New wide-area algorithms for detecting angle instability using synchrophasors

Electric power system is undergoing major technological advances with many new installations of synchrophasors across the North American grid as well in power systems all over the world. Wide-area monitoring system (WAMS) in the Pacific Northwest and the Eastern Interconnection Phasor Project (EIPP) in the eastern grid are examples of such installations. Synchrophasors together with modern communication technology facilitate the monitoring of the current state of the power system including the phase angles of the bus voltages at critical buses in a time-synchronized fashion. Power system operation is constantly facing contingencies such as from line faults and generator outages. For operational reliability, the system must be able to withstand all credible contingencies, either by itself (for N-1 contingency) or with the help of Special Protection Schemes (SPS) or Remedial Action Schemes (RAS) (for N-2 or worse contingencies). However, when the system is operating under unforeseen conditions or under unusually high stress, the system can experience the angle instability. In that case, the system breaks up into many islands, resulting in large loss of loads and generations and a potential blackout scenario. In this paper, new algorithms are proposed for detecting the emergence of angle instability phenomenon while it is still evolving so that suitable countermeasures can be initiated to prevent the islanding. The proposed algorithms and the controller detect the fast separation of phase angles among the critical areas automatically by using the synchrophasors, and proceed to mitigate the instability by suitable switching action. Briefly, the algorithms initiate tripping of critical generators in the accelerating part of the system when necessary, and also initiate load shedding in the decelerating part of the system whenever necessary. The novelty of the algorithms is in the fact that all the decisions are made in real-time purely based on the wide-area synchrophasor measurements without any knowledge of the details of the relay actions that may have resulted in the angle stability phenomenon. The concept of a real-time transient energy function method for the large power system is also explored to solve the problem. The paper will discuss the new algorithms along with illustrative examples on standard IEEE test systems.

[1]  S. E. Stanton,et al.  Application of phasor measurements and partial energy analysis in stabilizing large disturbances , 1995 .

[2]  Charles Concordia,et al.  Power System Stability , 1985, IEEE Power Engineering Review.

[3]  A. Michel,et al.  Power system transient stability using individual machine energy functions , 1983 .

[4]  Kenneth E. Martin,et al.  WACS-Wide-Area Stability and Voltage Control System: R&D and Online Demonstration , 2005, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[5]  R. Podmore,et al.  A Practical Method for the Direct Analysis of Transient Stability , 1979, IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems.

[6]  Dongchen. Hu A wide-area control for mitigating angle instability in electric power systems , 2006 .

[7]  Vijay Vittal,et al.  Power System Transient Stability Analysis Using the Transient Energy Function Method , 1991 .

[8]  G. Moreschini,et al.  Coordination between the reactive power scheduling function and the hierarchical voltage control of the EHV ENEL system , 1995 .

[9]  P. Pruvot,et al.  An improved voltage control on large-scale power system , 1996 .

[10]  S. E. Stanton,et al.  Analysis of a Local Transient Control Action by Partial Energy Functions , 1989, IEEE Power Engineering Review.

[11]  Marija D. Ilic,et al.  On-line voltage regulation: the case of New England , 1999 .

[12]  A. Fouad,et al.  Transient Stability of a Multi-Machine Power System Part I: Investigation of System Trajectories , 1981, IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems.

[13]  Innocent Kamwa,et al.  Wide-area measurement based stabilizing control of large power systems-a decentralized/hierarchical approach , 2001 .

[14]  J. Y. Leost,et al.  Survey of the Secondary Voltage Control in France : Present Realization and Investigations , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[15]  J.H. Chow,et al.  Synchronized Phasor Data Based Energy Function Analysis of Dominant Power Transfer Paths in Large Power Systems , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[16]  P. Aylett The energy-integral criterion of transient stability limits of power systems , 1958 .

[17]  Marija D. Ilic,et al.  A steady state voltage monitoring and control algorithm using localized least square minimization of load voltage deviations , 1996 .

[18]  A. Fouad,et al.  Transient Stability of a Multi-Machine Power System. Part II: Critical Transient Energy , 1981, IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems.

[19]  Christian Rehtanz,et al.  Wide area measurement and protection system for emergency voltage stability control , 2002, 2002 IEEE Power Engineering Society Winter Meeting. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.02CH37309).

[20]  Stewart E. Stanton,et al.  Transient Stability Monitoring for Electric Power Systems Using a Partial Energy Function , 1989, IEEE Power Engineering Review.

[21]  K. Tomsovic,et al.  Adaptive remedial action scheme based on transient energy analysis , 2004, IEEE PES Power Systems Conference and Exposition, 2004..

[22]  Kevin Tomsovic,et al.  Designing the Next Generation of Real-Time Control, Communication, and Computations for Large Power Systems , 2005, Proceedings of the IEEE.