A Review on Dependence Measures in Exploring Brain Networks from fMRI Data

Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) technique allows us to capture activities occurring in a human brain via signals from blood flow, known as BOLD (blood oxygen level-dependent) signals. Exploring a relationship among brain regions inside human brains from fMRI data is an active and challenging research topic. Relationships or associations between brain regions are commonly referred to as brain connectivity or brain network. This connectivity can be divided into two groups, the functional connectivity which describes the statistical information among brain regions and the effective connectivity which specifies how one region interacts with others by a causal model. This survey paper provides a review on learning brain connectivities via fMRI data, mathematical definitions or dependence measures of such connectivities. These well-known measures include correlation, partial correlation, conditional independence, dynamical causal modeling, Granger causality, and structural equation modeling, which all can be translated in terms of mathematical conditions of model parameters. We also discusses about relevant estimation techniques that have been widely used in the problems of fMRI modeling. Understanding a rigorous definition on relationships in human brain allows us to interpret or compare the results in the context of learning brain network more clearly.

[1]  Habib Benali,et al.  Partial correlation for functional brain interactivity investigation in functional MRI , 2006, NeuroImage.

[2]  D Lehmann,et al.  Isolated effective coherence (iCoh): causal information flow excluding indirect paths , 2014 .

[3]  Mingzhou Ding,et al.  Detecting directional influence in fMRI connectivity analysis using PCA based Granger causality , 2009, Brain Research.

[4]  Karl J. Friston Functional and Effective Connectivity: A Review , 2011, Brain Connect..

[5]  Weidong Liu,et al.  High-dimensional Sparse Precision Matrix Estimation via Sparse Column Inverse Operator ∗ , 2012 .

[6]  G. Rangarajan,et al.  Multivariate Granger causality: an estimation framework based on factorization of the spectral density matrix , 2013, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[7]  Motoaki Kawanabe,et al.  Modeling Sparse Connectivity Between Underlying Brain Sources for EEG/MEG , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[8]  M. Lindquist The Statistical Analysis of fMRI Data. , 2008, 0906.3662.

[9]  Wei Zhu,et al.  Unified structural equation modeling approach for the analysis of multisubject, multivariate functional MRI data , 2007, Human brain mapping.

[10]  Aapo Hyvärinen,et al.  Group-PCA for very large fMRI datasets , 2014, NeuroImage.

[11]  E. Bullmore,et al.  Undirected graphs of frequency-dependent functional connectivity in whole brain networks , 2005, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[12]  Bin Hu,et al.  Resting-State Whole-Brain Functional Connectivity Networks for MCI Classification Using L2-Regularized Logistic Regression , 2015, IEEE Transactions on NanoBioscience.

[13]  Puttichai Lertkultanon,et al.  Sparse system identification for discovering brain connectivity from fMRI time series , 2013, The SICE Annual Conference 2013.

[14]  Bo Wahlberg,et al.  ARMA Identification of Graphical Models , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[15]  Kathleen M. Gates,et al.  State space modeling of time-varying contemporaneous and lagged relations in connectivity maps , 2016, NeuroImage.

[16]  G. Varoquaux,et al.  Markov models for fMRI correlation structure: Is brain functional connectivity small world, or decomposable into networks? , 2012, Journal of Physiology-Paris.

[17]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Effective connectivity: Influence, causality and biophysical modeling , 2011, NeuroImage.

[18]  Yang Wang,et al.  Probabilistic Framework for Brain Connectivity From Functional MR Images , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[19]  Anil K. Seth,et al.  A MATLAB toolbox for Granger causal connectivity analysis , 2010, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[20]  Michael Eichler,et al.  On the Evaluation of Information Flow in Multivariate Systems by the Directed Transfer Function , 2006, Biological Cybernetics.

[21]  S. Bressler,et al.  Granger Causality: Basic Theory and Application to Neuroscience , 2006, q-bio/0608035.

[22]  Rainer Dahlhaus,et al.  Partial correlation analysis for the identification of synaptic connections , 2003, Biological Cybernetics.

[23]  Erick Jorge Canales-Rodríguez,et al.  Granger Causality on Spatial Manifolds: Applications to Neuroimaging , 2006 .

[24]  Lieven Vandenberghe,et al.  1 Graphical models of autoregressive processes , 2009 .

[25]  Moriah E. Thomason,et al.  Vector autoregression, structural equation modeling, and their synthesis in neuroimaging data analysis , 2011, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[26]  John Shawe-Taylor,et al.  Sparse Network-Based Models for Patient Classification Using fMRI , 2013, PRNI.

[27]  Adeel Razi,et al.  The Connected Brain: Causality, models, and intrinsic dynamics , 2016, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[28]  A. Ravishankar Rao,et al.  Full-brain auto-regressive modeling (FARM) using fMRI , 2011, NeuroImage.

[29]  Katya Scheinberg,et al.  Learning Sparse Gaussian Markov Networks Using a Greedy Coordinate Ascent Approach , 2010, ECML/PKDD.

