Optimization and evaluation of surface-enhanced laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (SELDI-TOF MS) with reversed-phase protein arrays for protein profiling

Abstract Surface-enhanced laser desorption/ionization (SELDI) time-of-flight mass spectrometry with protein arrays has facilitated the discovery of disease-specific protein profiles in serum. Such results raise hopes that protein profiles may become a powerful diagnostic tool. To this end, reliable and reproducible protein profiles need to be generated from many samples, accurate mass peak heights are necessary, and the experimental variation of the profiles must be known. We adapted the entire processing of protein arrays to a robotics system, thus improving the intra-assay coefficients of variation (CVs) from 45.1% to 27.8% (p<0.001). In addition, we assessed up to 16 technical replicates, and demonstrated that analysis of 2–4 replicates significantly increases the reliability of the protein profiles. A recent report on limited long-term reproducibility seemed to concord with our initial inter-assay CVs, which varied widely and reached up to 56.7%. However, we discovered that the inter-assay CV is strongly dependent on the drying time before application of the matrix molecule. Therefore, we devised a standardized drying process and demonstrated that our optimized SELDI procedure generates reliable and long-term reproducible protein profiles with CVs ranging from 25.7% to 32.6%, depending on the signal-to-noise ratio threshold used.

[1]  P. Selby,et al.  Proteomic profiling of urinary proteins in renal cancer by surface enhanced laser desorption ionization and neural-network analysis: identification of key issues affecting potential clinical utility. , 2003, Cancer research.

[2]  K. Kozak,et al.  Identification of biomarkers for ovarian cancer using strong anion-exchange ProteinChips: Potential use in diagnosis and prognosis , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  Bao-Ling Adam,et al.  Diagnostic potential of serum proteomic patterns in prostate cancer. , 2003, The Journal of urology.

[4]  Min Zhan,et al.  A data review and re-assessment of ovarian cancer serum proteomic profiling , 2003, BMC Bioinformatics.

[5]  T. Yip,et al.  Comprehensive proteomic profiling identifies serum proteomic signatures for detection of hepatocellular carcinoma and its subtypes. , 2003, Clinical chemistry.

[6]  Mark S. Boguski,et al.  Biomedical informatics for proteomics , 2003, Nature.

[7]  H C Cordingley,et al.  Multifactorial screening design and analysis of SELDI-TOF ProteinChip array optimization experiments. , 2003, BioTechniques.

[8]  S. Hanash Disease proteomics : Proteomics , 2003 .

[9]  S. Hanash,et al.  Disease proteomics , 2003, Nature.

[10]  R. W. Doerge,et al.  Calculation of the minimum number of replicate spots required for detection of significant gene expression fold change in microarray experiments , 2002, Bioinform..

[11]  S. Hankinson,et al.  Lifestyle correlates of plasma insulin-like growth factor I and insulin-like growth factor binding protein 3 concentrations. , 2002, Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology.

[12]  D. Chan,et al.  Proteomics and bioinformatics approaches for identification of serum biomarkers to detect breast cancer. , 2002, Clinical chemistry.

[13]  P. Schellhammer,et al.  Serum protein fingerprinting coupled with a pattern-matching algorithm distinguishes prostate cancer from benign prostate hyperplasia and healthy men. , 2002, Cancer research.

[14]  E. Fung,et al.  ProteinChip clinical proteomics: computational challenges and solutions. , 2002, BioTechniques.

[15]  E. Petricoin,et al.  Use of proteomic patterns in serum to identify ovarian cancer , 2002, The Lancet.

[16]  A. Hildesheim,et al.  Detection and quantitation of human papillomavirus DNA in the plasma of patients with cervical carcinoma. , 2002, Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology.

[17]  G. A. Whitmore,et al.  Importance of replication in microarray gene expression studies: statistical methods and evidence from repetitive cDNA hybridizations. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  T. Yip,et al.  New desorption strategies for the mass spectrometric analysis of macromolecules , 1993 .

[19]  R. Sokal,et al.  Numerical Taxonomy: The Principles and Practice of Numerical Classification. , 1975 .