A hybrid photogrammetry approach for archaeological sites: Block alignment issues in a case study (the Roman camp of A Cidadela)

Abstract Photogrammetry is a cost-effective and versatile technique used for the three-dimensional (3D) registration of archaeological heritage sites. Managing datasets of heterogeneous images in terms of camera type, elevation platform, position or acquisition time can now be addressed by structure from motion (SfM) software via bundle adjustment in a single block based on collinearity principles. This development enables new possibilities with regard to data completeness assurance for 3D documentation, even for complex sites with occlusive elements and hidden areas. However, hybrid photogrammetry in large datasets often requires multiple photogrammetric blocks that must be processed individually and subsequently aligned to obtain a unified point cloud. In this paper, we discuss the steps required to homogenize the information and the methods used to perform block alignment in these cases. A case study of low-altitude aerial photogrammetry with several cameras and platforms is presented for the Roman camp of A Cidadela in NW Spain as a representative example of an archaeological site that is difficult to survey using a single photogrammetric platform. The relatively large expanse of the area and the fact that it is partially covered by a protective structure constitute an ideal framework for the fusion of multiplatform imagery. The most accurate digital surface model (DSM) was obtained via point-based method fusion, during which subsets are aligned based on automatically extracted tie points (TPs) between the dense point clouds; however, point-based method fusion is very time consuming. When hardware capabilities allow, conducting the process in a single block is preferable, which is a noticeably more accurate procedure than independent block fusion.

[1]  Fernando Carvajal-Ramírez,et al.  Assessment of UAV-photogrammetric mapping accuracy based on variation of ground control points , 2018, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[2]  K. Essa,et al.  EVOLVING TECHNIQUES OF DOCUMENTATION OF A WORLD HERITAGE SITE IN LAHORE , 2017 .

[3]  F. Chiabrando,et al.  SfM FOR ORTHOPHOTO GENERATION: A WINNING APPROACH FOR CULTURAL HERITAGE KNOWLEDGE , 2015 .

[4]  Fabio Menna,et al.  A CRITICAL REVIEW OF AUTOMATED PHOTOGRAMMETRICPROCESSING OF LARGE DATASETS , 2017 .

[5]  Jose Alberto Torres-Martínez,et al.  a Multi-Data Source and Multi-Sensor Approach for the 3d Reconstruction and Visualization of a Complex Archaelogical Site: the Case Study of Tolmo de Minateda , 2015 .

[6]  D. T. Lee,et al.  Two algorithms for constructing a Delaunay triangulation , 1980, International Journal of Computer & Information Sciences.

[7]  M. Westoby,et al.  ‘Structure-from-Motion’ photogrammetry: A low-cost, effective tool for geoscience applications , 2012 .

[8]  Anna Maria Manferdini,et al.  ASSESSMENTS FOR 3D RECONSTRUCTIONS OF CULTURAL HERITAGE USING DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES , 2013 .

[9]  L. Moore,et al.  Ground control point requirements for structure-from-motion derived topography in low-slope coastal environments , 2015 .

[10]  Menna,et al.  ACCURACY AND BLOCK DEFORMATION ANALYSIS IN AUTOMATIC UAV AND TERRESTRIAL PHOTOGRAMMETRY – LESSON LEARNT – , 2013 .

[11]  Samuel T. Thiele,et al.  Ground-based and UAV-Based photogrammetry: A multi-scale, high-resolution mapping tool for structural geology and paleoseismology , 2014 .

[12]  S. Field,et al.  The utility of UAVs for archaeological surface survey: A comparative study , 2017 .

[13]  Andrew Bevan,et al.  A comparative assessment of structure from motion methods for archaeological research , 2014 .

[14]  P. Sapirstein,et al.  Accurate measurement with photogrammetry at large sites , 2016 .

[15]  Marco Scaioni,et al.  Combination of UAV and terrestrial photogrammetry to assess rapid glacier evolution and map glacier hazards , 2018 .

[16]  S. Campana Drones in Archaeology. State‐of‐the‐art and Future Perspectives , 2017 .

[17]  Paolo Russo,et al.  Accuracy of cultural heritage 3D models by RPAS and terrestrial photogrammetry , 2014 .

[18]  Friedrich Fraundorfer,et al.  On the Use of Uavs in Mining and Archaeology - Geo-Accurate 3d Reconstructions Using Various Platforms and Terrestrial Views , 2015 .

[19]  Toby N. Tonkin,et al.  Ground-Control Networks for Image Based Surface Reconstruction: An Investigation of Optimum Survey Designs Using UAV Derived Imagery and Structure-from-Motion Photogrammetry , 2016, Remote. Sens..