Preserving Porcine Genetics: A Simple and Effective Method for On-Site Cryopreservation of Ear Tissue Using Direct Cover Vitrification

Cell cryopreservation is widely used for porcine genetic conservation; however, isolating and freezing primary cells in farms without adequate experimental equipment and environment poses a significant challenge. Therefore, it is necessary to establish a quick and simple method to freeze tissues on-site, which can be used for deriving primary fibroblasts when needed to achieve porcine genetic conservation. In this study, we explored a suitable approach for porcine ear tissue cryopreservation. The porcine ear tissues were cut into strips and frozen by direct cover vitrification (DCV) in the cryoprotectant solution with 15% EG, 15% DMSO and 0.1 M trehalose. Histological analysis and ultrastructural evaluation revealed that thawed tissues had normal tissue structure. More importantly, viable fibroblasts could be derived from these tissues frozen in liquid nitrogen for up to 6 months. Cells derived from thawed tissues did not show any cell apoptosis, had normal karyotypes and could be used for nuclear transfer. These results suggest that this quick and simple ear tissue cryopreservation method can be applied for porcine genetic conservation, especially in the face of a deadly emerging disease in pigs.

[1]  K. Su,et al.  Vitrification freezing of large ovarian tissue in the human body , 2019, Journal of Ovarian Research.

[2]  A. Rodrigues,et al.  Vitrification of domestic cat (Felis catus) ovarian tissue: Effects of three different sugars. , 2018, Cryobiology.

[3]  Zheng-Wen Nie,et al.  Melatonin prevents postovulatory oocyte aging and promotes subsequent embryonic development in the pig , 2017, Aging.

[4]  J. Platt,et al.  Generation of a Stable Transgenic Swine Model Expressing a Porcine Histone 2B-eGFP Fusion Protein for Cell Tracking and Chromosome Dynamics Studies , 2017, PloS one.

[5]  P. Comizzoli,et al.  The preservation of vital functions in cat ovarian tissues during vitrification depends more on the temperature of the cryoprotectant exposure than on the sucrose supplementation. , 2016, Cryobiology.

[6]  B. Best Cryoprotectant Toxicity: Facts, Issues, and Questions , 2015, Rejuvenation research.

[7]  U. Eichenlaub-Ritter,et al.  Slow-freezing versus vitrification for human ovarian tissue cryopreservation , 2015, Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics.

[8]  Yu-Ling Zhang,et al.  Blastocysts cloned from the Putian Black pig ear tissues frozen without cryoprotectant at -80 and -196 degrees Celsius for 3 yrs. , 2012, Theriogenology.

[9]  S. Xiao,et al.  Pathogenesis of nonsuppurative encephalitis caused by highly pathogenic Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus , 2012, Journal of veterinary diagnostic investigation : official publication of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc.

[10]  A. Rodrigues,et al.  Vitrification of bovine ovarian tissue by the solid-surface vitrification method. , 2010, Biopreservation and biobanking.

[11]  J. Ferreira,et al.  Cryopreservation of equine embryos with glycerol plus sucrose and glycerol plus 1,2-propanediol. , 2010, Equine veterinary journal. Supplement.

[12]  Shaorong Gao,et al.  Linking Incomplete Reprogramming to the Improved Pluripotency of Murine Embryonal Carcinoma Cell-Derived Pluripotent Stem Cells , 2010, PloS one.

[13]  H. Ohta,et al.  Production of healthy cloned mice from bodies frozen at −20°C for 16 years , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[14]  W. Fan,et al.  Novel needle immersed vitrification: a practical and convenient method with potential advantages in mouse and human ovarian tissue cryopreservation. , 2008, Human reproduction.

[15]  Chung-Wu Lin,et al.  Novel direct cover vitrification for cryopreservation of ovarian tissues increases follicle viability and pregnancy capability in mice. , 2006, Human reproduction.

[16]  D. Wolf,et al.  Coculture of monkey ovarian tissue increases survival after vitrification and slow-rate freezing. , 2005, Fertility and sterility.

[17]  G. Haddad,et al.  Role of trehalose phosphate synthase and trehalose during hypoxia: from flies to mammals , 2004, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[18]  M. Toner,et al.  Cryopreservation of fetal skin is improved by extracellular trehalose. , 2002, Cryobiology.

[19]  S. Williams,et al.  Genotype and the cryopreservation process affect the levels of aneuploidy and chromosome breakage in cultured human fibroblasts. , 1989, Genome.

[20]  Ada T Feldman,et al.  Tissue processing and hematoxylin and eosin staining. , 2014, Methods in molecular biology.

[21]  T. Akkoç,et al.  Tissue cryobanking for conservation programs: effect of tissue type and storage time after death , 2012, Cell and Tissue Banking.

[22]  Ma Cai-hong Immunohistochemical study of desmoglein2 in cryopreserved human skins , 2008 .