When do Researchers Collaborate? Toward a Model of Collaboration Propensity in Science and Engineering Research

This exploratory study compares two approaches to understanding the “collaboration propensity” of individual researchers. On the one hand, social comparisons of disciplines would suggest that collaboration is a function of orientation toward individual versus collective responsibility for discovery. A contrasting approach would hold that collaboration depends on the work researchers are engaged in—when it is useful to collaborate, they will do so regardless of the social climate. Results presented here suggest that this latter approach is potentially more powerful but that there are complexities in measurement and operationalization that urge a more nuanced treatment of collaboration propensity. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

[1]  S. Traweek,et al.  Beamtimes and Lifetimes: The World of High Energy Physicists , 1988 .

[2]  H. Collins The Meaning of Data: Open and Closed Evidential Cultures in the Search for Gravitational Waves1 , 1998, American Journal of Sociology.

[3]  Kevin Crowston,et al.  The interdisciplinary study of coordination , 1994, CSUR.

[4]  James D. Myers,et al.  Collaboratories: Doing Science on the Internet , 1996, Computer.

[5]  Stephanie D. Teasley,et al.  Collaboratories to support distributed science: the example of international HIV/AIDS research , 2002 .

[6]  Thomas A. Finholt,et al.  Collaboratories as a new form of scientific organization , 2003 .

[7]  W. Hagstrom The scientific community , 1966 .

[8]  Jeremy P. Birnholtz,et al.  Data at work: supporting sharing in science and engineering , 2003, GROUP.

[9]  Joshua S. Gans,et al.  First Author Conditions , 1998 .

[10]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Network Structure, Self-Organization and the Growth of International Collaboration in Science.Research Policy, 34(10), 2005, 1608-1618. , 2005, 0911.4299.

[11]  Debora Shaw,et al.  A cast of thousands: Coauthorship and subauthorship collaboration in the 20th century as manifested in the scholarly journal literature of psychology and philosophy , 2003, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[12]  Diane Vaughan,et al.  The Rôle of the Organization in the Production of Techno-Scientific Knowledge , 1999 .

[13]  Sara Kiesler,et al.  KDI INITIATIVE: MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENTIFIC COLLABORATIONS , 2003 .

[14]  Sara B. Kiesler,et al.  Returns to science: computer networks in oceanography , 1993, CACM.

[15]  Donald de B. Beaver,et al.  Reflections on Scientific Collaboration (and its study): Past, Present, and Future , 2001, Scientometrics.

[16]  James D. Thompson Organizations in Action: Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory , 1967 .

[17]  M E Newman,et al.  Scientific collaboration networks. I. Network construction and fundamental results. , 2001, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[18]  Amalya L. Oliver Biotechnology entrepreneurial scientists and their collaborations , 2004 .

[19]  Joan C. Woodward Industrial Organization: Theory and Practice , 1966 .

[20]  Donald Kennedy,et al.  Multiple Authors, Multiple Problems , 2003, Science.

[21]  Karen Ruhleder,et al.  Steps towards an ecology of infrastructure: complex problems in design and access for large-scale collaborative systems , 1994, CSCW '94.

[22]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Patterns of contact and communication in scientific research collaboration , 1990, CSCW '88.

[23]  Pamela J. Hinds,et al.  Computer Network Use, Collaboration Structures, and Productivity , 2002 .

[24]  W. Hagstrom Competition in Science , 1974 .

[25]  O. Persson,et al.  Understanding Patterns of International Scientific Collaboration , 1992 .

[26]  D. Dillman Mail and telephone surveys : the total design method , 1979 .

[27]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Determinants of Coordination Modes within Organizations , 1976 .

[28]  Harriet Zuckerman,et al.  Scientific Elite: Nobel Laureates in the United States: , 1979 .

[29]  B. Latour,et al.  Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts , 1979 .

[30]  H. Asher Causal modeling , 1976 .

[31]  Benjamin Sims,et al.  Concrete Practices , 1999 .

[32]  Kevin Davies,et al.  Cracking the genome : inside the race to unlock human DNA , 2001 .

[33]  D. Price,et al.  Little Science, Big Science and Beyond , 1986 .

[34]  Wesley Shrum,et al.  Trust, Conflict and Performance in Scientific Collaborations , 2001 .

[35]  A Newell,et al.  Computer Networks: Prospects for Scientists , 1982, Science.

[36]  Catherine Westfall,et al.  Big Science: The Growth of Large-Scale Research ed. by Peter Galison, Bruce Hevly (review) , 1992, Technology and Culture.

[37]  B. Latour Science in Action , 1987 .

