineering: Engineering Computer Games to Enable Positive, Progressive Change (GAS).

[15]  Harri Oinas-Kukkonen,et al.  Persuasive Systems Design: Key Issues, Process Model, and System Features , 2009, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[16]  Vandana Naik,et al.  Adaptive and Gamified Learning Environment (AGLE) , 2015, 2015 IEEE Seventh International Conference on Technology for Education (T4E).

[17]  Peter Johannes Schulz,et al.  The Effect of Social Support Features and Gamification on a Web-Based Intervention for Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients: Randomized Controlled Trial , 2015, Journal of medical Internet research.

[18]  Michael D. Buhrmester,et al.  Amazon's Mechanical Turk , 2011, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[19]  Iván Cantador,et al.  Validating Gamification Mechanics and Player Types in an E-learning Environment , 2015, EC-TEL.

[20]  Rita Orji,et al.  Recommender Systems for Personalized Gamification , 2017, UMAP.

[21]  Juho Hamari,et al.  Does Gamification Work? -- A Literature Review of Empirical Studies on Gamification , 2014, 2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[22]  B. J. Fogg,et al.  Persuasive technology: using computers to change what we think and do , 2002, UBIQ.

[23]  Marko Sarstedt,et al.  PLS-SEM: Indeed a Silver Bullet , 2011 .

[24]  Gregory D. Abowd,et al.  Storyboarding: an empirical determination of best practices and effective guidelines , 2006, DIS '06.

[25]  Rik Crutzen,et al.  Effects of a Web-Based Computer-Tailored Game to Reduce Binge Drinking Among Dutch Adolescents: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial , 2016, Journal of Medical Internet Research.

[26]  J. Cafazzo,et al.  Design of an mHealth App for the Self-management of Adolescent Type 1 Diabetes: A Pilot Study , 2012, Journal of medical Internet research.

[27]  Boris E. R. de Ruyter,et al.  Adaptive Persuasive Systems: A Study of Tailored Persuasive Text Messages to Reduce Snacking , 2012, TIIS.

[28]  S. Schinke,et al.  Alcohol Abuse Prevention Among High-Risk Youth , 2005, Journal of prevention & intervention in the community.

[29]  Oren Zuckerman,et al.  Deconstructing gamification: evaluating the effectiveness of continuous measurement, virtual rewards, and social comparison for promoting physical activity , 2014, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[30]  Elke E. Mattheiss,et al.  UMAP 2017 Fifty Shades of Personalization - Workshop on Personalization in Serious and Persuasive Games and Gameful Interactions: Organizers' Welcome & Organization , 2017, UMAP.

[31]  E. Kupek,et al.  Beyond logistic regression: structural equations modelling for binary variables and its application to investigating unobserved confounders , 2006, BMC medical research methodology.

[32]  Stavros Asimakopoulos,et al.  Does Social User Experience Improve Motivation for Runners? - A Diary Study Comparing Mobile Health Applications , 2014, HCI.

[33]  Marko Sarstedt,et al.  Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): An emerging tool in business research , 2014 .

[34]  Elke E. Mattheiss,et al.  More than Sex: The Role of Femininity and Masculinity in the Design of Personalized Persuasive Games , 2016, PERSUASIVE.

[35]  Chrysanne Di Marco,et al.  Towards Personality-driven Persuasive Health Games and Gamified Systems , 2017, CHI.

[36]  Keiko Yamamoto,et al.  Stand Up, Heroes! : Gamification for Standing People on Crowded Public Transportation , 2013, HCI.

[37]  Frank Bentley,et al.  Comparing the Reliability of Amazon Mechanical Turk and Survey Monkey to Traditional Market Research Surveys , 2017, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[38]  Rita Orji,et al.  Persuasive technology for health and wellness: State-of-the-art and emerging trends , 2018, Health Informatics J..

[39]  R. Walton,et al.  Gamification for health promotion: systematic review of behaviour change techniques in smartphone apps , 2016, BMJ Open.

[40]  Edwin A. Locke,et al.  New developments in goal setting and task performance. , 2013 .

[41]  Julita Vassileva,et al.  Improving the Efficacy of Games for Change Using Personalization Models , 2017, ACM Trans. Comput. Hum. Interact..

[42]  Mária Bieliková,et al.  Motivating Learners by Dynamic Score and Personalized Activity Stream , 2014, 2014 9th International Workshop on Semantic and Social Media Adaptation and Personalization.

[43]  Jo Mitchell,et al.  MindMax: Using videogames and sport to engage young men and improve wellbeing , 2017 .

[44]  Nilufar Baghaei,et al.  Physical activity motivating games: virtual rewards for real activity , 2010, CHI.