[30]  Kaiming Li,et al.  Review of methods for functional brain connectivity detection using fMRI , 2009, Comput. Medical Imaging Graph..

[31]  O. Sporns,et al.  Complex brain networks: graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems , 2009, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[32]  Gustavo Deco,et al.  Functional connectivity dynamics: Modeling the switching behavior of the resting state , 2015, NeuroImage.

[33]  Jagath C. Rajapakse,et al.  Stability of building gene regulatory networks with sparse autoregressive models , 2011, BMC Bioinformatics.

[34]  M. Greicius,et al.  Resting-state functional connectivity reflects structural connectivity in the default mode network. , 2009, Cerebral cortex.

[35]  Pedro A. Valdes-Sosa,et al.  Tensor Analysis and Fusion of Multimodal Brain Images , 2015, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[36]  Aiping Liu,et al.  A Sticky Weighted Regression Model for Time-Varying Resting-State Brain Connectivity Estimation , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[37]  Adeel Razi,et al.  A DCM for resting state fMRI , 2014, NeuroImage.

[38]  Simon Schwab,et al.  Functional connectivity in BOLD and CBF data: Similarity and reliability of resting brain networks , 2015, NeuroImage.

[39]  Wesley K. Thompson,et al.  MATLAB toolbox for functional connectivity , 2009, NeuroImage.

[40]  Luca Faes,et al.  Measuring Connectivity in Linear Multivariate Processes: Definitions, Interpretation, and Practical Analysis , 2012, Comput. Math. Methods Medicine.

[41]  Martin J. McKeown,et al.  Probabilistic Boolean Network Analysis of Brain Connectivity in Parkinson's Disease , 2008, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing.

[42]  Vince D. Calhoun,et al.  Automatic Identification of Functional Clusters in fMRI Data Using Spatial Dependence , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[43]  Rainer Goebel,et al.  Independent component model of the default-mode brain function: combining individual-level and population-level analyses in resting-state fMRI. , 2008, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[44]  Vince D. Calhoun,et al.  Dynamic Granger causality based on Kalman filter for evaluation of functional network connectivity in fMRI data , 2010, NeuroImage.

[45]  M. Eichler,et al.  Assessing the strength of directed influences among neural signals using renormalized partial directed coherence , 2009, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[46]  A. Seth,et al.  Multivariate Granger causality and generalized variance. , 2010, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[47]  Jitkomut Songsiri,et al.  Learning multiple granger graphical models via group fused lasso , 2015, 2015 10th Asian Control Conference (ASCC).

[48]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  Complex network measures of brain connectivity: Uses and interpretations , 2010, NeuroImage.

[49]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Analysing connectivity with Granger causality and dynamic causal modelling , 2013, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[50]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  The future of FMRI connectivity , 2012, NeuroImage.

[51]  Christian Windischberger,et al.  Toward discovery science of human brain function , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[52]  Rainer Goebel,et al.  The identification of interacting networks in the brain using fMRI: Model selection, causality and deconvolution , 2011, NeuroImage.

[53]  Russell A. Poldrack,et al.  The future of fMRI in cognitive neuroscience , 2012, NeuroImage.

[54]  Lester Melie-García,et al.  Estimating brain functional connectivity with sparse multivariate autoregression , 2005, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[55]  M. V. D. Heuvel,et al.  Exploring the brain network: A review on resting-state fMRI functional connectivity , 2010, European Neuropsychopharmacology.

[56]  Luca Faes,et al.  Testing Frequency-Domain Causality in Multivariate Time Series , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[57]  J. R. Rosenberg,et al.  Identification of patterns of neuronal connectivity—partial spectra, partial coherence, and neuronal interactions , 1998, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[58]  Kathleen M. Gates,et al.  Automatic search for fMRI connectivity mapping: An alternative to Granger causality testing using formal equivalences among SEM path modeling, VAR, and unified SEM , 2010, NeuroImage.

[59]  Mingzhou Ding,et al.  Evaluating causal relations in neural systems: Granger causality, directed transfer function and statistical assessment of significance , 2001, Biological Cybernetics.

[60]  Hongtu Zhu,et al.  Structural equation modeling and principal component analysis of gray matter volumes in major depressive and bipolar disorders: Differences in latent volumetric structure , 2010, Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging.

[61]  Chee-Ming Ting,et al.  Estimating Effective Connectivity from fMRI Data Using Factor-based Subspace Autoregressive Models , 2015, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[62]  Stefan Haufe,et al.  Sparse Causal Discovery in Multivariate Time Series , 2010, NIPS Causality: Objectives and Assessment.

[63]  R. Cameron Craddock,et al.  Exploratory structural equation modeling of resting-state fMRI: Applicability of group models to individual subjects , 2009, NeuroImage.

[64]  Li Yao,et al.  Applications of Granger Causality Model to Connectivity Network Based on fMRI Time Series , 2006, ICNC.

[65]  Ali Shojaie,et al.  Discovering graphical Granger causality using the truncating lasso penalty , 2010, Bioinform..