[38]  Ann S. Zimmerman,et al.  DATA SHARING AND SECONDARY USE OF SCIENTIFIC DATA: EXPERIENCES OF ECOLOGISTS , 2003 .

[39]  G. Olson,et al.  From Laboratories to Collaboratories: A New Organizational Form for Scientific Collaboration , 1997 .

[40]  Joel Cohen,et al.  Computer mediated communication and publication productivity among faculty , 1996, Internet Res..

[41]  Nora D Volkow,et al.  Neuroscience Networks , 2003, PLoS biology.

[42]  James D. Watson,et al.  The Double Helix: A Personal Account of the Discovery of the Structure of DNA , 1968 .

[43]  Michael H. Kutner Applied Linear Statistical Models , 1974 .

[44]  John P. Walsh,et al.  Connecting minds: computer-mediated communication and scientific work , 2000 .

[45]  C. Perrow Complex Organizations: A Critical Essay , 1975 .

[46]  K. Crowley,et al.  What Makes Collaborations Across a Distance Succeed?: The Case of the Cognitive Science Community. , 2002 .

[47]  Jeffrey Mervis Marburger Asks Social Scientists for a Helping Hand in Interpreting Data , 2005, Science.

[48]  L. Cronbach Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests , 1951 .

[49]  J. Jaccard,et al.  Interaction effects in multiple regression , 1992 .

[50]  G. Melin Pragmatism and self-organization: Research collaboration on the individual level , 2000 .

[51]  P. Galison Refections on Image and Logic: A Material Culture of Microphysics , 1999, Perspectives on Science.

[52]  Edward G. Carmines,et al.  Reliability and Validity Assessment , 1979 .

[53]  K. K. Cetina Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge , 1999 .

[54]  Matthew B. Miles,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook , 1994 .

[55]  R. Whitley The Intellectual and Social Organization of the Sciences (Second Edition: with new introductory chapter entitled 'Science Transformed? The Changing Nature of Knowledge Production at the End of the Twentieth Century') , 1984 .

[56]  Elizabeth A. Corley,et al.  Scientists' collaboration strategies: implications for scientific and technical human capital , 2004 .

[57]  D. Price Little Science, Big Science , 1965 .

[58]  Jeremy Birnholtz What does it mean to be an author? The intersection of credit, contribution, and collaboration in science , 2006 .

[59]  Christine Sutton,et al.  The particle odyssey : a journey to the heart of the matter , 2002 .

[60]  Stephen H. Koslow,et al.  Should the neuroscience community make a paradigm shift to sharing primary data? , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[61]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. , 1964 .

[62]  Blaise Cronin,et al.  Hyperauthorship: A postmodern perversion or evidence of a structural shift in scholarly communication practices? , 2001, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[63]  Nabil Amara,et al.  The impact of transaction costs on the institutional structuration of collaborative academic research , 1998 .

[64]  Robert F. DeVellis,et al.  Scale Development: Theory and Applications. , 1992 .

[65]  Judith S. Olson,et al.  Distance Matters , 2000, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[66]  M. Newman,et al.  Scientific collaboration networks. II. Shortest paths, weighted networks, and centrality. , 2001, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[67]  S. Fuchs,et al.  The Professional Quest for Truth: A Social Theory of Science and Knowledge , 1992 .

[68]  Jonathon N. Cummings,et al.  Collaborative Research Across Disciplinary and Organizational Boundaries , 2005 .

[69]  G. Taubes Nobel Dreams: Power, Deceit, and the Ultimate Experiment , 1987 .

[70]  J. S. Katz,et al.  What is research collaboration , 1997 .

[71]  Noriko Hara,et al.  An emerging view of scientific collaboration: Scientists' perspectives on collaboration and factors that impact collaboration , 2003, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[72]  Melissa S. Anderson,et al.  Withholding research results in academic life science. Evidence from a national survey of faculty. , 1997, JAMA.

[73]  W. Patrick McCray Large Telescopes and the Moral Economy of Recent Astronomy , 2000 .

[74]  M. Nentwich Cyberscience: Research in the Age of the Internet , 2003 .

[75]  Daniel Atkins,et al.  Revolutionizing Science and Engineering Through Cyberinfrastructure: Report of the National Science Foundation Blue-Ribbon Advisory Panel on Cyberinfrastructure , 2003 .

[76]  John P. Walsh,et al.  Computer Networks and Scientific Work , 1996 .

[77]  T. Allen Managing the flow of technology , 1977 .

[78]  S. Barley Technicians in the Workplace: Ethnographic Evidence for Bringing Work into Organizational Studies , 1996 .