[45]  Pedro A. Toledo,et al.  Enhancing the engagement of intelligent tutorial systems through personalization of gamification , 2016 .

[46]  Harri Oinas-Kukkonen,et al.  Exploring Perceived Persuasiveness of a Behavior Change Support System: A Structural Model , 2012, PERSUASIVE.

[47]  Siddharth Suri,et al.  Conducting behavioral research on Amazon’s Mechanical Turk , 2010, Behavior research methods.

[48]  Maria Adler,et al.  Science and human behavior , 2017 .

[49]  Silvia Riva,et al.  Interactive Sections of an Internet-Based Intervention Increase Empowerment of Chronic Back Pain Patients: Randomized Controlled Trial , 2014, Journal of medical Internet research.

[50]  Julita Vassileva,et al.  Modeling the efficacy of persuasive strategies for different gamer types in serious games for health , 2014, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction.

[51]  Julie A. Kientz,et al.  Personality and Persuasive Technology: An Exploratory Study on Health-Promoting Mobile Applications , 2010, PERSUASIVE.

[52]  S. Rafaeli,et al.  Studying Gamification: The Effect of Rewards and Incentives on Motivation , 2015 .

[53]  Deborah I. Fels,et al.  Gamification in theory and action: A survey , 2015, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[54]  James Noble,et al.  A Qualitative Study of Culture and Persuasion in a Smoking Cessation Game , 2008, PERSUASIVE.

[55]  S. Sundar,et al.  Personalization versus Customization: The Importance of Agency, Privacy, and Power Usage , 2010 .

[56]  Lennart E. Nacke,et al.  From game design elements to gamefulness: defining "gamification" , 2011, MindTrek.

[57]  Christof Weinhardt,et al.  Well-Being's Predictive Value - A Gamified Approach to Managing Smart Communities , 2013, HCI.

[58]  Amon Rapp,et al.  From Games to Gamification: A Classification of Rewards in World of Warcraft for the Design of Gamified Systems , 2017 .

[59]  E. Deci,et al.  Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. , 2000, The American psychologist.

[60]  Julita Vassileva,et al.  Tailoring persuasive health games to gamer type , 2013, CHI.

[61]  H. Kaiser A second generation little jiffy , 1970 .

[62]  Isabela Gasparini,et al.  Gamification in e-Learning Systems: A Conceptual Model to Engage Students and Its Application in an Adaptive e-Learning System , 2015, HCI.

[63]  G. Bodenhausen,et al.  Personalized Persuasion , 2012, Psychological science.

[64]  Gustavo Fortes Tondello,et al.  Elements of Gameful Design Emerging from User Preferences , 2017, CHI PLAY.

[65]  Robertas Damasevicius,et al.  Computational Evaluation of Effects of Motivation Reinforcement on Player Retention , 2017, J. Univers. Comput. Sci..

[66]  Tracy A. Dennis,et al.  Mental Health on the Go , 2014, Clinical psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[67]  Harri Oinas-Kukkonen,et al.  Understanding persuasion contexts in health gamification: A systematic analysis of gamified health behavior change support systems literature , 2016, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[68]  G. Fong,et al.  Reductions in HIV risk-associated sexual behaviors among black male adolescents: effects of an AIDS prevention intervention. , 1992, American journal of public health.

[69]  Joaquim A. Jorge,et al.  Studying student differentiation in gamified education: A long-term study , 2017, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[70]  Julita Vassileva,et al.  Motivating participation in social computing applications: a user modeling perspective , 2012, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction.

[71]  Corrie van der Lelie,et al.  The value of storyboards in the product design process , 2006, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[72]  Bin Xu,et al.  Personality-targeted Gamification: A Survey Study on Personality Traits and Motivational Affordances , 2016, CHI.

[73]  Saskia M. Kelders,et al.  'This Is Your Life!' - The Design of a Positive Psychology Intervention Using Metaphor to Motivate , 2014, PERSUASIVE.

[74]  R. Orji,et al.  DESIGN FOR BEHAVIOUR CHANGE: A MODEL-DRIVEN APPROACH FOR TAILORING PERSUASIVE TECHNOLOGIES , 2014 .

[75]  Sébastien George,et al.  Toward an Adaptive Gamification System for Learning Environments , 2014, CSEDU.

[76]  Wynne W. Chin The partial least squares approach for structural equation modeling. , 1998 .

[77]  Markus Bick,et al.  Towards adaptive Gamification: a synthesis of current Developments , 2017, ECIS.

[78]  Patrícia Augustin Jaques,et al.  What do students do on-line? Modeling students' interactions to improve their learning experience , 2016, Comput. Hum. Behav..