[66]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Granger causality revisited , 2014, NeuroImage.

[67]  Wei Liao,et al.  Kernel Granger Causality Mapping Effective Connectivity on fMRI Data , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[68]  Kathleen M. Gates,et al.  Group search algorithm recovers effective connectivity maps for individuals in homogeneous and heterogeneous samples , 2012, NeuroImage.

[69]  Jitkomut Songsiri Sparse autoregressive model estimation for learning granger causality in time series , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing.

[70]  Juan Manuel Górriz,et al.  Brain Connectivity Analysis: A Short Survey , 2012, Comput. Intell. Neurosci..

[71]  Robert Tibshirani,et al.  The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction, 2nd Edition , 2001, Springer Series in Statistics.

[72]  Aiping Liu,et al.  A Genetically Informed, Group fMRI Connectivity Modeling Approach: Application to Schizophrenia , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[73]  Richard G. Lomax,et al.  A Beginner's Guide to Structural Equation Modeling , 2022 .

[74]  Dimitri Van De Ville,et al.  Principal components of functional connectivity: A new approach to study dynamic brain connectivity during rest , 2013, NeuroImage.

[75]  João Ricardo Sato,et al.  Granger Causality in Systems Biology: Modeling Gene Networks in Time Series Microarray Data Using Vector Autoregressive Models , 2010, BSB.

[76]  Jieun Kim,et al.  How well does structural equation modeling reveal abnormal brain anatomical connections? An fMRI simulation study , 2009, NeuroImage.

[77]  Hossein Shahamat,et al.  A texture-based method for classification of schizophrenia using fMRI data , 2015 .

[78]  Bernard Devauchelle,et al.  Principle of structural equation modeling for exploring functional interactivity within a putative network of interconnected brain areas. , 2009, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[79]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Dynamic causal modeling , 2010, Scholarpedia.

[80]  Suyash P. Awate,et al.  A functional network estimation method of resting-state fMRI using a hierarchical Markov random field , 2014, NeuroImage.

[81]  Lee M. Miller,et al.  Measuring interregional functional connectivity using coherence and partial coherence analyses of fMRI data , 2004, NeuroImage.

[82]  Michael Breakspear,et al.  Graph analysis of the human connectome: Promise, progress, and pitfalls , 2013, NeuroImage.

[83]  Rainer Goebel,et al.  Real-time independent component analysis of fMRI time-series , 2003, NeuroImage.

[84]  Kathleen M. Gates,et al.  Extended unified SEM approach for modeling event-related fMRI data , 2011, NeuroImage.

[85]  Anil K. Seth,et al.  The MVGC multivariate Granger causality toolbox: A new approach to Granger-causal inference , 2014, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[86]  K. Kendrick,et al.  Partial Granger causality—Eliminating exogenous inputs and latent variables , 2008, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[87]  A. Seth,et al.  Granger Causality Analysis in Neuroscience and Neuroimaging , 2015, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[88]  Paul J. Laurienti,et al.  A two-part mixed-effects modeling framework for analyzing whole-brain network data , 2014, NeuroImage.

[89]  Lieven Vandenberghe,et al.  Topology Selection in Graphical Models of Autoregressive Processes , 2010, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[90]  Daoqiang Zhang,et al.  Group-constrained sparse fMRI connectivity modeling for mild cognitive impairment identification , 2013, Brain Structure and Function.

[91]  Convex Optimization in Signal Processing and Communications , 2010 .

[92]  Luiz A. Baccalá,et al.  Partial directed coherence: a new concept in neural structure determination , 2001, Biological Cybernetics.

[93]  Martin A. Lindquist,et al.  Dynamic connectivity regression: Determining state-related changes in brain connectivity , 2012, NeuroImage.

[94]  Roman Filipovych,et al.  Identifying Sparse Connectivity Patterns in the brain using resting-state fMRI , 2015, NeuroImage.

[95]  Mark W. Woolrich,et al.  Network modelling methods for FMRI , 2011, NeuroImage.

[96]  Heng Huang,et al.  Sparse representation of whole-brain fMRI signals for identification of functional networks , 2015, Medical Image Anal..

[97]  Russell A. Poldrack,et al.  Six problems for causal inference from fMRI , 2010, NeuroImage.

[98]  Hao He,et al.  Assessing dynamic brain graphs of time-varying connectivity in fMRI data: Application to healthy controls and patients with schizophrenia , 2015, NeuroImage.

[99]  L.A. Baccald,et al.  Generalized Partial Directed Coherence , 2007, 2007 15th International Conference on Digital Signal Processing.

[100]  M. D’Esposito,et al.  A comparison of Granger causality and coherency in fMRI‐based analysis of the motor system , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[101]  Scott Peltier,et al.  Connectivity exploration with structural equation modeling: an fMRI study of bimanual motor coordination , 2005, NeuroImage.

[102]  Klaas E. Stephan,et al.  A short history of causal modeling of fMRI data , 2012, NeuroImage.